Sunday,
December 22,
2002, Chandigarh, India |
|
|
Training
course concludes Ludhiana, December 21 National facilitators from Tamil Nadu, Assam and Haryana imparted training to 19 extension personnel from the development departments of the ATMA districts of Punjab. The newly selected facilitators from Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh also took part in the course as assistant trainers. The training was based on the Coverdale methodology that included a number of neutral task cycles highlighting team building and a systematic approach to perform various jobs. Dr S.P.S. Brar, Director PAMETI, reminded the participants that only timely and quality advice could help in sustaining their credibility among farmers that was now being challenged by the private sector. |
Five singers
shortlisted Ludhiana,
December 21 Nine teams had come to
participate in giddha. The Khalsa College for Women, Sidhwan Khurd,
bagged the first position followed by the team of the Malwa Central
College of Education, Ludhiana, and Ramgarhia Girls College, which
were placed second and third, respectively. The winners would
participate in the finals, to be held in Patiala on January 19. |
|
Mock
CBSE test topper Ludhiana, December 21 Another test in science will be conducted in the first week of February.
OC |
Life term for murder Ludhiana, December 21 “The convict has not been able to show any mitigating circumstances for commission of the offence. Since a valuable life has been lost, the convict does not deserve any leniency,” observed Mr Mahal, while declining the plea of leniency raised by the accused. A fine of Rs 5000 was also imposed on the accused. According to the prosecution, co-accused Jatinder Kumar, alias Ladi, at the instigation of Chhinda, inflicted knife injuries on Ashok Kumar, who succumbed to his injuries. At that time, both accused were allegedly drunk. Co-accused Jatinder was found to be ‘juvenile’ during trial and vide order dated April 17, 2002, the prosecution was directed to prepare a separate challan against him and submit the same before the juvenile court. The accused were booked on Janaury 14, 1989, under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC at the Sadar police station on a statement by Ram Lal, elder brother of the deceased. To prove the guilt, the prosecution examined as many as nine witnesses. The accused pleaded ‘not guilty’. Assailing the prosecution story on certain discrepancies, the defence counsel emphasised that even according to the prosecution, Chhinda had only instigated the co-accused to murder. After appreciating the evidence on record, the court held: “The unfortunate death of Ashok Kumar could have been avoided. Therefore, the accused cannot be absolved of his liability in this case.”
|
Panel rejects PSEB appeal Ludhiana, December 21 Disposing of the appeal by the PSEB, the president of the commission, Justice H.S. Brar upheld the order of the district forum on the basis that the spot checking report, produced by the PSEB as evidence, did not bear the signature of the consumer. “The PSEB also failed to prove that the consumer was present during the spot checking. The report of the ME laboratory, where the energy meter of the consumer was checked, was also without the signatures of the consumer. “As per rules of the electricity board, a notice was to be given to the consumer to be present at the time of checking of the meter in the laboratory”, he said. The order further observed that the PSEB was not justified in raising the demand and the district forum had rightly quashed it. “For the reasons recorded, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the district forum, which is hereby affirmed. The appeal stands dismissed with a cost of Rs 1000,” the commission ruled. OC |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |