SPECIAL COVERAGE
CHANDIGARH

LUDHIANA

DELHI
O P I N I O N S

Perspective | Oped | Reflections

Perspective

The business of expelling Excellencies
Don’t shoot the messenger
by T.P. Sreenivasan

W
e are not unfamiliar with stories of punishment being meted out to the messenger for the message that he has brought. Duryodhana ordered imprisonment of Krishna for the message that the Kauravas would be destroyed in the Kurukshetra war if they did not do justice to the Pandavas.

On Record
Reservations for minorities will not help:
Tarlochan Singh
by TR Ramachandran

M
r
Tarlochan Singh bowed out as the Chairman of the National Commission of Minorities (NCM) last Wednesday, after a three year term. He has served as its Vice-Chairman as well, and was the first Sikh and non-Muslim to have headed the NCM.






EARLIER STORIES

Forward with
nuclear deal

February 11, 2006
Shut and open cases
February 10, 2006
Raj Babbar’s outbursts
February 9, 2006
After 10K
February 8, 2006
Left alone
February 7, 2006
Iran in the dock
February 6, 2006
Regulatory body needed
February 5, 2006
Guaranteed jobs
February 4, 2006
Pay panel pill
February 3, 2006
Scope for diplomacy
February2, 2006
THE TRIBUNE SPECIALS
50 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE

TERCENTENARY CELEBRATIONS

Scrap MPLADS and strengthen decentralisation
by Mahi Pal
T
he MPs’ Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) needs to be examined from the perspective of decentralisation efforts in the country. CAG reports (1993-97, 1997-2000) and the Standing Committee on Finance (1998-99) have pointed to operational lapses and the failure of the government to effectively administer and monitor the scheme and have suggested a thorough review.

Editorial cartoon by Rajinder Puri


OPED

Reflections
Youngsters need to introspect
How do you wish to be remembered?
by Kiran Bedi
I
was invited to speak at a prestigious Business School on Mahatma Gandhi”s Martyrdom Day. On arrival, over a cup of coffee, the director expressed his deep anxiety over the lack of interest of students in education and inculcation of sound values and wondered whether I could focus my talk around this issue.

Profile
All doors open to Murli Deora
by Harihar Swarup
M
urli Deora or Murli Bhai, as he is known to his countless friends and admirers, has been a “friend of friends.” His friendship cuts across the political spectrum; he has no visible enemy though he has certainly had critics in his long and variegated political career.

Diversities — Delhi Letter
Fire in the sky
by Humra Quraishi
P
aradoxes, if I may say so. Just about yesterday evening, getting back home after hearing a detailed lecture at the IIC by Professor Nadia Al Baghdadi of the Central European University at Budapest, on the havoc that has been happening in today’s Iraq, it was as though one was halted midway.

  • Some focus on Kasturba

  • Power of nationalism

 REFLECTIONS

Top










 
Perspective

The business of expelling Excellencies
Don’t shoot the messenger
by T.P. Sreenivasan

We are not unfamiliar with stories of punishment being meted out to the messenger for the message that he has brought. Duryodhana ordered imprisonment of Krishna for the message that the Kauravas would be destroyed in the Kurukshetra war if they did not do justice to the Pandavas. Ravana ordered ignition of Hanuman’s tail for bringing the message that Lanka would be burnt down if Sita was not returned with honour. If they did not have supernatural powers, both these Envoys Extraordinary would have perished for no other crime than performing their duties. The messages would have, however, outlived the messengers.

The tradition of diplomats not engaging in public debate about sensitive subjects has been built over the years for the protection of the diplomats themselves as they have nothing but the goodwill of the hosts to remain operational. But occasionally, they may need to express their governments’ views in public in order to influence local public opinion. As long as we know that those views are not different from the views of their governments, chastising them on grounds of diplomatic impropriety is not a sign of maturity or strength. Action becomes legitimate only if such statements either distort the policy of their governments or incite apathy or violence in the host country.

The pattern of expulsion of diplomats around the globe reveals that it is often the weaker partner in a bilateral relationship that resorts to expulsion of diplomats to make a point. Expulsions on evidence of spying are another matter and cannot be challenged. When a country feels powerless to change the opinion of a foreign country, it feels tempted to use its prerogative to expel diplomats. Such actions can only make matters worse in the bilateral relationship. Eventually the bilateral relationship gets repaired, but the diplomats concerned and their families get affected by the sudden dislocation and the adverse publicity. One consequence of such expulsions is that those declared persona non grata, even for technical reasons, are unable to get back to those countries. In the case of specialists, the expertise lost is regrettable to both the countries concerned.

In the case of the US Ambassador, David Mulford, there is a virtual consensus that he should have shown greater sensitivity to public opinion in India. Clearly, he said things that Indians did not want to hear even if he was speaking of the realities of the Washington power game. Unlike in India, actions of the Government do not always receive the support even of the ruling party in the US Congress. The Congress not only approves policy, but also shapes it in significant ways.

The initial PTI report appeared to suggest that Mulford was dictating Indian policy, but the text released by the US Embassy had none of the sting that was attributed to the scholarly ambassador. He clearly said that the September vote on Iran was not cast by India to please the United States. “It was a vote that was based on India’s judgment of its own national interest”, he said. He even quoted Indian interlocutors as telling him that India did not need another neighbour with nuclear weapons. As for the vote in February, India’s decision, he said, “can be left firmly in the hands of the Indian Government to determine.”

Mulford spoke the truth, which was demonstrated earlier, that India’s vote on Iran would have a bearing on the consideration of the civil nuclear agreement in the Congress. The unfortunate connotation of the word “die” in the Congress must have been unintended as this is a phrase commonly used on the Hill, when no action is taken on a particular legislation. What he said about the impact of the vote on the Nuclear Suppliers Group was also nothing but the truth.

That such truths need not have been uttered by the ambassador at a time the public opinion in India was agitated over alleged aberrations in Indian foreign policy is preliminary. He also did not give any new information to the public as these were being written about widely in the Indian press. He simply provided fresh ammunition to the critics of the Government, who directed some of the fire at the ambassador himself. Such indiscretions lead to a quiet and smooth transfer after the passions die down rather than in expulsions and withdrawals. Since he reflected Washington policy, no harm will come to him even if he does not remain in Delhi.

In our own diplomatic service, we have had several instances of quiet transfers and even expulsions in similar circumstances. Since these are not always publicized, statistics are not available in one place. There have been the highly publicized reciprocal expulsions by India and Pakistan at lower levels. Reciprocal expulsions with friendly countries are done most discreetly and sometimes diplomats under orders of transfer are technically expelled to complete the quota. The expulsion of two of our diplomats from China during the Cultural Revolution was deliberately publicized by the Chinese. One of them left the Foreign Service as a result of the trauma, while the other rose to the highest level in the Service, though his expertise on China could not be fully utilized. Quiet advice by host Governments and financial irregularities have brought back diplomats with little or no publicity. They will figure in the whispers in the South Block corridors for a time and then die out.

My own expulsion from Fiji in 1989 was a demonstration of Fiji’s sense of insecurity vis-à-vis India.

Since we packed a suitcase every time a statement was made in our Parliament or at the United Nations, it was not difficult for us to leave when the orders came that I had only 72 hours more to stay in Fiji. But the reason given for my expulsion did not convince anyone because the speech I made on the occasion of the destruction of a gurdwara was designed not to incite communal passions. I said that it was the result of racial disharmony rather than religious antipathy. By expelling me and by closing down the whole Indian mission later, Fiji lost considerable sympathy abroad. It was after repeated pleas that India agreed to reopen the mission after democracy was restored. I still have 24 hours to spend in Fiji as I left the country within 48 hours after the message was delivered to me!

The writer is a former Ambassador of India.
Top

 

On Record
Reservations for minorities will not help:
Tarlochan Singh
by TR Ramachandran

Tarlochan SinghMr Tarlochan Singh bowed out as the Chairman of the National Commission of Minorities (NCM) last Wednesday, after a three year term. He has served as its Vice-Chairman as well, and was the first Sikh and non-Muslim to have headed the NCM. A multi-faceted personality with a wide range of interests including tourism and sports, he is currently an independent member of the Rajya Sabha from Haryana. He has been a member of the National Human Rights Commission. As an MP he is a member of the Parliamentary advisory committee of the ministry of Civil Aviation and the Privileges Committee of Parliament. He is Chairman of the Publicity Committee of the 2010 Commonwealth Games to be held in this country and Patron of the World Punjabi Organisation.

His main regret is that the NCM failed to play its real role, as the union government never consulted it on the issue of minorities. "I feel the government is not serious about the NCM," he observed in an interview on his last day as NCM Chairman.

Excerpts:

Q: Overall, how do you see the role of the NCM? Has it been able to uphold the peoples’ right to freely profess, practice, propagate and adopt religions?

A: The NCM could not play its real role. The union government never consulted the NCM on any issue concerning the minorities. The present UPA government did not call even one meeting. If the NCM is effective, people will look up to it. However, even though there are organisations trying to drive a wedge between Muslims and Hindus, the NCM has been able to restore confidence among the minorities.

Q: There is a bill pending in Parliament to amend the Act regarding the NCM.

A: The proposed amending legislation will not be effective if the government does not pay attention to the recommendations of the NCM. The issue of minorities has been politicised. Minorities have become a vote bank and political parties want to keep it that way.

Q: How do you view the communal legacy?

A: Nowhere is any injustice sought to be heaped on the minorities. There is no organised effort to put down minorities though some groups raise slogans. By and large people want peace and communal harmony. Political parties must have a code of conduct when it comes to dealing with minorities. Empowerment of minorities is an imperative though I am totally against any kind of reservation. Political parties must give due weightage to the representation of minorities in state assemblies and Parliament.

Q: Talk of minorities presupposes a reference to the Muslim community.

A: We have changed this concept. We have succeeded in having State Minority Commissions in 14 states where all minorities are accommodated. One of the major achievements is having a Minority Commission in Jammu and Kashmir, the only state where the Hindus are going to be the minority. Minority Commissions in the states have Sikhs, Muslims and Christians as their Chairpersons and all minorities are treated on an equal footing.

Q: What is the attitudinal change that you have seen?

A: There is acceptance across the board that improved welfare and economic uplift of the minorities is good for the majority community and the country.

Q: What is your view on Madarsas?

A: Muslims prefer to go to Madarsas which provide religious education. We have underlined the need for modernising the Madarsas so that additional subjects can be taught with available grants. It is for the Muslims to decide that Madarsas can also become normal centres of education.

Q: What is the major weak link in the Muslim community?

A: Child labour. The dropout rate in schools is very high. Regrettably, the Muslim leadership dwells in slogan mongering. They do not recognise their own responsibility in guiding the community and sending the children to school.

Q: Has the NCM’s major initiatives of inviting leaders of all communities for dialogue in maintaining communal harmony helped?

A: For the first time we opened the doors for the majority community leaders for a direct interface with the minorities. It included Hindu leaders from the RSS, Bajrang Dal, the VHP and other institutions. It facilitated in bridging the grouse against the minorities and led to ending the distribution of Trishuls. In the aftermath of the Godhra carnage and riots in Gujarat, the NCM held a sustained dialogue between Muslims and Hindus. There were also several meetings between the Hindus and Christians on the controversial issue of conversions.

Q: The NCM also conducted critical studies about all the minority communities.

A: The dwindling sex ratio among the Sikh community was the subject matter of the study. The study also separately probed the allegation of a population spiral among the Christians in the Northeast. And among the Muslims there was nothing to suggest an abnormal increase in their population. The studies also brought to the fore that 40 per cent of Muslim women were adopting family planning.
Top

 

Scrap MPLADS and strengthen decentralisation
by Mahi Pal

The MPs’ Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) needs to be examined from the perspective of decentralisation efforts in the country.

CAG reports (1993-97, 1997-2000) and the Standing Committee on Finance (1998-99) have pointed to operational lapses and the failure of the government to effectively administer and monitor the scheme and have suggested a thorough review. In November 2001, the Planning Commission evaluated the Scheme and concluded that: “Allocation of funds to most of the works in the selected districts was found to be meagre despite the fact that there is a large unspent balance (46%) of the MPLADS amount… Monitoring and supervision is the weakest part of the scheme, which is largely due to inadequate infrastructure available to the collector vested with the responsibility. The maintenance of the assets created is another area of weakness.”

The most dangerous implication of MPLADS is that it offends the letter and spirit of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments which sought to create a third stratum of local government in the country. A new Ministry of Panchayati Raj was created to strengthen these institutions. State legislatures are now required to endow panchayats and municipalities ‘‘with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government”

The 11th Schedule (Article 243G) and 12th Schedule (Article 243W) contain the list of 47 subjects that should devolve to these institutions. Interestingly, all the 23 items of work meant to be implemented with the guidance of MPs under MPLADS are from the 29 subjects of the 11th Schedule.

As per the constitutional amendment acts in the intermediate and district level tiers, MPs are the members with voting rights. Hence, if any of them wants to promote a local scheme, he can do so through his participation at the local level decision making process. Charity does not begin at home for the MPs. Regional level planning and prioritisation cannot be overlooked. Article 243 ZD of the 74th Constitutional amendment provides for constituting the District Planning Committee. But how can this Committee think of planning when the MPs have their own priorities at a decentralised level. Whose priorities should the administration take note of and act upon?

The adverse cascading effect of MPLADS is that there are more than 30 lakh elected representatives in more than 2.5 lakh Panchayats identifying devolution of powers from Centre and States in the form and on the style of MPLADS. They have frequently been found arguing at various forums that they too were elected representatives and have their constituencies to nurse. They demanded that they also need schemes on the pattern of the MPLADS. Hence, the scheme, if continued has the potential to degenerate the process of decentralisation which was started in the early nineties, and may prove more injurious to the health of the Indian democracy.

The writer is Associate Professor, Haryana Institute of Rural Development, Nilokheri

Top

 
OPED

Reflections
Youngsters need to introspect
How do you wish to be remembered?
by Kiran Bedi

I was invited to speak at a prestigious Business School on Mahatma Gandhi”s Martyrdom Day. On arrival, over a cup of coffee, the director expressed his deep anxiety over the lack of interest of students in education and inculcation of sound values and wondered whether I could focus my talk around this issue.

He triggered my thinking and out of curiosity I asked the director if a prayer meeting had been held, being the Martyrdom Day?  He shyly said, “Oh No. We ought to have done so. In fact it should have been a University event as a whole”.

He then said, “Dr Bedi, I am very disappointed with my students at present. They have started to take things for granted. They know they already have or will get attractive placements. They are not realizing that for many this may well be the last chance of this kind of learning before they start to work and deliver. I do not want to add to the mediocrity in the society. Could you please share some of your thoughts on what more we could do?  How do I improve their value systems for I am seeing a steady erosion? Could you please egg them on to value their time?”

I asked the director, “do you encourage your students to read biographies? Have they read My Experiments with Truth? And do you have such books as a part of the curriculum?” He said, “No”.

“Why don’t you have them”, I asked. For how else do you reach core values?

He said it just did not occur to him. But hereafter he will.

“Good” I said. “Now what is it that you want me to focus on”?

He said, “put fire in their belly.”

I went to the assembly. I instinctively began by asking the students present in the auditorium (nearly 400 of them) if they all had a pen and paper. They said yes. I said, “then pick up a clear sheet and write, “how would I like to be remembered?” I explained: “It is Gandhiji’s Martyrdom Day today…just as we remember him for all he did, how would you like to be remembered”?

They all started to write. There was pin drop silence, for all were taken by surprise. I too was surprised at my own thought. I could feel that it was triggered by my brief conversation with the director.

After they had written I asked the students to put their name on the paper. This too was a surprise for they were under the impression that it was anonymous, hence it may not matter what they write. But I had cautioned them that this was a serious exercise and hence it was not to be taken lightly.

Once written, (including the faculty and the Director), I went down from the stage to collect these. This too was another surprise. They probably were under the impression that the paper was going to stay with them or get lost in anonymity. It was not so! I got each of them collected. 

I took the bunch of papers with me to the podium. The students were wondering what I was going to do next. I now asked them if they if would like to know what some wrote, while keeping the anonymity of course. They all said, yes. They were certainly curious of what others wrote.

I randomly picked one paper out of the bunch and read it out, without mentioning the writer…

It was a bit of a shock! It was totally in tandem with the concerns of the Director. The answer on the sheet was just one word “Bindaas…” In other words, “I don’t care”! It did not matter to him. For him this exercise was a joke. (The writer was a boy, for it was a male name).

Well, this could be an answer. I said nothing but watched the reaction of the students. Surprisingly this left the students dumbfounded. They felt defensive to an extent. I asked them if I may give these responses to the Director. They overwhelmingly said, NO. Now they did not want to be read 

For me, it was a test check of what the Director had said. I then read a few more. One by one they revealed no fire in their bellies! The students themselves realized that this was not what was expected of them. After all the investments which were going into them.

I now spoke to them, conscious that I not sermonize. I was aware they were already into many digit “offered” salaries. Their stomachs were full. They were obviously not interested in remembering others, nor were they concerned with how they are remembered.

But I do feel these young “executives to be”, would not easily forget this day. Perhaps some were left wishing they get another chance to write how they would like to be remembered!

To some extent, the objective was met!
Top

 

Profile
All doors open to Murli Deora
by Harihar Swarup

Illustration by Sandeep JoshiMurli Deora or Murli Bhai, as he is known to his countless friends and admirers, has been a “friend of friends.” His friendship cuts across the political spectrum; he has no visible enemy though he has certainly had critics in his long and variegated political career. Why is Murli Bhai so popular, as he is with the high and mighty, the richest of the land and down the line to the poorest? Those who know him intimately, including this columnist, inevitably come to one conclusion; it is because of his knack of helping people in need or distress.

He has helped innumerable young men get jobs, provided medical relief to the ailing and facilitated the treatment of many poor cancer patients in Bombay’s reputed Tata Cancer Institute. Refer to him a case of an unemployed youth or a patient fighting for his life, and the response would be unbelievably prompt. Murli Bhai has always enjoyed powerful clout in the corridors of power irrespective of which dispensation ruled the country and pulls the strings. He is now himself in the government, having been inducted in the Cabinet as Petroleum Minister.

In the corporate world he has been a much sought after man because he can help captains of industry in the hour of need. His friends include the late Ramnath Goenka, who was his regular bridge partner, the late Dhirubhai Ambani, K K Birla and many front line industrialists. Goenka regularly invited him for a game of bridge at the pent house of Bombay’s Express Towers. Ramnathji, it was believed, may not oblige the highest of the land but would never say “no” to Murli Bhai.

His proximity with Dhirubhai dates back to the late seventies and the creator of the Reliance empire had described him as “a name synonymous with Mumbai’s dynamism and vitality”. Dhirubhai wrote on the eve of the 1999 election: “Murli’s rise in public life has been phenomenal. We began our struggle together sharing common interests in the yearn trade, and often we commuted to work together. I remember those days with nostalgia. Murli Bhai took to politics and I took to business. Over the years, we have continued to meet often, exchange views and update ourselves on current issues. This interaction has increased since Murli Bhai entered Parliament”.

 Yet another doyen of the corporate world, the late JRD Tata, in an appeal on election eve wrote “Murli Deora’s willingness to help small people is well known and makes him the good politician that he is”.

Noted Jurist Nani Palkhivala too was not lagging behind in praising Murli Bhai’s versatility: “Murli has been working along with me as a colleague in the Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Gandhi Institute of Computer Education and Information Technology which is, in fact, his own brain child and which we at the Bhavan readily agreed to adopt. The institute is the first of its kind to launch totally free computer education for the underprivileged and aims at bridging the underemployment gap in a big way”.

Press Magnate Pravinchandra Gandhi called Murli Bhai “A dynamo of a man—a friend in need”. Ramnathji, Dhirubhai and JRD are no more but one wonders how others will be feeling at Murli Bhai’s swearing-in as Petroleum Minister.

 Unlike his predecessor, Mani Shankar Aiyer, Murli Bhai has for long years been maintaining amazing contacts with successive US establishments, cutting across Republican and Democratic party lines. It is believed that irrespective of the political dispensation at the While House, he can have opened many doors in Washington DC. He is sure to have a significant role during President George Bush’s much hyped visit to India next month. In the past he had been host and guide of any American of some consequence visiting the country. Many of them were big names like Bill Gates.

Murli Bhai has also fought for many issues of public interest. As far back as 1999, he filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court asking for restrictions on indiscriminate publicity promoting tobacco and related products. The petition resulted in a series of directions from the court instructing manufacturers to make the statutory warning more visible and placing certain restrictions on cigarette advertising. This was the first such PIL and was the forerunner of many others that ultimately resulted in a series of bans on smoking in public places that included government buildings and aircraft.

True to his character, the first act of Murli Bhai as Petroleum Minister was to call on his predecessor, Mani Shankar Aiyer, in a bid to assuage his hurt feelings. The two thereafter drove to the Ministry in Shastri Bhavan and Aiyer led Deora to the ministerial chair. Murli Bhai’s second act was a meeting with the Marxist leader, Sitaram Yechuri to discuss the issue of pricing of sensitive petroleum products. This followed a categorical assurance from the new Petroleum Minister ruling out immediate increase in LPG and kerosene prices. Deora, during the first day in office, addressed two key problems plaguing the oil sector. His clear cut commitment was “we have to offer subsidies to the poor and make sure that the losses incurred by the PSUs are reduced”.
Top

 

Diversities — Delhi Letter
Fire in the sky
by Humra Quraishi

Paradoxes, if I may say so. Just about yesterday evening, getting back home after hearing a detailed lecture at the IIC by Professor Nadia Al Baghdadi of the Central European University at Budapest, on the havoc that has been happening in today’s Iraq, it was as though one was halted midway.

As I reached Chanakyapuri‘s diplomatic stretch of the French embassy the formations in the skies stood in the way. Huge, colourful formations all over the skies. It just about then struck that that particular evening —February to be precise — France’s Pierre-Alain Hubert, who is considered as one of the greatest pyrotechnic artists, was to hold a show of fireworks hitting the skies so as to say, to celebrate the forthcoming visit of the President of the French Republic, Mr. Jacques Chirac.

And seeing those fireworks often described as "paintings in the skies, opera of light," I couldn’t help but comment on the paradoxes at work. I’d just heard one of the detailed lectures on the tragic turns in Iraq by one of the leading academics that had left one feeling low and upset, then, within ten minutes the glitter one saw right there, up in the skies.

In fact, another addition along the strain — this very French Embassy has been witnessing a series of potent protests by Greenpeace activists — protesting against the entry of Clemenceau in our country — and yet the fireworks hitting the skies, so as to say

It’s really premature to comment whether those fireworks would continue till the French President’s visit. For, not to be overlooked are angry protests, which are going on unabated.

And rightfully so; we third world nations cannot be treated as dumping grounds for toxic wastes and it is time to rise and react. If the government does not do so, the people have to come forth and protest.

Some focus on Kasturba

Moving on. Though the latest book on Mahatma Gandhi — Girja Kumar’s Brahmacharya Gandhi and His Women Associates — is said to be focusing on the women in Mahatma Gandhi’s life yet there is little focus on Kasturba. Never mind. For this coming week there will be much focus on her.

It is the 60th anniversary of the Kasturba Gandhi Memorial Trust and with that her granddaughter Tara Gandhi Bhattacharjee is holding a two day meet at the Gandhi Smriti.

The very invite holds out much hope as it states — "A celebration of the life and message of Kasturba Gandhi," together with this quote of Mahatma Gandhi — "I learnt non-violence from Kasturba."

Of course, there’s no denying that Kasturba Gandhi did play a role in the entire freedom struggle. Maybe, took a backseat and purposely avoided focus on her work and the manner in which she supported her husband.

Power of nationalism

Often I muse, why do we sit and sing long departure songs when the person is gone? In the case of rebel Urdu poet Israr-ul Haq Majaz, he is long gone and was part of the Progressive Writers Movement. But, then, suddenly, from last August there’s been one meet after another on him. The latest focus this week-end is at the India International Centre.

I am writing this several hours before the event so can only leave you with this poet’s haunting lines from his poem titled Awara:

Night has fallen in the city, and I, unhappy and defeated

Roam, a vagabond on dazzling, awake streets

It is not my neighbourhood, how long can I loiter thus?

Anguished heart, desperate heart, what should I do...

To stop and rest on the way is not my habit

To admit defeat and return is not my nature

But to find a companion, alas, is not my fate...

Or these lines from another of his poems tilted Inquilaab (Revolution) which he penned in great anger at the British rule:

The rule of capitalism is about to end

The passion of the workers’ revenge is coming to a boil

Winds bearing the scent of blood will soon blow from the forests...

And on that horizon, amidst a thousand tumults

Shall rise the sun of our land’s freedom.

What men — the so-called progressive writers — we had produced in that era! It is really unfortunate that we have sidelined them and their verses. Such potent verse, what powerful words, enough to surcharge that strong feel for the nation. In fact, before I end I must write what Professor Nadia Al Baghdadi did say in her lecture, in the context of nationalism. She said that the US and the allies did not expect such a stiff and strong opposition from the Iraqis and it probably came from the factor of strong nationalism. This has to be systematically built into the citizens of each nation.
Top

 

If a man voluntarily allows himself to be crushed, he yields the oil of moral energy which sustains the world.

— Mahatma Gandhi

If the garment be considered polluted and impured by a stain of blood, How can the minds of those be deemed pure who suck the blood of human beings?

— Guru Nanak
Top

HOME PAGE | Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Opinions |
| Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi |
| Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail |