Wednesday,
July 25, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
Counselling
for BE, B.Arch courses from Aug 7 Chandigarh, July 24 This was decided by the joint admission committee which met at the Panjab University here today after the Punjab and Haryana High Court permitted Punjab Engineering College to carry on with the process of counselling for 85 per cent seats in the UT pool after having vacated the stay earlier granted by it. The rest of the admission schedule will, however, remain the same and will be advertised for the information of public. Pronouncing the orders, the Bench, comprising Mr Justice Amar Bir Singh Gill and Mr Justice Swatanter Kumar, however, clarified that the counselling would be subject to the final decision on the writ petition. The judges also admitted the case for further hearing before a Division Bench on August 20. Earlier during the proceedings, counsel for the state of Punjab stated that they had nothing to say in the matter as relief was not being sought by the petitioners from them. He added that an affidavit in this regard would also be filed. The high court had earlier stayed counselling for 85 per cent of the seats in the UT pool on a petition filed by a Ludhiana resident, Mr Harsimran Singh. In his petition, Harsimran Singh had sought directions for quashing the admission criterion adopted by the Chandigarh Administration for admission to the first year of Bachelor of Engineering course. |
M.Phil entrance test on Aug 6 Chandigarh, July 24 |
Vacant seats to be filled Chandigarh, July 24 He said since the admissions were still open, a list of the number of seats lying vacant in these categories in various schools could not be made available to the public. Moreover, any decision regarding de-reservation of these seats would be taken only when the
admission process was over after the compartment results were declared. |
Lively show by
GGSSSS students Chandigarh, July 24 He said that each and every teacher and student of the city should be involved for achieving the target of 100 per cent literacy in the city. Students presented a lively cultural programme. General Jacob gave away prizes to students. The chairman of the school, Mr Joginder Singh Sawhney, read out the annual report. |
De-reservation: PU seeks legal opinion Chandigarh, July 24 Yesterday during the admissions some students had demanded that the vacant UT pool seats be made available for the general pool students. The students have been asked to contact the Principal, DAV College, Sector 10, by three in the afternoon to find out about these admissions. |
HIGH COURT Chandigarh, July 24 Pronouncing the orders, the Bench, comprising Mr Justice Amar Bir Singh Gill and Mr Justice Swatanter Kumar, however, clarified that the counselling would be subject to a decision of the writ petition. The Judges also admitted the case for further hearing before a Division Bench on August 20. Earlier during the proceedings, counsel for the said state of Punjab to he had nothing to say in the matter as relief was not being sought by the petitioners from him. An affidavit in this regard would also be filed. The High Court had earlier stayed counselling for 85 per cent of the seats in the UT pool on a petition filed by Ludhiana resident, Harsimran Singhm who had sought directions for quashing the admission criterion adopted by the Chandigarh Administration for admission to the Bachelor of Engineering (first year) course. Claiming the criterion to be “less favourable” for students belonging to the state of Punjab, the petitioner had stated that as per the prospectus issued by the engineering college 320 seats out of total 385 had been reserved for candidates who had passed the qualifying examination and had completed 10 + 1 and 2 from schools and colleges situated in the city. This policy of reserving the seats under the UT pool was liable to be quashed as it arbitrary, discriminatory and without jurisdiction, besides being against the Punjab Reorganisation Act of 1966, the petitioner had claimed. Giving details, his counsel had added that the Chandigarh Administration, had no jurisdiction or authority under the Act, to frame the admission criteria less favourable to students residing in Punjab.
Death sentence on
3 killers confirmed
In just over seven years after eight residents of a village in Ferozepore district were killed over a land dispute, a Division Bench of the High Court today confirmed the death sentence awarded to three convicts in the case. The three — Bachitter Singh, Malook Singh and Amarjit Singh of Dholewala village — were booked by the Punjab Police for murder and other offences under Section 302, 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code on April 19, 1994 after the bodies of the eight victims were discovered. The accused, when confronted with the incriminating evidence against them, had, however, denied the allegations. Claiming to have been implicated in the case, they had asked for a trial. After going through the evidence and the documents, Ferozepore’s Additional District and Sessions Judge had sentenced them to death penalty after holding them guilty of the offence. The order was today confirmed by the High Court Bench, comprising Mr Justice H.S. Bedi and Mr Justice A.G. Garg.
Summons to police
in abduction case
Issuing notice of motion on a petition filed by a Ropar district resident seeking the implementation of court orders directing Punjab’s Director-General of Police to consider the advisibility of placing two Deputy Superintendents of Police under suspension while granting them pre-arrest bail in a 1993 abduction case, Mr Justice V.M. Jain of the High Court today asked a senior police officer to be present in the court along with relevant record. Issuing the directions on a petition filed by Kamaljeet Kaur — wife of missing transporter Sukhdev Singh alias Sukha, Mr Justice Jain ordered that the senior functionary, from the DGP’s office, should be present in the court along with the file pertaining to the implementation of the court’s order. Earlier during the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner Mr Navkiran Singh submitted that the court, while passing the orders on April 4, had directed the DGP to consider the advisibility of placing DSP Ramesh Chander and Jagtar Singh under suspension, but no action has been taken. Kamaljeet Kaur, in her petition, had earlier alleged that her husband, Sukhdev Singh of SAS Nagar, was directed to come to Sohana police station before being detained at different places. Her counsel had added that Sukha’s whereabouts were unknown and there was a strong apprehension regarding his elimination. Referring to a report by the CBI, she had added that certain police officers had been found guilty of abducting her husband. She had added that as per the CBI’s report her husband had been eliminated but the date, time and place of the encounter could not be ascertained.
Notice on SGPC poll
On a petition seeking directions to the Union of India and other respondents to fix the date for holding elections to Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, a Division Bench of the High Court today issued notice of motion for September 10. In his petition taken up by Mr Justice S.S. Sudhalkar and Mr Justice A.K. Goel, SGPC member Hardeep Singh had earlier stated that the elections were last held on October 13, 1996, for a five-year term. He had added that the elections should be held on time so that the newly elected members could taken up office. Old members should not be permitted to enjoy the term after the expiry of the five-year period due to sheer negligence on part of the respondents.
|
HC directive on polythene bags Chandigarh, July 24 Pronouncing the orders in the open court, the Bench, comprising Mr Justice G.S. Singhvi and Mr Justice M.M. Kumar, observed: “On the next date of hearing, counsel for UT Administration, Mr Rajan Gupta, and counsel for the Municipal Corporation of Chandigarh, Ms Deepali Puri, should inform the court about the measures taken by the Administration and the corporation to check the spread of garbage in the city”. The Judges further observed: “Mr Gupta will also seek instructions on the issue of banning the use of polythene bags in the entire area covered under the Periphery Act”. Taking up a similar petition on the condition of roads and streetlights in the city, the Bench has also asked the Administration and other respondents to give details of the load of vehicles on the roads from 1971, besides supplying information regarding the number of vehicles registered in the city from that year.
Notice to PGI On a writ petition filed by a former Assistant Professor in PGI’s Department of Surgery, Dr Ajay K. Sharma, challenging his termination from service, a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notice of motion to the respondents for October 29. Pronouncing the orders in the open court, the Bench, comprising Mr Justice K.S. Kumaran and Mr Justice J.S. Khehar, observed that the appointments, if any, would be subject to the final decision of the writ petition. In his petition, Dr Sharma had earlier stated that he had applied for one year’s extra-ordinary leave after an offer was received from the UK for further training in pancreas transplantation and non-heart beating donor programme. He added that his application was kept hanging even though he was verbally asked to proceed. His counsel had asserted that the petitioner left the city for his foreign assignment after handing over an application seeking grant of leave in case extra-ordinary leave was refused to him. Counsel claimed that after four months, the petitioner was informed that he was being treated as willfully absent from duty and he should rejoin within a week even though the governing body of the PGIMER had decided to terminate his services.
Notice of motion Taking up a petition filed by nine wards of Panjab University employees against the decision of the respondents to deny them admission in Punjab Technical University in seats reserved for their category, Mr Justice Amar Bir Singh Gill and Mr Justice Swatanter Kumar of the high court on Tuesday issued notice of motion for August 30. The students, in their petition, had earlier sought directions to the university and other respondents to consider them for admission on the ground of their being the wards of PU employees. They had added that the condition of passing 10 + 1 and 2 from colleges in the state of Punjab was not applicable in their case. They had further added that even though there was no change in the admission criterion, the students were being denied admissions.
|
Notice of motion issued
on allottee’s plea Panchkula, July 24 In their petition, Mr Marya and others, who were allotted MIG ‘A’ category flats in Panchkula’s Sector 11, had challenged the charging of 12 per cent compound interest since 1982. Earlier, the allottees had filed a petition, wherein the escalation in cost of flats was challenged in 1984, which was dismissed in 1998. Thereafter, the respondent started charging compound interest for non-payment of amount, from 1982 till date, while preparing the accounts for the statement. In this petition, the counsel for the allottee contented that the respondent could not charge interest over the amount during the period of the stay by the court when the petitioners were paying the installment according to the estimated cost. It was further stated that the board was not empowered to charge 12 per cent compound interest either under the Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971, or under the Housing Board Haryana (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1972. After hearing the counsel, Mr Ashok Sehgal, the Bench passed an order for supplying the account statement to the petitioners, enabling them to make the payment of principal amount with 12 per cent simple interest within two months. |
Flesh trade racket: four remanded Panchkula, July 24 The court granted bail to Ajmer Singh, Rajbir, Sunita and Gita, while Raju Gupta, Anil Arora, Seema and Shalu were sent to 14 days’ judicial remand. Their bail application would come up for hearing tomorrow. Eight persons, including four women, were arrested in this connection on July 22 after the police raided two locations in Sector 21 and Sector 15 of the city following a tip-off. Two constables were sent as decoy customers at both places. Police investigations revealed that Ajmer Singh and Anil operated as pimps and supplied girls to clients in Panchkula and around. The police has registered cases under Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Trafficking Act at the Sector 5 and 19 police stations. |
Notice
issued to UT Home Secy Chandigarh, July 24 |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |