Wednesday,
June 6, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
Fresh PEC rules to suit
new status
Chandigarh, June 5 Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act says that, “For gaining the status of a deemed university, an institution has to register itself under the Societies Registration Act or the Public Trust Act and should formulate a memorandum of association and rules.” The Act also says that the institutions covered by Section 3 of the UGC Act shall continue to receive the funds for their maintenance and development expenditure, including the salary and non-salary increase in it. Future expansions will be funded through the sources that used to fund the institution before its recognition as a deemed university. The institution will supplement the funds by raising its own resources. A draft of the Memorandum of Association and Rules for the “Punjab Engineering College Society” are to be discussed at a meeting of the PEC heads of departments tomorrow. Once the UT Administration approves these rules, the society will become a registered one. After this, the Administration will issue a notification for transferring all assets and liabilities of the PEC to the society. It will then wait for the Centre to declare the PEC a deemed university. The process will take a year and, till then, the status of the college will remain the same. The service conditions of various categories of employees are likely to be different under the new system. However, the existing employees of the college will get a choice between adopting the new system or continuing with the old one. Students of the city will get 85 per cent reservation in the Chandigarh Polytechnic when it becomes an engineering college in the next session. The reservation in the PEC will be reduced to 70 per cent in the first year and 60 per cent the next year. It will finally be lowered to 50 per cent. The name for the deemed university is yet to be decided. The college might also hold a contest among its students to select this name.
|
Beant case adjourned: next hearing on June
6 Chandigarh, June 5 It all started when UT District and Sessions Judge, Mr
H. S Bhalla, entered the makeshift court room at Model Jail in Burail village. Three of the accused, Jagtar Singh Hawara, Jagtar Singh Tara and Paramjit Singh Bheora, stood up and started raising slogans against the government and in favour of Khalistan. The three continued to raise slogans for over 10 minutes behind the grills in the makeshift court room even as the other accused in the case silently watched while sitting aside on the wooden chairs. The three accused also requested the Judge to permit them to meet the mediapersons present in the court. The demand was, however, rejected by the Judge. This was not the first time when slogans were raised in the court. Earlier also, another accused in the case, Balwant Singh, after admitting his hand in the assassination, had raised slogans in favour of another accused Dilawar Singh. Slogans were subsequently raised in the court by another accused Jagtar Singh Tara. He had also confessed his involvement in the
case. The three advocates, Mr S.K Saxena, Mr R.K Handa and Mr Rajan Malhotra, appeared on the behalf of Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) in the case. They also produced one witness, Vinod. K. Vatas. The Judge adjourned the case for June 6. There are about 460 witnesses in the case and the statement of the about 132 witnesses had already been recorded before the court. Taking note of the security in the makeshift court room at Modern Jail, Mr Justice
V. M. Jain of the Punjab and Haryana High Court had directed that no one would be allowed to enter the makeshift court room with weapons, including fire arms. Pronouncing the orders in the open court, Mr Justice Jain observed that permitting the guards, accompanying the officers conducting court proceedings, to enter the premises with weapons was contrary to law, besides being a security risk. The UT District and Sessions Judge, had also directed the removal of grills and jalis fixed in the court room where the Beant Singh assassination case was being heard. And jalis attached to the grills in the makeshift court room had been removed after the directions from the High Court.
|
High Court timings Chandigarh, June 5 |
Case adjourned Chandigarh, June 5 The complainant, Mrs Harjinder Kaur, a former Deputy Mayor, had filed a case before the court on November 19, 1999, under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. She alleged that Partap Singh Riar openly defamed her by saying that she had illicit relations with senior Akali leaders and a former minister in the Congress. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |