Is Pakistan a democracy?
MOST US newspapers did not cover
the end-game of Pakistan's aggression against India,
which tells the compelling story of Pakistan's
misadventure and lies. It is crystal clear that the
Pakistan army entered Indian side and it lied about it.
It agreed to withdraw after international isolation, and
accepted so many bodies of army men. There are PoWs in
Indian jails.
Just one day after
Pakistan announced withdrawal, terrorists killed 25
people in India, but Pakistani newspapers reported it as
"Indian army killed 25 people in Kashmir".
Otherwise the fate of the editor would be the same as
that of Dr Maleeha Lodhi of The News, belonging to the
country's largest Jang group of publications. Or like
that of the editor of the Peshawar-based Frontier Post,
who is in police custody on charges of drug trafficking.
Or like outspoken journalist Najam Sethi, Editor of The
Friday Times, who was released after 25 days in custody
on June 3 after the government was forced to withdraw
sedition charges against him. But Sethi is now faced with
illegal tax notices against his establishment.
Now Pakistan is a
country with "Anti-Defection Bill by the Sharif
government, 1997" which prevents people from
speaking or voting against any government-sponsored
legislation. What a democracy! Mr Sharif has to get the
support of Mr Clinton and Mr Blair to ask "his"
army to withdraw for the fear that he might be overthrown
by the army, which has ruled the country for almost half
the period since Independence.
Pakistan's propaganda is
that India is not implementing the UN resolution. The
resolution clearly stated that Pakistan's army should
vacate occupied Kashmir first (PART II, A.1) and give the
administration to the local authorities under UN
surveillance (PART II A.3).
When the "UN
informs India of the above actions" only then should
India "begin" reducing its forces (PART III
B.1). Still it can "maintain minimum strength"
for law and order requirements. The resolution became out
of date after 24 years of Pakistani "inaction",
and it was superseded by the Simla Agreement of 1972. Now
Pakistan makes foul cry about it.
DILLIP K BEHERA
Bloomington (USA)
(Received in response to the Internet edition.)
*
* * *
Milk
rackets
Isn't it repugnant that
despite the fact that many spurious milk rackets were
unearthed in various parts of northern India over the
last year or so, merchants of death have remained free to
indulge in their satanic desire to build empires on
ill-begotten wealth ("Even milk kills now",
editorial, Aug 5). Surely, things have spilled beyond the
pail when these rascals have no qualms in killing
innocent children with spurious toxic milk.
Obviously, the
authorities do not act sternly enough and the punishment
also is neither swift nor probably sufficiently
discouraging. That is why these "milk sheikhs"
keep churning spurious toxic milk. In between, it was
with adulterated oil and even spurious life-saving drugs
that they sought their unsuspecting victims. The
law-abiding common man is very often at the receiving end
of all such acts of greed committed by unscrupulous
elements. And the sad thing is that the existing laws
either prove ineffective as deterrents or they are not at
all effectively implemented.
Unless the demons
involved in such heinous crimes are exorcised with
draconian punishment they will continue to kill innocent
people for their own gain. Shouldn't such heinous acts be
termed and treated as wilful, planned, cold-blooded
mass-murders, and accorded the punishment and contempt
they deserve? In fact, there should be public trial of
people who build their empires on death. They deserve
nothing less than death penalty for their sins against
innocent members of society. I am sure a handful of such
trials will deter the rest of the mean people from ever
contemplating such appalling atrocities.
VIVEK KHANNA
Panchkula
*
* * *
Relmajra
project
Dam helps increase
farm land (August 8) shows that your correspondent
has covered the Relmajra project extensively. Yet he has
missed out some important fact which I would like to add
as the officer in charge of the project.
The Punjab government
had to spend about Rs 6 lakh annually to tackle the
menace of soil erosion before the Relmajra project was
taken up. Earlier, rain in the area resulted in a heavy
accumulation of silt and sand on the national highway due
to extensive soil erosion. Sand is retained in the
catchment area itself now after the construction of the
dam, thereby saving government funds.
The groundwater recharge
in the area has also augmented. The pipeline mentioned in
the feature is an underground one and the water through
it flows due to gravity, thereby conserving energy as
well.
Another interesting
aspect that has been documented is the return of
wildlife. Earlier, denudation resulted in the flight of
fauna from the area. But after the dam bestowed the hills
with greenery, the animals and birds which had left the
barren hills have returned.
YOGENDRA
AGNIHOTRI
Chandigarh
*
* * *
|