|
Twenty-hour Kabul siege shows Taliban strength |
|
|
NASA unveils design for giant rocket Pak’s flood victims save what they can STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE: A Pakistani retrieves belongings from a floodedroom of his home following heavy rainfall in Karachi. — AP/PTI Special to the tribune
|
Twenty-hour Kabul siege shows Taliban strength Kabul, September 14 It was the longest and most audacious militant attack on the Afghan capital in the decade since the Taliban was ousted from power and a stark reminder of insurgents’ resources and reach as Western forces start to return home. At least 11 civilians were killed, three of them children, NATO-led foreign forces said. The Ministry of the Interior said four policemen died, and that toll was likely to rise. Eleven insurgents also died in the battle, seven of them in the clearing operation inside the building where the attackers were holed up near the US embassy. Four other attackers served as suicide bombers. US Ambassador Ryan Crocker said about six or seven rockets had hit inside the embassy area during the early hours of the attack, launched early on Tuesday afternoon, but said the range meant they had not posed a serious threat. “They were firing from at least 800 metres away and with a rocket-propelled grenade that’s harassment. That’s not an attack,” he said in an interview transcript handed out to journalists in Kabul. The insurgents had holed up in a multi-storey building still under construction and launched their attack by firing rockets towards the US and other embassies and the headquarters of NATO-led foreign forces. Afghan security forces backed by NATO and Afghan attack helicopters fought floor-by-floor in the 13-storey building, which the six insurgents appeared to have booby trapped. They had arrived under burqas in a car packed with explosives and entered the high-rise after shooting a security guard. “As our country is traditional and Islamic, there is a special respect for women and the enemies exploited this to get to the building,” Kabul Police Chief Ayoub Salangi said. — Reuters |
NASA unveils design for giant rocket Washington, September 14 The Obama administration today unveiled its much-delayed general plans for its rocket design, called the Space Launch System, which will cost about $35 billion, according to senior administration sources. It will carry astronauts in a capsule on top and start test launching in six years. The size, shape and heavier reliance on liquid fuel as opposed to solid rocket boosters is much closer to Apollo than the recently retired space shuttles, which were winged, reusable ships that sat on top of a giant liquid fuel tank, with twin solid rocket boosters providing most of the power. It’s also a shift in emphasis from the moon-based, solid-rocket-oriented plans proposed by the George W Bush administration. At first the rockets will be able to carry into space 77 tons to 110 tons of payload, which would include the six-person Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle capsule and more. — AP |
Pak’s flood victims save what they can Pingrio, September 14 For the past two weeks, Kaywall has spent 12 hours a day moving his family’s livestock from his inundated village to the small town of Pingrio in Sindh province in the south. The goats are the only thing he has managed to save from raging waters which swept away his house and belongings. Like many other flood victims, he awaits help from Pakistan’s cash-strapped government. “My house was completely destroyed,” said the construction worker, whose family is stranded. The scene, being played out in many parts of Sindh, was a troubling reminder of floods which ravaged much of Pakistan in late July and August last year. Pakistan’s civilian leaders were slow to respond, leaving the far more decisive military to take charge of rescue and relief efforts, along with international aid agencies. This year, floods have destroyed or damaged 1.2 million houses and flooded 4.5 million acres since late last month, officials and Western aid groups say. More than 300,000 people were made homeless. Frustrations with the government are running high. On Wednesday, 80 men blocked the main road to Hyderabad, the biggest city near the flooded areas. They are demanding help from the authorities. Victims of Pakistan’s flood are at growing risk of potentially fatal diseases, aid groups warned. The director-general of the Sindh Health Department, Hafeez Memon, said there were 2,000 confirmed cases of malaria and the number was likely to rise. A 70-year-old woman lying on the side of a road with plastic bags containing her meagre belongings and her two family buffaloes tied to pegs said she felt helpless. The government, heavily reliant on foreign aid and an $11 billion International Monetary Fund loan to keep the economy afloat, is already stretched dealing with other critical issues like a Taliban insurgency and power cuts. Entire villages are submerged. Only roofs of houses or the tops of trees are visible. Some people who thought they had found shelter were suddenly uprooted by raging waters again. In a vast expanse of water that swallowed up houses and farmland in one area, only part of a blue and white tent was visible. Many wondered how they would survive. Analysts say the government will lose even more credibility if charities tied to Islamist groups are seen as more helpful than the state.
— Reuters |
|
Special to the tribune An Asian community leader in the UK has attracted mixed reactions to her claim that some South Asian families are deliberately having more children in order to claim extra welfare benefits from the government. Under the current UK Government regulations, every family -- regardless of income -- is entitled to an annual cash allowance of £1,055 for the first child and £500 for every child thereafter. Parents with 10-children families may typically claim a minimum allowance of more than Rs 5 lakh a year, regardless of whether the husband and wife are employed. Lahore-born Baroness Shreela Flather, the first Asian woman to receive a peerage, told fellow members of the House of Lords, that South Asian families in their home countries were used to having a large number of children because they represented a safety net in their old age. But in a controversial twist to her argument, she focused on the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis settled in the UK, saying: “The minority communities in this country, particularly the Pakistanis and the Bangladeshis, have a very large number of children and the attraction is the large number of benefits that follow the child. “Nobody likes to accept that, nobody likes to talk about it because it is supposed to be very politically incorrect.” She added, “In their countries of origin, of course, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis and even Indians have large families because there is no safety net. When you get old, it is only your children who are going to look after you. This doesn't apply here -- every old person does have their pension and they will be looked after.” A spokesman for the UK Pakistani Forum supported Lady Flather, commenting: “I would agree with that. They are making more children. When parents are unemployed, they have nothing else to do. It’s a form of entertainment. They spend more time at home, they don't go out, they don't have money for holidays. It's the only form of entertainment they enjoy.” But a spokesman for the Bangladesh Centre in London said he disagreed and described Flather's analysis as “stingy”. The Centre spokesman told the Tribune, “If God chose you to have 10 children or five children, that's it. Some parents pray to God for a son or daughter. She should think in another way, not this stingy way.” Commenting on Flather's assertion that parents with larger families were claiming more benefits from the government, he responded, “Yes, if you have 10 children, you will get more benefits. But when your children grow up and get jobs, they will contribute ( to society) more as well.” Flather, who spoke out in the House of Lords during the second reading of the Welfare Reform Bill, added: “It is about time we stopped using children as a means of improving the amount of money we receive or getting a bigger house. “I really feel that for the first two children there should be a full raft of benefits, for the third child three quarters and for the fourth child a half.” |
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | E-mail | |