A suggestion to the
President
INDIA is on the brink of
catastrophic uncertainty. All that we hear and see is
corruption, scams, power struggle and horse trading.
Politicians are changing party alignments like clothes,
just for the sake of ministership or other benefits, and
claiming that they are doing all this for the sake of the
country.
In the present
circumstances, inviting the largest group of parties to
form a government or holding another election is no
solution to the real problem because of the absence of
party loyalties. Even if one single group gets the
majority, it will not last very long. Happenings in
Gujarat and UP are an eye-opener for everybody. A
national government is possible, but only when the
peoples representatives have the welfare of the
country as their first priority.
The President should
invite all parties to offer their candidates for the post
of Prime Minister, if they can get the sponsorship of at
least one-third of the strength of the Lok Sabha. Then
members of the Lok Sabha should elect the Prime Minister
by a secret ballot under the preferential system of
voting (i.e. they can give a first preference to one
candidate, a second preference to another candidate and
so on). Whosoever is elected Prime Minister should
continue till the term of the present Lok Sabha lasts and
can be removed only by a two-third majority. To avoid
horse trading, they should be given only 48 hours to
decide, and if they dont cooperate, place the
country under Presidents rule and bring in the
presidential form of government.
I do not know whether
the Constitution allows all that I have written but one
thing is certain: the Constitution is meant for the
people and not that the people are meant for the
Constitution.
RAJINDER NATH
Ambala
*
* * *
Aspirants
for PMs post
In the present political
scenario the precedent set by President K.R. Narayanan
has opened the floodgates of aspirants for the Prime
Ministership (leaders of scores of political parties),
besides horse trading and corruption.
We have had over half a
dozen Prime Ministers in the recent past, and ours is
considered as one of the most corrupt countries in the
world.
May God give good sense
to our people to give the nation a stable government and
a place of honour in the comity of nations!
GANDHARV SAIN
New Delhi
*
* * *
Jhuggi-dwellers
This refers to the High
Court order on jhuggi-dwellers published in The Tribune
dated 19-4-1999. The jhuggi-dwellers have been occupying
prime land in elite urban estates of Panchkula, Gurgaon
and Faridabad. The court has ruled that these people will
not be evicted from the government land until they are
provided with alternative sites or houses built for the
economically weaker sections of society.
The verdict is fair and
in line with the concept of social justice that everybody
has the right to live honourably and for this one needs
food, clothes and a house. The state is bound to provide
these.
The jhuggi-dwellers of
Madrasi Colony in Sector 21 Panchkula are HUDAs own
employees. Their average monthly income ranges from Rs
4000 to Rs 7000 per family. They got the news of the High
Court order the same evening April 19 from
their counsel that the case had been decided in their
favour, and HUDA had lost the case. Hearing this, their
joy knew no bounds.
The residents whose
houses are very close to Madrasi Colony are in passive
mood and saying, God knows when we will get rid of
this slum. No time limit has been indicated in the
court order for the allotment of alternative sites or
houses.
The Bench consisted of
Mr Justice G.S. Singhvi and Mr Justice Shingal, who
delivered this judgement on a bunch of petitions by
jhuggi-dwellers of Gurgaon, Panchkula and Faridabad, and
directed the respondents to constitute a committee
preferably headed by the Chief Administrator, HUDA. The
committee, first of all, will determine the seniority of
the residents of jhuggi-jhompri colonies in the
respective urban estates and offer vacant EWS houses and
plots in order of seniority by determining the rates
keeping in view the policy already framed.
Those who cannot be
accommodated in EWS houses will be offered alternative
sites at distance of 7 to 10 km from their present place
of residence. They will be entitled to the allotment of
plots measuring one to two marlas and not more.
Those who accept the
offer of allotments should be given nine months
time to vacate the land in their possession. Those who do
not vacate the site after the expiry of nine months from
the date of offer of allotment will be liable to be
evicted without any further notice. Those who have been
living in huts for over five years will be entitled to
alternative plots or houses.
T. D. KUMAR
Panchkula
*
* * *
|