|
EU bans oil imports from Iran, imposes other curbs
Special to the tribune |
|
|
Special to the tribune
Memogate: Fearing arrest, Ijaz wants statement recorded in London
|
EU bans oil imports from Iran, imposes other curbs
Brussels/Tehran, Jan 23 In Iran, one politician responded by renewing a threat to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, an oil-exporting route vital to the global economy, and another said Tehran should cut off oil to the EU immediately. That might hurt Greece, Italy and other ailing economies that depend heavily on Iranian crude and, as a result, won as part of the EU agreement a grace period until July 1 before the embargo takes full effect. A day after a US aircraft carrier, accompanied by a flotilla that included French and British warships, made a symbolically loaded voyage into the Gulf in defiance of Iranian hostility, the widely expected EU sanctions move was likely to set off further bellicose rhetoric in an already tense region. Some analysts say Iran, which denies accusations that it seeking nuclear weapons, could be in a position to make them next year. So, with Israel warning it could use force to prevent that happening, the row over Tehran's plans is an increasingly pressing challenge for world leaders, not least U.S. President Barack Obama as he campaigns for re-election in November. Meeting in Brussels, foreign ministers from the 27-state EU, which as a bloc is Iran's second-biggest customer for crude after China, agreed to an immediate ban on all new contracts to import, purchase or transport Iranian crude oil and petroleum products. However, EU countries with existing contracts to buy oil and petroleum products can honour them up to July 1. EU officials said they also agreed to freeze the assets of Iran's central bank and ban trade in gold and other precious metals with the bank and state bodies. Along with US sanctions imposed on December 31, the Western powers hope choking exports and hence funding can force Iran's leaders to agree to curbs on a nuclear programme the West says is intended to yield weapons. — Reuters
|
||
Special to the tribune As question marks persist over the direction and intent of Iran’s nuclear programme, the Saudi authorities have signalled how a nuclear arms race could develop in West Asia. The Saudi prediction follows reports first published in the Israeli and US media that Riyadh is considering a secret nuclear pact with Pakistan to match Tehran’s military ambitions.
In London, there is speculation that Tehran could carry out a nuclear test as early as January 2013. It was Pakistan’s discredited scientist A.Q. Khan who first offered to share and sell nuclear weapons technology to Saudi Arabia and other neighbouring Muslim countries. His offer, picked up in 2003 by experts at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, was preceded by the claims of a defecting Saudi diplomat, Mohammad Abdalla al-Khilewi, who claimed he had hard evidence of Riyadh bankrolling Pakistan’s nuclear research. More recent reports that Saudi Arabia has given Pakistan a US $ three billion advance payment to purchase a small number of nuclear warheads in case Iran tests the bomb have been denied by Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former Saudi intelligence chief and ex-Saudi ambassador to the US and the UK. But Prince Turki has also cautioned that failure to stop Iran’s nuclear progress could push Gulf states to consider acquiring a nuclear deterrent. His warning is consistent with the assessment of former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Chas Freeman, who noted how Saudi officials had told him that “If and when Iran acknowledges having, or is discovered to have, actual nuclear warheads, Saudi Arabia would feel compelled to acquire a deterrent stockpile.” |
||
Special to the tribune
Washington, January 23 In a new report, the New York-based human rights group says high-profile assassinations, killings of journalists and attacks on civilians by the Taliban as well as sectarian and ethnic militant groups were commonplace. "The past year was disastrous for human rights in Pakistan," said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "Bombs killed hundreds of civilians, advocates of religious tolerance were assassinated and the military undermined democratic institutions. From Karachi to Quetta, Pakistan is teetering on the edge of becoming a military-run Potemkin democracy." "The military has gained increasing control of state institutions to the detriment of the rights of the Pakistani people," Adams added. President Asif Ali Zardari's government has a tempestuous relationship with the army as well as the judiciary. The Supreme Court has initiated contempt of court proceedings against Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani over his failure to reopen a corruption investigation against Zardari. And earlier this month, the army warned Gilani of "serious ramifications with potentially grievous consequences" after he criticised army chief Gen Ashfaq Kayani and the head of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Lt Gen Ahmed Shuja Pasha, in connection with what is called the Memogate scandal. Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's former ambassador in Washington, resigned in November 2011 after Mansoor Ijaz, a Pakistani-American businessman, accused him of being the architect of a memo urging US help to prevent a military coup in Pakistan. Haqqani, who has been living under virtual house arrest in Islamabad, fears for his life. Freedom of expression and belief were dealt serious blows by the assassinations of Punjab's governor Salmaan Taseer and the federal minorities' minister Shahbaz Bhatti over their support for amending the controversial and frequently misused blasphemy law. Taseer's bodyguard and self-confessed killer, Mumtaz Qadri, was convicted of murder, but the presiding judge fled the country amid fears for his safety.
|
||
Memogate: Fearing arrest, Ijaz wants statement recorded in London
January 23 Ijaz, however, offered to record statement in London, Zurich or any other place outside Pakistan before the Judicial Commission probing the scam, which had summoned Ijaz to record statement on Tuesday in Islamabad. He claims to have conveyed a memo dictated by former Pakistan ambassador Hussain Haqqani seeking US assistance to rein in Pakistan army. Sheikh said his client wants the army to provide him security because he does not trust interior minister Rehman Malik who has deputed a police officer to head the security team. He said Malik and several other officials of the ruling PPP have threatened to sue Ijaz on sedition and other charges and prevent him from leaving Pakistan. On Interior Minister Rehman Malik's assurances of arranging the army for Ijaz's security, Sheikh said, "I don't trust Rehman Malik. I trust Husain Haqqani more than I trust Rehman Malik… Did Benazir Bhutto not die in this country even after getting security assurances?" Haqqani's counsel, meanwhile, has moved the commission to rescind Ijaz's right to make any statement if he fails to appear on January 24. Malik, reacting to Ijaz's decision, said, "It is the drop scene of a fraudulent claim that had scandalised Pakistan." Mansoor Ijaz's counsel Akram Sheikh said his client is being trapped and may be arrested upon his arrival in Pakistan. Sheikh told reporters that Ijaz was reluctant to visit the country, fearing he would be detained indefinitely. He said Ijaz also believes that the police deputed by Malik would destroy the evidence he is bringing to Pakistan. "It seems like a well-orchestrated trap to hold Mr Ijaz indefinitely in Pakistan after his deposition before the commission," Sheikh said. Sheikh said he had also written to the army chief seeking help in provision of security, but has yet not received any reply. |
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | E-mail | |