is the most important natural resource, particularly for an agrarian state like Punjab. The magnitude of agricultural activities largely depends upon the quantity and quality of land and the manner in which it is put to use. The state lacks minerals but is endowed with locational advantage of water availability, levelled land and hard-working farmers, due to which, virtually, the entire available land is made fit for agriculture.
Out of a total geographical area of 50.3 lakh hectares, about 41.6 lakh hectares is the net area sown. Led by economic forces, emerging from various genetic improvements of crops and livestock, fast mechanisation, market developments etc, significant structural changes in Punjab agriculture have come about and provided a potential food security cover to the country.
Such transformations have also considerable implications for the livelihood of farmers, landless labour and other sections of society. As a consequence, the barren and fallow lands, which together were 4.39 lakh hectares in 1970-71, declined to merely 0.73 lakh hectares in 2010-11, releasing a sizable land for cultivation.
Till the eighties even the land under roads, paths, river banks, forest cover, shamlaats (panchayat lands) were also put under crops. Thus the coverage under plough has already touched the maximum possible level of 83% of the geographical area and very little scope is left for further increasing agricultural production through horizontal expansion.
An alarming trend
A significant emerging dimension is the reckless increase in the land put to non-agricultural uses, which touched a level of 5.08 lakh hectares in 2010-11 (about 10% of geographical area) as against 3.43 lakh hectares in 1990-91 due to urbanisation and industrialisation. The statistics thus works out to net addition in urban areas by 8,500 hectares per annum, cutting down area from agriculture.
The housing and infrastructure requirements are increasing due to population growth, economic development and industrial expansion. There is no effective check on unplanned expansion of towns, especially due to the in-migration of people from rural areas and from other parts of the country, a swift rise in the number of marriage palaces, farm houses, unmanned colonies etc have lead to the reduction in the highly productive cultivated area in the peri-urban locations. Construction work and the widening of roads, expansion of educational, health, banking and other such activities, expansion of industrial concerns etc do
find justification. This is an alarming trend and calls for urgent policy prescriptions to check the mushroom expansion of towns and cities.
Farm size increasing
The number of land holdings in the state is set to decline (from 11.17 lakh in 1990-91 to 9.97 lakh in 2000-01) by about 6,000 every year. However, it again increased to 10.45 lakh in 2005-06. Still, an overtime comparison of distribution of land holdings indicates an encouraging picture. For example; the marginal land holdings category, which accounted for 37.51% of the total number in 1970-71, came down to 13.42% in 2005-06. Consequently, the percentage of medium and large farms has swelled. Thus the overall average farm size in the state increased from 3.8 ha to 4.2 ha.
On the face of it, the picture appears to be rosy, provided there is a net shift of population from agriculture to the secondary and tertiary sectors or even within farming elsewhere geographically. Even liberalisation of the land lease market, with about 13% of the cultivated area coming under its fold could be one of the reasons for such out-migration. When the data of the population census is also viewed simultaneously, the picture becomes rather reverse and dismal.
During 1991, there were 19.17 lakh cultivators and the number went up to 20.65 lakh in 2001. Therefore, a clear cut indication of increasing pressure of population (by about 15,000 every year) remains unabated with more and more number of cultivators per operational land holding. The possibilities of division of land for convenience sake and for the sake of concealing non-farm income cannot be ruled out. This dilemma needs a serious review and a thorough probe.
Cropping intensity rises
The fallow land, which was 313 thousand hectares in 1960-61, has gone down considerably. The introduction of short duration cultivators and expansion of area under irrigation paved the way for alternative economic use and thus increased cropping intensity. Consequently, cropping intensity has gradually gone up from merely 126 per cent to 190 per cent. The increase in cropping intensity and a decline in barren land has provided it with a vegetative cover for most part of the year and is thus ecologically desirable as it helps check the wind and water erosion. The vertical expansion of area by increasing cropping intensity is still possible. For example, land remains unutilised for about two-three months after the harvest of rabi crops and before sowing paddy, particularly basmati, can be utilized for green manuring and raising other short duration crops like pulses, fodders, etc.
Forest cover
To maintain the ecological balance, check soil erosion, meet the demand of timber and industry, provide firewood and shelter to the habitat and wild life, forests play an important role in the economy. After the reorganisation of Punjab in 1966, most of the forest land went to Himachal Pradesh and only 35 thousand hectares of forestland came to the share of Punjab, but with persistent efforts of the state government, it has touched a level of about 2.9 lakh hectares, accounting for 6 per cent of the geographical area.
A similar situation occurred in case of fruit orchards. The National Forest Policy stressed that for the proper maintenance of balance of nature and to meet the needs of development, 60 per cent of the total area in hills and 20 per cent in the plains should be under forest so that an overall average of 33 per cent is maintained. Furthermore, the forest area in the state is concentrated mainly in semi-hill tracts of Hoshiarpur, Ropar and Gurdaspur districts. On the other hand, some districts like Fatehgarh Sahib and Moga have even less than 1 per cent area under forests.
Though social forestry is not profitable as compared to common crops except in case of marginal lands, yet plantation along roads, rail tracts and river banks can be done more vigorously. The Kandi belt of the state has vast potential of plantation especially the traditional forest and fruit trees. Plantations in parks, schools, hospitals, along roads, canals etc even in the urban areas have still vast potential to be explored.
Policy implications
Land use has important economic and ecological implications. Changes from one use to another are often made to achieve better economic use of land resources. However, many of these changes have a detrimental effect on the natural environment, i.e., conversion of pastures into agricultural land, industrial citing in prime agricultural area, increase in urbanisation, infrastructure etc. It is, therefore, imperative that while formulating land use plans, potential environmental conflicts and corrective measures should be given due consideration. In the context of rising number of cultivators and falling number of operational holdings, real farmers need to be sorted out to check the pilferage of subsidies and evasion of taxes.
Effort should be to put semi-hill tracts of Punjab under agro-forestry as a majority of farmers in such areas are small and marginal and crop productivity is also very low. A corpus fund for advancing cheap loans up to the gestation period of trees is required to encourage agro-forestry in the area. Plantation at public places should also be encouraged. Plantation in urban areas needs a more serious view. Though urbanisation and industrialisation are essential features of growth, the need for a systematic expansion with minimum impairment of agriculture is of still greater importance. Small farmers have a better option of exit due to a reckless rise in land price and escalating land rents. A still greater requirement is the expansion of non-farm sectors to provide them better employment opportunities.
The writer is a former Professor & Head, Department of Economics & Sociology, PAU, Ludhiana.