|
Will Gadkari deliver in his second term?
Nobody knew Nitin Gadkari before he was made the President of the Bharatiya Janata Party three years ago. He was thrust upon the BJP by the RSS which treats the BJP as its political arm. During his stewardship of the BJP, Gadkari did no wonders. If anything, the BJP has been sliding downhill. By amending the party constitution to let Gadkari conduct the affairs of the BJP a second time in succession at a time when the Karnataka strongman, BS Yeddyurappa, is threatening to quit the party, RTI activist Anjali Damanis has accused Gadkari of being hand in glove with NCP supremo Sharad Pawar in covering up the Rs 72,000 crore irrigation scam and several other problems in the party. The BJP has ruined its chances of emerging either as the ruling party or the leading Opposition party in the coming Lok Sabha elections. This was the time to take advantage of the Congress party’s growing unpopularity because of galloping inflation, “coalgate” and other scams and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s image taking a hit. Alas, the BJP has let the opportunity pass. The BJP needs a charismatic leader like Atal Bihari Vajpayee. True, no one from among the top leaders of the BJP fills the bill, but Gadkari does not even qualify to be a front line leader. All in all, the BJP has made a poor choice and will rue the day it made to hand him over a second term. RJ
Khurana,
|
|
|
Cut govt expenditure Money has to come from somewhere and it does not grow on trees as truly said by the Prime Minister. The Congress backing the Prime Minister’s reform agenda is also fine (news report, September 26). But why nobody talks of curtailing wasteful government expenditure? Shouldn’t it be a part of the economic reforms? Like electricity saved is electricity generated, money saved by cutting expenditure is like income generated. We would bear extra burden imposed on us happily if the tax-payers’ money is not wasted to provide luxurious living to politicians and others. If the Centre and the state governments reduce the expenses incurred on the VIPs, curtail their security cover, cut down the vehicles provided to them and have a relook on the widely misused free power provision. It will save thousands of crores of rupees and a lot of petrol, diesel and electricity. But that is a big if. The talk of the welfare of “aam admi” is only a lip service by those in power. They seem to be more concerned of their own welfare. Wg Cdr CL SEHGAL (retd), JalandharDivisive politics
The BJP indulges in double-speak. The party’s boast that it would roll back the FDI in retail if voted to power is a clever device to keep their vote bank of traders in good
humour. Their belief is, “promises are made to break”, (editorial, “BJP’s rollback talk — it would reflect bad governance”, Sept. 28) This political outfit knows well that economic reforms are inevitable. The intellectuals in the BJP like Arun Shourie are forthright on reforms and rightly so. The editorial has aptly said if some giant retailers set up stores in states ruled by the Congress or other parties that support FDI in retail, how would the BJP force them to shut up their logistics and installations. The BJP’s stand on
FDI, therefore, is far from the ground realities. It is anybody’s guess that coalition politics is there to stay in the country. If the BJP assumes power at the
Centre, it will need coalition partners. Where is the certainty that their partners would permit FDI rollback? Even their present allies are not agreeing to this stand. Punjab is one such state and others may follow suite. Like its Hindutva agenda, the BJP has unwisely created a divide between the traders and the farmers on
FDI. It is a typical example of the BJP’s divisive politics. RM Ramaul,
|
|||
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |