E D I T O R I A L P A G E |
Tuesday, March 30, 1999 |
|
weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
|
Close
to a catastrophe RETURN
OF SALMAN RUSHDIE |
What
to do during an earthquake A
Ministry geared to defending George The
monkeys delight
Plague
in Lahore |
Close to a catastrophe THE earthquake that shook a large part of North India on Sunday night was of severe intensity and had, therefore, much greater destructive potential in terms of life and property than what we have come to know of by now. It measured 6.8 on the Richter scale and came abruptly at dead of night. The duration was more than 40 seconds. Seismologically speaking, the affected areas fall in Zone 5 of the country which has been classified as very quake-prone. The epicentre has been located near Chamoli in Garhwal. In fact, mild tremors started at midnight around Gopeshwar and there were at least 14 of them until the biggest one was felt. It is worth remembering that during the recent past the rudeness of the shocks at various places was less frightening Jabalpur 6, Latur 6.3 and Uttarkashi 6.6 on the Richter scale. Hundreds of lives were lost in those areas. Those who believe in Providence would naturally thank their stars. In our region, Chandigarh, Shimla and Jalandhar have shown much panic reaction. A natural calamity does not warn; it strikes. One needs to learn many lessons from such happenings. Despite remarkable scientific advancement, it is not possible to forecast the occurrence of earthquakes accurately. A note of caution issued even a decade in advance has to be considered with due reservation. One should treat Japan as a model. It is far more quake-prone than India, but it still escapes earthquake fury with far less damage. One reason, of course, is that we cannot spend adequately on making quake-resistant buildings. The shortage of money is a major discouraging factor in a poor country like ours. It is necessary that we start building structures according to the required specifications in places like Uttarkashi and keep an eye on the construction of dams. Earthquakes have killed
more than 10,000 people in the country during the past
nine years or so and adversely affected about 400
million, according to a recent survey. Two-thirds of
India lies in the seismic zones of moderate to severe
intensity. On an average, at least one major disaster
hits us every year causing considerable loss of life and
property. According to some definite data collected by
geologists at Roorkee, the Himalayan range, the
Indo-Gangetic plains, and the Kutch and Kathiawar regions
of western India are geologically at risk. The Himalayan
front arc, flanked by the notorious Chaman
fault in the west, constitutes the most seismically
active intra-continental belt in the world where four
earthquakes attaining the magnitude of 8 on the Richter
scale have occurred within a span of 53 years. The
Andaman and Nicobar Islands have also been identified as
vulnerable to earthquakes. Peninsular India is considered
rather quiet because it is away from the tectonic
activity of the boundaries. The geo-physical signatures
of Sunday nights tremors are ominous. They can be
repeated and people specially the old, the infirm
and the handicapped have to be placed under
reasonable safety. Public awareness is essential and
community help is the main source of sustenance in the
hour of need. One hopes that the affected would receive
all support and help. |
Sensexs higher range LAST week was particularly bad for the Bombay Stock Exchange, sentiment-wise. After creeping up by 41 and 44 points on the first two days, the Sensex plunged by more than 150 points on Wednesday as a nervous reaction to the virtual dismissal of BSE president J.C. Parekh. On Friday too pessimism prevailed and the upshot was a further loss of 86 points. Despite this huge shedding, the weeks closing figure was impressive at 3597 points. In fact, the movement of the Sensex these days is mostly in the range of 3600-3800 points, a big improvement over the 2900-3200 range some months back. A bit of analysis strengthens the impression that the band of Sensex movement has indeed shifted higher. Last week the scrips of super blue chip companies like software exporters dived in value. Of course, these very shares had set and later sustained the bull run. Most of the shares are selling at irrationally high prices, often 100, 200, 300 or 400 times the face value of Rs 10. Infosys, which has excited the hard-nosed investors in Nasdaq in the USA, commands a price of upwards of Rs 4500. At that level, it is not an investors option but a speculators favourite. Also, it is a very hot property. A buyer wants to hold on to these shares for the shortest duration and make the highest profit. When everyone plays this game, volatility becomes the basic sentiment of the market. This fact comes out in the swinging fortunes of the companies. Last week prices of all these shares tumbled, in one case by as much as 22.8 per cent. Even the mighty Infosys lost 6.8 per cent. Another welcome feature is the large volume of turnover and a healthy mixture of shares, both within the A group and with B 1 and B groups. B 1 prices went up by an average of 43 per cent taking the total value of all shares to Rs 16,000 crore and B group prices were up by 10 per cent to nearly Rs 150,000 crore, all during last week. More shares were traded, reflecting new found enthusiasm. All this does not mean that the small investor has finally returned to the market. The booming sale of gold and small savings instruments shows where his preference lies. But the growth impulse is getting entrenched and if a few top companies report good performance in the last quarter of the financial year, the market should respond favourably. The behaviour of the
Indian bourses was becoming somewhat scandalous during
the past two years or so. While the battered South-East
and East Asia were rapidly picking up the snapped thread
of market revival, India went into a prolonged spell of
stagnation. Both South Korea and Hong Kong have recouped
50 per cent of the losses, and their losses in the middle
of 1997 were enormous. The Dow Jones index of Wall Street
is hovering around 10,000 points, a hefty 30 per cent
rise in one year. That is an investors market,
where money grows steadily, outstripping inflation and
yielding real and attractive returns. In India that is a
distant goal, but an early end to the stranglehold of
speculators is no mean achievement. |
Signals from Orissa THE ride up to the Assembly elections in Orissa is unlikely to be comfortable for Chief Minister Giridhar Gamang. Mr J.B. Patnaik, whom he replaced at the behest of the Congress high command, has already unfolded a gameplan for causing dissension and confusion within the Congress. At a certain level it is an unfair contest because Mr Patnaik is a hardened politician while Mr Gamang is still a novice in power politics. That the Patnaik loyalists who were not included in the reconstituted ministry would make life difficult for the Chief Minister is understandable. However, reports from Bhubaneswar suggest that the pro-Patnaik Ministers too are not letting Mr Gamang feel comfortable. Of course, the developments in the Congress cannot yet be called close to an open revolt. However, if the Central leadership ignores the signals, the Congress may find it difficult to defend its turf during the Assembly poll. For the present, the Patnaik camp seems to have overlooked a vital fact while planning its move against the Chief Minister. It has not realised that Mr Gamang's lack of political craftiness may turn out to be his strength. This may not only see him survive but also gain in confidence and stature in the run-up to the Assembly elections. The post-Christian bashing tension, economic and social backwardness and the spectre of a severe drought looming over the Orissa horizon are issues which need deft handling. Mr Gamang has already announced a number of initiatives. But if he were to rely only on the Congress to see him through what is undoubtedly a critical phase in his political career, he may find himself being pushed in the wrong direction. Mr Gamang has, instead,
done what most leaders in his situation should do for
tiding over seemingly intractable problems. He has
announced the setting up of an all-party committee to
deal with burning issues and ensure communal harmony. In
effect, he has made the representatives of the people in
the State Assembly collectively responsible for seeing
Orissa out of its current phase of problems some
of which are the result of outside factors. The all-party
committee would advise the government on sensitive
issues, including the post-Staines communal tension. His
straightforward reply to the Opposition's criticism of
his handling of the law and order situation would have
had an impact on even his most rabid adversary. He said
that he was neither guided by anybody in dealing with the
issue nor was he following a hide-and-seek policy. Having
put the onus of tackling the problems facing the state on
the all-party committee, Mr Gamang has inadvertently
given himself political insurance against an attack from
the Brutus within the ruling party. However, Mr Patnaik
is too crafty a politician and he is unlikely to give up
efforts to avenge his humiliation by the high command. In
case the battle for supremacy in the Orissa Congress is
fought at the highest level in Delhi, Mr Gamang is sure
to have the advantage of Ms Sonia Gandhi's support. |
RETURN OF SALMAN RUSHDIE I TRUST, in less than a years time, the Vajpayee government carrying on its bent back a pack of disparate and desperate mavericks ranging from the indispensable Amma of Chennai to the shrill-mouth worked-up firebrand of West Bengal has made hardly a move which is not calculated to keep it from going under at the fall of a sneeze. Gone are the BJP-RSS claims of idealism and sacrifice; craven compromises and rank opportunistic low pragmatism have been duly installed as the new deities! Lurching from crisis to crisis its webbling its way almost on borrowed time from week to week. For such a cornered, shaken government to grant a visa to the celebrated and controversial novelist, Salman Rushdie, (when the earlier so-called secular governments had tamely submitted to the tyranny of the religious zealots) naturally raises a whole lot of doubts, surmises and fears. The RSS eggheads and hotheads, we know, never do a thing without a hidden agenda, and right now, they are desperately in search of a ploy that could bring things back to the boil to enable its fascist cadres yet another moment of history. Already, suitable noises are being made about the right of the Indian government to give a visa to one of its distinguished emigre sons, as also the right to cancel it if the circumstances later warranted it (as conveniently/suggested by Mukhtar Naqvi the BJPs Muslim minister). So, the usual game of hunting the foxes and running with the hounds is on. Or, to recall, Mark Antonys words from Julius Caesar Mischief, thou art afoot... So, we indeed are intrigued by the right and sensible move made by a wrong and dubious government! What are, in sum, the designs? Its not difficult to see the figure in their tattered carpet, but till the actual event itself the return of the native we could rather hold back our powder. Since, very clearly, the Rushdie affair is a volatile, inflammable political issue, any discourse on his achieved work would certainly draw us into a long polemics regarding the nature of art, of politics, of freedom, of the limits of faith etc, and for such a discourse we would naturally examine his major novels, including, of course, The Satanic Verses. For a great writers oeuvre and worldview have to be placed alongside any book that has caused a lethal controversy and still keeps stoking the fires of fundamentalism in retrospect. Our purpose in this kind of piece is, therefore, not to examine the entire body of his work even briefly, but to highlight the problematics of the case which has caused such an amount of unwarranted, distasteful controversy. Indeed, since the Khomeini fatwa 10 years ago, laffaire Rushdie has become a global human issue of immense dimensions and immense complexities. To begin with, one comes up against two equally difficult and perplexing questions: (a) Whats indeed, the limit of freedom in the realm of creative literature and act? (2) Whats the limit of opinion in such writings that challenge the scriptural truths of one faith or another? In sum, what kind of departure from the received, revered text becomes a clerical heresy and a fundamentalists powder, and what kind of deviation becomes a wanton and wilful assault on the corporate spirit of a people or community? Can we, in other words, define the limits either way, or suggest a balancing factor, a drawn line beyond which any transgression becomes unbearably provocative or obscene? I fear, in such matters, we are apt to be walking on very thin ice. For one mans freedom is seen as another mans spiritual invasion and angst. In the West, such problems of religious heresy and apostasy were solved, more or less, with the Enlightenment so far as the writers and artists were concerned, though, to be sure, the politics of power relating to the church or religion remain, in some cases, as virulent and destructive as in the past. The inquisitional aspect is gone, but the inter-faith rivalry or vendetta still flourishes as in the case of the divided Ireland. Still, few writers in the Western world are in danger of being assaulted, quartered and drawn for their bold, heretical, revolutionary writings. There are books and even films on the life of Jesus Christ which paint him in most offensive and hurtful colours. The critics are free to demolish such writers, challenge their new idols, but the quarrels, in general, are confined to intellectual arguments, debates and discourses. The question of ostracization and punishment is not even brooked. In a different way, this question can be seen operating in relation to pornography or downright, deliberate obscenity in literature, art, cinema, etc. From D.H. Lawrences Lady Chatterleys Lover to several later novels, plays and blue films, the battle with the censors and in the law courts has resulted chiefly in the vindication of the writer, or of the artists freedom to interpret the human reality, including the questions of God, atheism, heresy, obscenity in sexual scenes, etc. Which question extends in our own context to the criticism of Hindu sculpture in the greatest works of temple art and architecture as in the Sun-Temple of Konark, or in the Ajanta and Ellora caves. So in Oriental countries, in general, while we defend with passion our artistic heritage even with strong erotic motifs, quite a few puritanical pundits are prepared to burn down cinema-houses showing a lesbian story such as Fire. Our institutionalised ethics and institutionalised hypocrisies run alongside each other, queering the political pitch. Im reminded of what Milan Kundra (whom, incidentally Rushdie admires) said in his novel, The Book of Laughter and Forgetting (1979): Politics unmasks the metaphysics of private life, private life unmasks the metaphysics of politics. As I said at the outset, Im not discussing here the merits or lapses of Rushdies controversial book, which as a novel, in any case, hasnt the magic and power of his Booker Prize Midnights Children, but the mind and motives of a government not known for its humanist, liberalist or modernist outlook. What, indeed, is the game the Vajpayee government is really up to? Is it a last desperate attempt to touch the raw nerve of Indian communalism once again, and return to the Babri Masjid ethos or miasma, keeping in view the fear of another mid-term election? Or, it is to prove its liberal credentials in the eyes of the world with the Christian community in India now under siege, thanks to its own rabid ranks and saffron brigades. Theres no doubt at all in my mind regarding the inalienable right of Salman Rushdie to visit the country of his birth, or, for that matter, any country. The point in question is the wholly uncharacteristic gesture of a government whose ideology and history hardly inspire confidence. Anyway, its still a welcome step, the mixed motives notwithstanding. I hope to deal separately with his major novels where the critique would be comprehensive enough to let the leader have an overview of Rushdies values and world-view, as also of the gothicism of his art, and the picaresque character of his troubled, gnarled, narrative techniques, and, above all, of his polished rhetoric. For its only in art that a creative writers imagination of ambiguities and ambivalences, of point-counter-point, of polarities and hidden perceptions may truly be seen at work and at play. The point Im trying to emphasise is that at some bend in his extended work, the writers faith and politics, among other things, become self-reflective mirrors authenticating his labours as an artist and his miseries as a thinker, believer or non-believer. The technique itself becomes the vision. When a writer chooses to tell truth through fantasy, as a New York Times critic observed in relation to Rushdies convoluted realism, one has to be wary to get at the truth. While I welcome the
return of the native, and wish him a fruitful,
untroubled sojourn in these parts, Im unable to
give the Vajpayee government more than a reluctant cheer
or two. |
Misconceived policy for women THE wild mood-swings of this government on the issue of violence against women are truly stunning. From threatening to make rape punishable with the death penalty, no less, it has decided to issue an insurance policy compensating women for disabilities arising from rape. This unique policy, called the Rajrajeshwari Mahila Kalyan Bima Yojna, was drummed up, according to the General Insurance Corporation of India, by Mr Atal Behari Vajpayee himself. He launched it as his governments first anniversary gift to the women of India. It is one of the two new schemes the other being the Bhagyashree Child Welfare Policy, which provides compensation in case of the death of a parent which the GIC will vigorously promote in the coming months. The GIC will franchise the two policies, and plans to spend as much as Rs 1 crore on advertising them. It will sell them through gram panchayats and grameen banks as part of an innovative marketing strategy. Rajrajeshwari involves a premium of Rs 15 a year and will pay Rs 12,500 for the loss of a limb or an eye (how generous !) and Rs 25,000 for a permanent disability caused to the policy-holder on account of rape. The GIC aims to make as much as Rs 10 crore a year in premium income alone. Womens groups have registered a strong protest against the scheme and demanded that it should be withdrawn. They are right. The whole idea of insuring women against rape is fraught with dangers especially when the state promotes it. It amounts to a grave dereliction of duty to protect women against this particular form of violence and to create conditions that are conducive to the ending of discrimination against women. The fact that the state is cynically doing this, amidst the worst crime wave we have ever witnessed, makes its culpability particularly grave. The scheme is fundamentally misconceived. It is based on the idea that what women are being insured against is something natural, inevitable or routine, like death or illness. You have to die one day. Eventually, you will fall ill too. But we know that rape is neither inevitable nor normal. It is the product of specific circumstances that are within the realm of human or social control. Nor is rape like an accident or an act of God, or a natural calamity against which one insures oneself simply because there is no other defence. An accident is by definition an unexpected or unforeseen event, one that can happen randomly to anyone. Rape is nothing of the sort. It is a specific act of violence directed at a particular woman by a particular man. It is totally immoral to see rape as something we have to live with. It is equally impermissible to treat it as some kind of disability, or as an act usually resulting in a disability, as the GIC is doing. Typically, rape does not lead to the loss of a limb or an organ, but involves long-lasting mental trauma, pain and hurt to a womans dignity and self-esteem. It is extremely doubtful if the GIC or any other insurance company could be even remotely sensitive to such issues and can translate mental trauma or pain into monetary figures. At the heart of Rajrajeshwari is unpardonable confusion over the entity that is being insured and over precisely what a woman is being compensated for. For all intents and purposes, the infelicitously named Rajrajesh-wari policy will amount to marketing rape and cashing in on the growing insecurity and fear of sexual assault among women. Crimes against women have been rising at 10 per cent-plus a year. But no woman will feel secure or fortified as a result of possessing Rajrajeshwari. Rather, she is likely to feel lessened, cheapened, humiliated vulnerable and disempowered. If the purpose of the policy is not just to generate profit for the GIC, but to create conditions that enhance womens security, or generally improve law and order, then it is bound to be defeated. There is another problem
pertaining to the working of the policy and establishing
that the event against which the insurance was sought
indeed took place. What reason can the citizen have to
believe that the GIC will be easier to satisfy than the
police or the law, courts who doubt and reject most
womens claims of sexual assault? According to the
National Crime Records Bureau, the rate of conviction in
reported rape cases (over 12,000 in 1995) is only 30 per
cent . And we know from numerous surveys by organisations
like RAHI (Recovering and Healing from Incest), Sakshi
and others that more than half of all cases of rape are
just not reported to the police and hence not recorded at
all. |
What to do during an earthquake EVERYBODY in the region experienced the tremors after midnight. For us it was a new experience, though many others have had to live with this phenomenon for long. Here is some information on earthquakes taken from various sites on the Internet: During the Earthquake Recognise it for what it is and dont panic. If youre indoors, stay there. Get under a desk or table, stand in a corner or in a doorway. If youre outside, stay there, too. But get away from trees, buildings, walls or power lines. If youre in a high-rise building, dont use the elevators. Stay away from the outside walls. If youre driving, pull over and stop. Stay away from overpasses and power lines. After the Earthquake Check for injuries. If there are any, apply first aid. Dont move seriously injured people unless they are in immediate danger. Dont use the phone unless its an emergency a serious injury or fire. Check for gas and water leaks, broken electrical wiring or sewage lines. If you find damage, turn off the utility at the source. Check your water supplies. You can get emergency water from water heaters, melted ice cubes, toilet tanks (not bowls; and dont drink tank water if youre using a disinfecting agent there) and canned vegetables. Drinking pool water over a long period isnt advisable. Likewise, water stored in vinyl plastic containers isnt suitable for continued use. If the electricity is out, turn on a transistor for immediate news. If you have broken windows, tape them to prevent flying glass in case of aftershocks. Keep the streets clear for emergency vehicles. Keep at least a quarter tank of petrol in your car and maps in the glove compartment. Check for structural damage to your home. If you have to evacuate, leave a note. Remember: Strong aftershocks are likely after a strong earthquake. Planning is the best insurance Teamwork is also a key to surviving an earthquake. In Scotts Valley, USA, an isolated area near the epicentre of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, pre-planning by a group of residents saved houses and possibly lives. The neighbours learned the layout of each others homes and exchanged keys and telephone numbers. They set up caches of food, water and emergency supplies. Stephanie Mann, author of Safe Homes, Safe Neighbourhoods offers advice on organising such a group. Neighbours can do a lot for each other after an earthquake. They may rescue your child or pull you out of debris. Its important to know if there is a doctor, nurse or fire fighter in the neighbourhood. You also need to help your neighbours. If one house goes, the whole block can go. Neighbours should distribute an emergency neighbourhood map with names, telephone numbers and symbols for gas and electricity. Some frequently asked questions and answers The following are some of the frequently asked questions about earthquakes: What is the biggest earthquake ever? Since 1900, the earthquake in Chile on May 22, 1960, is the biggest in the world with magnitude 8.6 on Richter scale. What is the worst earthquake in India? Indias worst earthquake in recent times killed nearly 10, 000 persons in western India in 1993. I want to move to a place that doesnt have earthquake. Where can I go? Antarctica has the least earthquake of any continent, but small earthquake can occur anywhere in the world. What is the difference between magnitude and intensity? Magnitude measures the energy released at the source of the earthquake. The magnitude of an earthquake is determined from the logarithm of the amplitude of waves recorded on a seismogram at a certain period. Intensity measures the strength of shaking produced by the earthquake at a certain location. Intensity is determined from effects on people, human structures, and the natural environment. Intensity does not have a mathematical basis, but is based on observed effects Where can I buy a Richter scale? The Richter scale is not a physical device, but a mathematical formula. The magnitude of an earthquake is determined from the logarithm of the amplitude of waves recorded on a seismogram at a certain period. What is an aftershock? Smaller earthquake following the largest earthquake of a series concentrated in a restricted crystal volume. How long can an earthquake shake? Two to three minutes. What is a fault? A fracture or zone of fractures in rock along which the two sides have been displaced relative to each other parallel to the fracture. I just felt an earthquake. Is there a fault there? If there wasnt one before, there is one now. When was the first instrument that actually recorded an earthquake? Probably the earliest seismoscope was invented by the Chinese philosopher Chang Heng in A.D. 132. This was a large urn on the outside of which were eight dragon heads facing the eight principal directions of the compass. Below each dragon head was a toad with its mouth opened toward the dragon. When an earthquake occurred, one or more of the eight dragon-mouths would release a ball into the open mouth of the toad sitting below. The direction of the shaking determined which of the dragons released its ball. The instrument is reported to have detected an earthquake 400 miles away that was not felt at the location of the seismoscope. The inside of the seismoscope is unknown: most speculations assume that the motion of some kind of pendulum would activate the dragons. Where do earthquakes occur? Earthquake can strike any location at any time. But history shows they occur in the same general patterns year after year, principally in three large zones of the earth. Can earthquake be predicted? It is not possible for
scientists to predict earthquake now and it may never be
possible. Some people believe that animals and psychics
can predict earthquake, but that has not been proven. |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | | Chandigarh | Business | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |