Tuesday,
August 14, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
HIGH COURT Chandigarh, August 13 In his petition against the Union of India and other respondents, Sant Eshar Singh of Sangrur district had earlier stated that he, along with other Sikhs, were of the opinion that Nishan Sahib’s symbol had been misused. He had added that the symbol in the movie had been used for looting and other “ignoble purposes”. The petitioner had added that in another scene Amritdhari Sikhs, along with Nihangs, were seen going along with a mob to abduct a Muslim girl. Quoting The Tribune, the petitioner had asserted that as per a report, the movie was spreading hatred among the masses.
Association’s
plea
On a petition filed by the Panipat District Bar Association, seeking directions to the state of Haryana for the construction of a judicial complex at Panipat, Mr Justice S.S. Nijjar and Mr Justice M.M. Kumar of the High Court on Monday issued notice of motion to the respondent. The case will now come up for further hearing along with other related petitions. In their petition, the association had earlier stated that construction work had not commenced even though the High Court, while taking up another petition, had directed the state on March 27, 1996, to provide suitable complexes at Ambala, Karnal, Rohtak, Yamunanagar, Panipat, Rewari, Kaithal and Panchkula. They had added that the District and Sessions Judge too had written a letter stating that the complex at Panipat, housed in an the old building, was causing inconvenience to the judicial officers, the lawyers and the litigants.
Bail plea dismissed
Dismissing the anticipatory bail plea filed by Moga’s President of the District Congress
Committee, Mr Ranvinder Singh in an attempt to murder case, Mr Justice M.L. Singhal of the High Court on Monday directed that a co-accused in the case, Harbans Singh shall be called upon to furnish necessary bail bonds in the event of his arrest. The two were earlier booked by the Punjab police for attempt to murder and other offences under Sections 307, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution, Ranvinder Singh had fired from his .12 bore gun, injuring an accused. Issuing the directions, Mr Justice Singhal observed: “So far as the case of Harbans Singh is concerned, the offence attributed to him is that he fired and the shot hit a khokha. If that is so, it is doubtful if the offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out against him. So it is ordered that in the event of his arrest, the investigating officer shall call upon him to furnish bail bonds”.
Order to produce
transcript
Directing counsel for three accused in the Kandahar hijacking case to produce before the Court the transcript of tape conversation, Mr Justice K.S. Garewal of the High Court on Monday fixed August 17 as the next date of hearing in the case. In their petition, Abdul Latif of Mumbai, Bhupai Man Damai of Nepal and Dalip Kumar Bhujel of West Bengal, had earlier sought directions for staying the proceedings before the trial court during the pendency of their revision petition. Their counsel had stated that the court had declined to direct the prosecution to supply legible copies of the documents. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |