|
Not the fault of the bridge Red label |
|
|
Jointly with EU Climate change worries both THE Joint Action Plan (JAP) for an “Indo-EU Strategic Partnership” adopted by India and the EU is wide-ranging, and has been described by the parties themselves as an “ambitious” document.
Hurricane Katrina
The legend of history
Taking governance to the doorsteps The thin veneer of civilization
|
Not the fault of the bridge BUILDING a Bailey bridge is not exactly rocket science. Rather, it is only a matter of basic engineering involving fixing of nuts and bolts to steel girders at angles. The Indian Army has vast expertise in such constructions going over several decades. That is why it appears beyond comprehension that the Kharo bridge in Kinnaur should simply collapse and claim the lives of some 42 Army men. No doubt, the terrain in that part of Himachal Pradesh is treacherous to the extreme but the Army has successfully undertaken far more complicated projects in far more inhospitable areas. It is imperative to hold a thorough probe into the tragedy and affix responsibility. If somebody has faulted, he or they deserve to be punished severely for this deadly goof-up. The lives of so many gallant soldiers will be lost in vain if right lessons are not learnt from this nightmarish collapse. The country would like to know if adequate safety measures were in place at the construction site. From preliminary reports it is obvious that only four of the jawans were wearing safety belts, which helped them in hanging on to life. Wasn’t it necessary for the others to be similarly harnessed? It is a harsh thing to say at this moment of tragedy but safety standards are grossly inadequate in the country. Life is considered woefully cheap and the same mistakes can be committed again. Unless the negligent wrong-doers are held responsible for their acts of commission and omission, things are not going to improve. Accidents do happen in high-risk jobs, but that does not mean that the workers should be left at the mercy of fate. What rankles the most about the Kharo tragedy is that it involved the Army which is normally more thorough in its approach than the civilians. The family members of the victims and also the rest of their countrymen should at least have the consolation of knowing that everything humanly possible was done to secure their lives while they were engaged in the task of bridging the mighty Sutlej. The bridge was to be opened after a few days. The tragedy has put a question mark on the safety of other such bridges in the area as well. |
Red label SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 was a red-letter day for the markets with the Sensex storming past the 8000-mark. September has special significance for bulls, and not just in the stock markets; this is the month of the famed annual bullfight in the southern Spanish town of Ronda. Nearer home, it has been an astonishing bull run in the stock market since the Left-backed UPA government came to office with Dr Manmohan Singh at the helm. Few may now wish to recall that the same Sensex crashed in May 2004, stricken by fears of what a Communist-backed coalition would mean for the economy. In the event, the market’s fears have proved to be unfounded. The Sensex has surged like never before — from that low of 4505 points to a record high of 8052 in less than 16 months. True, the Sensex is driven more by sentiment than sense; by signals rather than fundamentals. Yet, the fact that the role and influence of the Communist parties over the UPA has not been a dampener for the market, speaks volumes for Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s mission control. The turbo-charged bulls in our stock market have been on such a single-minded run since the UPA assumed office, that nothing, not even a succession of bad news — rising crude prices, the tsunami, Mumbai’s devastating deluge, the fire in ONGC’s offshore platform, the London bomb blasts and hurricane Katrina — could make them pause for breath. The momentum is driven solely by the adrenalin of liquidity, from Indian and foreign investors. It is hard to figure out whether our communists feel celebratory. However, it is an astounding paradox that the two countries attracting huge investible surpluses today are Communist China and India under a communist-influenced government. Capitalists might bemoan the contradiction, but are not averse to raking it in. Is it then time for the markets to raise a toast to the UPA, Dr Singh and the Indian Left, too? The “red” label may not be a bad idea to keep our bullish spirits high. |
Jointly with EU THE Joint Action Plan (JAP) for an “Indo-EU Strategic Partnership” adopted by India and the EU is wide-ranging, and has been described by the parties themselves as an “ambitious” document. It will be incumbent upon both partners to ensure that what they want is actually translated into action. Apart from the boosting of economic relations and scientific cooperation in areas of space and atomic energy, two key focus areas include countering terrorism and tackling climate change, and the measures outlined should prove mutually useful if it becomes part of a sustained effort. Much will depend on effective intelligence cooperation, preventing terrorist access to financing, and the disruption of international money laundering networks, apart from tackling terrorism on the ideological front. The envisaged cooperation between Europol on the EU side and the Central Bureau of Investigation on the Indian side must be practical and institutionalised. The idea of establishing a contact point in India for “Eurojust,” is intriguing. Eurojust is a network of judicial authorities across Europe, set up to fight against organised and cross-border crime. Some of the innovative elements in this framework may be found useful in a large and disparate country like India, but these need to be explained to the people. Cooperation on the climate change front has gotten off to a start with the release of the India-UK study on “Climate Change in India”. The study predicts a temperature rise of three to five degrees over the next 30 to 40 years, disrupting rainfall patterns and increasing the mean sea level. This is expected to reduce wheat and rice yields, apart from creating a dangerous pattern of floods and droughts, and epidemics. In this context, the idea of setting up an “India-EU Initiative on Clean Development and Climate Change” is an important step. The focus on facilitating alternative technologies and joint action on environment protocols is welcome. The planned India-EU environment forum can be the start of a coherent and workable approach to containing climate change and environmental degradation. |
We are all travellers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we can find in our travels is an honest friend. — R. L. Stevenson |
Hurricane Katrina LEGEND has it that President John F Kennedy told Dr Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan when the latter landed in a helicopter in pouring rain on the White House lawns that the United States, despite its many scientific achievements, had not yet mastered the art of controlling the weather. Dr Radhakrishnan’s reply was that India, on the other hand, had, several centuries ago, mastered the art of dealing with the weather. Katrina has shown that the only super power has not made much advance in either controlling or dealing with the weather. Not just New Orleans and its environs, but even the collective sense of invincibility of the superpower lay shattered in the wake of the cyclone, just as it did once before in another September. This time, the worst, rather than the best instincts of man came to the fore at the time of a national disaster. “Did you ever think you’d see the day when the US looked like a Third World country?” asked “South Florida Sun-Sentinel”. “The United States is not a Third World country. It must stop acting like one,” advised another Florida newspaper. American press seems to be unaware that the “Third World” ceased to exist with the collapse of the “Second World”. But if the reference is to a proverbial world of chaos, racism, anarchy, poverty, rape and murder, it is not a geographical monopoly. It can be in any continent where human depravity rears its ugly head when the cloak of civilised behaviour is lifted. Why insult other countries even if it is to highlight the depth to which a civilised nation has sunk at the time of a national disaster? The irony is that even commentators in Asia, Africa and Latin America are comparing the post-hurricane New Orleans to Third World country situations. A Third World mentality may well have survived the end of the Third World. The authorities, from the local Mayor to the President of the United States, are in the dock for inefficiency, lack of proper planning and sheer callousness. They had all the time in the world to anticipate the damage; the hurricane took long in coming and it was known that a hurricane in New Orleans would be as damaging as a bomb in New York or a major earthquake in San Francisco. The order of evacuation was flawed as the presumption was that everyone had the wherewithal to find his way out of danger. Those who either did not have the means to leave or were not willing to leave were asked to take refuge in the Superdome or the Convention Centre without a thought as to how they would survive without food and sanitation. Implicit in that action was a sense that those who did not have the means to leave did not deserve to live. The responsibility of the state to help the helpless was a hurricane casualty. The US press has been critical of the government and several questions have been asked. But the one obvious question that many seem not to ask is the cost per day of relief as compared to the cost of war in Iraq. Perhaps, this is because fight against terror is a holy cow and questioning it will be deemed unpatriotic or worse. If only the soldiers were deployed a few days earlier, much of the havoc that was caused to life and property by human hands, if not by the hurricane, could have been averted. The soldiers could have done greater service to the homeland at much less risk to themselves. No natural hazard is more dangerous than suicide bombers lurking in Baghdad streets. The advent of Homeland Security and its overarching role may well have diminished the importance of other relief agencies. Warnings of hurricanes do not raise the alert level in the United States as a scare about a terrorist attack does even if the havoc caused may be more severe. Nature’s fury and the energy released by it are often much more than any man-made explosion. Someone had attributed an earthquake in Maharashtra to the Pokhran explosion of 1974, but it was soon clarified that the power of the earthquake was many times more than the energy released when the Buddha smiled in the desert. A nation gripped with the fear of terrorism had ignored warnings of a natural disaster at its own peril. As Thomas Friedman wrote in the New York Times on September 7, 2005, “9/11 distorted our politics and society”. Of course, no one is sure that tsunamis and hurricanes are not man made. If climate change scenarios are to be believed, human consumption of the earth’s resources has depleted the earth so much that the globe has lost its natural immunity against such convulsions. The warnings sounded in 1972 in Stockholm went unheeded and it was too late and too little when the Rio declaration took note of the plunder and decided to do something to halt the damage and to reverse it. Even after Rio, the richest countries of the world are in no mood to change their consumption patterns to replenish the earth. They are making deals that save them the bother of having to find the incremental cost of environment friendly industrial growth. Katrina will not change the trend. There will be enough studies to show that global warming had nothing to do with the breaching of the levee in New Orleans. More resources of the earth will be used to strengthen the levee and to make the city even more gleaming than before. The phoenix that rises from its own ashes will dazzle us so much that the ashes will be forgotten soon enough. Someone said that New Orleans had already become old fashioned and that this should be seen as an opportunity to rebuild the city with new attractions. If thousands of lives had not been lost, it would have been a benign remark. Some island states in the South Pacific have been rebuilt with the insurance money after devastating hurricanes. The outpouring of grief and sympathy for the victims has been overshadowed by criticism of relief work. Several countries, including India, have made cash contributions and expressed readiness to help in other ways. Unlike India at the time of the tsunami disaster, the US has welcomed foreign assistance despite the vast resources at its command. Our high profile quest for permanent membership of the Security Council at that time may have been a factor in our decision not to accept foreign assistance for tsunami victims. A permanent member of long standing had no qualms in accepting foreign assistance. In fact, acceptance of assistance has blunted some of the criticism about mismanagement of relief. Do the gods kill us for their sport like wanton boys torture flies, as Shakespeare says, or is there a scheme in all this? Mother Earth is the embodiment of patience and she is supposedly capable of withstanding any onslaught. But when she chooses to strike back, the fury is beyond all measure. Katrina was undoubtedly one of the deadliest weapons in her
arsenal. |
The legend of history THE real Mangal Pandey cannot stand up because he is dead. What he means to us today depends on today. It also depends on who “us” are. The past has no independent existence. It exists because of the present. The neutral question What happened? cannot be decoupled from loaded questions such as What it meant? , What it led to? , And What it means. Thus our interpretation of the past depends upon our perception of the present. It is not possible to write history without implicating the historian. The power of history lies not in the assemblage of sterile truths but in the narrative. On the rare occasions when truth is stranger than fiction, the truth speaks for itself. But very often the truth is laborious. In that case it asks the legend to drive home the point. In the spectacular period film “Mughal-e-Azam”, Anarkali is not entombed alive, but exiled from the kingdom through a tunnel (It was not shown how she survived suffocation). When the film was released in August, 1961, the director, K. Asif, put up posters at least in Uttar Pradesh, saying that the Salim-Anarkali love story was not history but legend, and that one had a right to take liberties with a legend. K. Asif would have been in good company if he had taken liberties with the history itself. History has always been called upon to lend legitimacy and support to contemporary ideologies and actions. If there have been uncomfortable facts in the way, they have often been sacrificed at the altar of expediency. The wild horses so famously tamed by the American cowboys were not wild, but feral, that is offspring of released domesticated horses brought from Spain. Selective suppression of facts was developed into a fine art by the English during the colonial period. The British told the upper-caste Hindus that they like the new rulers were Indo-Europeans while the Muslims were Semites. Except that Saladin (correctly Salah-ud-din), well-known as the 12th century Muslim general who fought against the Christian Crusaders, was not a Semite. He was a Kurd and thus an Indo-European himself. The English like everybody else create myths when they are needed (Lawrence of Arabia; Churchill). But it goes to their credit that they deconstruct them when the need is over. We also create myths but unfortunately we insist on perpetuating them at great cost even when they have become irrelevant. It would, of course, be interesting to know what the historical facts on Mangal Pandey are and how the movie departs from them. But it will perhaps be far more interesting to ascertain who needs the legend and
why. |
The thin veneer of civilization THE big lesson of Katrina is not about the incompetence of the Bush administration, the scandalous neglect of poor black people in the United States or our unpreparedness for major natural disasters, though all of those apply. Katrina’s big lesson is that the crust of civilization on which we tread is always wafer thin. One tremor and you’ve fallen through, scratching and gouging for your life like a wild dog. Remove the elementary staples of organized, civilized life — food, shelter, drinkable water, minimal personal security — and we go back within hours to a Hobbesian state of nature, a war of all against all. Some people, some of the time, behave with heroic solidarity; most people, most of the time, engage in a ruthless fight for individual and genetic survival. A few become temporary angels; most revert to being apes. The word “civilization,” in one of its earliest senses, referred to the process of human animals being civilized — by which we mean, I suppose, achieving a mutual recognition of human dignity, or at least accepting in principle the desirability of such a recognition. Reading Jack London the other day, I came across an unusual word: decivilization. That is the opposite process — the one by which people cease to be civilized and become barbaric. There are intimations of this even in normal, everyday life. Road rage is a good example. Or think what it’s like waiting for a late-night flight that is delayed or canceled. Obviously, the decivilization in New Orleans was 1,000 times worse. I can’t avoid the feeling that there will be more of this, much more of it, as we go deeper into the 21st century. There are just too many big problems looming that could push humanity back. The most obvious threat is more natural disasters as a result of climate change. If this cataclysm is interpreted by politicians as a “wake-up call” to alert Americans to the consequences of the United States continuing to pump out carbon dioxide as if there were no tomorrow, then the Katrina hurricane cloud will have a silver lining. But it may already be too late. We may be launched on an unstoppable downward spiral. If so, if large parts of the world were tormented by unpredictable storms, flooding and temperature changes, then what happened in New Orleans would seem like a tea party. Almost having the force of a flood is the pressure of mass migration from the poor and overpopulated South of the planet to the rich North. If natural or political disasters were to put still more millions on the move, our immigration controls might one day prove to be like the levees of New Orleans. Even with current levels of immigration, the resulting encounters are proving to be explosive. How civilized will we remain? And then there is the challenge of accommodating the emerging great powers, especially India and China, into the international system. Especially in the case of China, where communist leaders use diversionary nationalism to stay in power, there is a danger of war. Nothing decivilizes more quickly and surely than war. So never mind Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations.” That, as the old Russian saying goes, was long ago and not true anyway. What’s under threat here is simply civilization, the thin crust we lay across the seething magma of nature, including human nature. (Garton Ash is a professor of European Studies at Oxford)
— LA Times-Washington Post |
From the pages of Religion and bitterness
Why does religion become the root of bitterness? Why does it engender so much strife and disunion? How is it that a force that ought to promote peace and goodwill among men gets so perverted as to paralyse for centuries the best energies of nations? The evil lies, not in religion, but in the professors and promoters of it, who seek to turn it into an engine of their own selfish and sordid ambitions. There are always men who love to fish in troubled and turbid waters, and they soon find that religious speculation is the best means for ruffling the peace of the nations. But the folly of religious, propagandists does not lie in trying to disseminate what they honestly or dishonestly believe to be right. The folly lies in believing that theirs is the only panacea for human ills and every one who holds a different view must be wrong and ought to be spoken against. Religious diversity will long remain as the most patent fact about the people of India.
|
Forsake not words; forsake only words of envy and greed. Religions in the heart not in the knees. |
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |