|
World Bank names expert on Baglihar
Kishenganga talks inconclusive
|
|
Iraq blasts kill 54
Desecration of Koran: 4 die in stir
|
World Bank names expert on Baglihar
Washington, May 11 The decision to appoint Prof Raymond Lafitte, a civil engineer and professor at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, has been made after “consultation with Governments of India and Pakistan”. Lafitte has been found “suitably qualified” for the job and under the terms of the Indus Water Treaty, his determination will be final and binding, the bank said in a statement. “Prof Lafitte... will be asked to make a finding on differences between the two governments concerning the construction of the Baglihar project,” it said, adding that his findings would be made known in time. The bank is a signatory to the 1960 Indus Water Treaty between the two countries. It was approached by Pakistan for arbitration as it felt that India was constructing the hydropower project over the Chenab in violation of the treaty. The two countries failed to resolve their differences in their talks held earlier this year. The bank had “informed the Governments of India and Pakistan on April 25 that it had determined that it was required to comply with the request” of Islamabad “to appoint a neutral expert under the terms of the 1960 Indus Water Treaty.” — PTI |
Kishenganga talks inconclusive
Lahore, May 11 The Indian side insisted that clause 8 should rule the talks and required both sides to demonstrate a ‘cooperative spirit’, exchange data and sit together to solve problems. The Pakistani side asserted that the dam issue had already assumed the proportion of a dispute during the past 10 years. Pakistan raised its objections in mid-nineties when India had expressed its intention to start the project. Besides, two formal meetings were held in the last six months. India had already provided partial data about the project and Pakistan formalised all its objections. The dam issue, Pakistan believes, has become a ‘dispute’ and should be ruled by clause 9 of the Indus Basin Treaty that legally binds both sides to solve ‘disputes’ and provides a further mechanism in case of failure. The Indian side repeatedly said that the invoking of clause 9 was premature and refused to accept Pakistan’s stance, triggering collapse of the talks, the sources said. Briefing newsmen after the talks, Indus Basin Waters commissioners from both sides said the talks had ended without achieving any ‘convergence of views’. Commissioners Jamaat Ali Shah and D.K. Mehta said though both had agreed to disagree on all six points, they had decided to hold another meeting at the end of this month in New Delhi. The two avoided calling the meeting a complete failure, saying that the decision to continue discussing Pakistan’s objections would not justify such a tag for this round of talks. Both commissioners also said a Pakistan team would visit the Kishenganga dam site in June or July this year and an Indian team would subsequently pay a visit to inspect the Neelum-Jhelum project being built by Pakistan. Mr Shah said high hopes had preceded all such meetings and the one just concluded was no exception. There were expectations to ‘achieve convergence of view’, but it did not turn out to be the case. There were many points on which the Indian side wanted more time to get the relevant information and consult people back home before finalising them. Pakistan agreed to extend the talks and the deadline, but the Indian side had been told in no uncertain terms that it had to be done within the set time-limit (July 15). Mr Mehta denied that the India side had employed delaying tactics by not showing up with fully prepared data about Pakistan’s objections. “India did present required data but Pakistani side raised subsequent questions which needed more detailed information. That is why the Indian side sought time and was granted the same,” he said. He also denied delaying conclusion on the grounds that if Pakistan’s objections were ultimately found to be valid and India had to finally adjust the design, the sooner India got to the conclusion better it would be for it. That’s why there was no use for the Indian side to play the delaying game, he maintained. About the possibility of suspension of work as a goodwill gesture on the part of India, Mr Mehta said the Indus Basin Water Treaty did not have any provision in this regard. |
Baghdad, May 11 At least four explosions went off within about an hour, in the deadliest day since the formation of Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari’s government earlier this month. A first car bomb ripped through a busy bus station in the northern city of Tikrit, killing 31 persons and wounding 70, a police officer said. A curfew was slapped on Tikrit following the blast. A suicide bomber also struck an army recruitment centre in the town of Hawijah, southwest of the northern oil city of Kirkuk, killing 20 persons. Insurgents also detonated two car bombs in Baghdad, one of which targeted a police station in the restive southern district of Dura, killing three persons, an interior ministry official. — AFP |
|
Desecration of Koran: 4 die in stir
Kabul, May 11 Two people were “martyred” at the scene of the demonstration in eastern Jalalabad city and their bodies were taken to the city’s Public Health Hospital, hospital’s Chief Director Fazel Mohammad Ibrahimi told AFP. Another person died at the Medical University Hospital and a fourth dead demonstrator was taken to another hospital in the city, he added. Fortyone injured persons, four in a critical condition, were in the Public Health Hospital and 12 were at the Medical University Hospital while many others were treated for light injuries at both, he said. — AFP |
New Saturn moon spotted
Pasadena, May 11 The moon was spotted earlier this month in the centre of the Keeler gap, making waves in the gap edges as it orbits. Tentatively called S/2005 S1, the moon measures 6.44 km across and is about 136,788 km from the centre of Saturn. More observations are needed to determine the shape of the moon’s orbit but preliminary findings show it is in the middle of the gap, Joseph Spitale, a planetary scientist at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, said. S/2005 S1 is the second moon known to exist within Saturn’s shimmering rings. The other is Pan, which orbits in the Encke gap. All of Saturn’s other known moons are outside the main ring system.
— AP |
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |