Ludhiana, December 3
After an enquiry the authorities at the local Government College for Boys have described the allegations of ‘sexual harassment’ by a college lecturer “as mishandling of a classroom situation” wherein unidentified persons, possibly students, drew caricatures on the blackboard, hurting the sensitivity of the said lady lecturer.
The college Principal, Mr V.P. Gaur, said that the incident pertains to around mid November when some obscene caricatures were reportedly drawn on class board. Taking a serious note, the concerned college lecturer shunted out 16 boys from B.A (I) class for an extended period of time.
This resulted in unsavoury conditions leading to great resentment on part of students who wanted to go on strike. Prof. P.S Sohi, seeing the assembled students asked them what the matter was. The students said that the said lecturer, Ms Anurag Gill, had kept them out of the classroom for a number of days on end and they wanted to go on strike against this injustice. Prof. Sohi advised them to go to the Principal and have the matter sorted out.
The Principal, Mr V.P. Gaur, asked the students whether they could identify the miscreant but the students pleaded ignorance. None the less, Mr Gaur asked the students to apologise. The students wrote an apology letter and promised to find the defaulter. Soon after Ms Gill came to the Principal and reported the drawing of obscene caricatures with her name on the class board and lecture stand. The Principal marked the complaint to convener, discipline committee, Prof D.S. Gill. She, however never went to him.
On the other hand, Ms Anurag Gill says that the caricature drawn the board was extremely obscene and she asked the students to bring their parents to see their work. Since she has been teaching B.A. I Sec-F (Compulsory English) for last one year; she identified 16 boys and asked them to meet her only after bringing their parents.
She said, “I went with a complaint to the principal on November 20 but he returned it without putting any number on the letter and it had the impression that he wanted to hush up the matter and did not want to take it seriously.”
“Next day, Prof Sohi along with those students complained against me for turning the students out, to the Principal. I was summoned to Principal’s office where four members of faculty were present. I was questioned as if I was the culprit and never even asked to sit down. The Principal asked me to ignore such problems and said that they could not take a chance of a strike in the college. I was flabbergasted at such an attitude of indifference. On November 25, a new committee on Vishakha Guidelines was formed but at the same time a fake strike was organised and slogans were shouted against me.”
Ms Gill, however wanted a committee based on guidelines of the Supreme Court, Vishakha versus State of Rajasthan, to look into the matter. The Principal says, he immediately referred the case to such a committee headed by Mrs Sukhbir Kaur Bhatia and other four senior most lady teachers of the college. After going into details of the complaint and holding several meetings with the said English lecturer and the students concerned, the students who had been accused of drawing the caricature apologised to the lecturer in writing, despite the fact that the guilty could not be identified.
This was done purely to assuage her feelings. The matter, he said, had been satisfactorily sorted out to the satisfaction of the lecturer and her mother and she gave it in writing that she was satisfied with the decision of the enquiry committee. The sections of the students were also reshuffled as desired by the lecturer.
She says that she felt since she was a teacher on ad hoc basic, she had no sympathy from anyone and was in vulnerable position. In the Vishakha committee, one of the members, asked her angrily how could she use the word ‘sexual harassment’ again and again while all her life she had never use this word.
Her mother, who is a lecturer in Government College, Karamsar, spoke about this matter to DPI, Ms Nisha Sharad, but she said that it is a local issue and the Principal appoints all the ad-hoc teachers. So he is only entitled to settle the case.