Thursday,
July 11, 2002, Chandigarh, India
|
Follow CVC model for Vigilance Bureau THE
views expressed by P.H. Vaishnav in his article (June 29) throw some good light on the working of the Punjab Vigilance Bureau but the comments of Joginder Singh (July 2) are apparently based on misunderstanding of true facts. Over the years the Vigilance Bureaus in most states, particularly in Punjab and Haryana have been largely misused by Chief Ministers to frame their personal and political adversaries. Some of the cases are apparently so frivolous that the investigation officers, apprehending adverse strictures by law courts, delay the investigation. For this reason scores of cases have been pending in the Punjab Vigilance Bureau for 10 to 22 years. The conviction rate of the cases registered by the State Vigilance Bureau is only 9.2 % as mentioned by Vaishnav. If officers in the Vigilance Bureau resolve to discharge their duties honestly and in accordance with law, the conviction rate of corruption cases should be more than 90% because less than 10% cases registered by State Vigilance Bureau are such in which public servants are caught red-handed while accepting bribe. Conviction in such cases depends on the oral testimony of the witnesses, whereas in all other cases the criminal misconduct of public servants is to be proved through documentary evidence. Joginder Singh has commented that the Chief Secretary generally protects officers of his “biradari” and he generally delays permission for their prosecution in corruption cases. Police officials are also rarely booked because senior police officials heading the Vigilance Bureau are equally prone to protect their “biradari”. |
|
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |