Wednesday,
September 11, 2002, Chandigarh, India
|
|
|
THE ACHIEVERS New Delhi, September 10 Keeping this in mind, this Laxmi Nagar-based dreamer, Amit Sharma, launched a social service organisation called Sarve Siksha Samiti, that year. Under the aegis of this organisation he set up a computer institute, Bhardwaj Institute of Technology. The institute is accredited to DOEACC `O’ level courses and is being run on a no-profit, no-loss basis. Right now, 100 odd students from the weaker sections are enrolled in different courses. Amit said the objective was to provide quality computer education to those having the right aptitude but not being able to afford the high fees being charged by the other computer institutes. He said, “We take students after a screening. There is no room for a student of a well-to-do family here. Leave the neighbours, even my family treat me as a mad person as I have spent lakhs of rupees on this project without getting anything in return,” said Amit. “But I am saying very candidly that I am satisfied with this venture and it is enough for me, though such a thought is rare in this materialistic world,” he claims. In this project the only member from his family is his younger sister, Pragati. She is lending him a helping hand. Amit says that information technology will play a major role in the coming days and so every person should be armed with knowledge in this field. He is also toying with the idea of imparting free basic computer education in slum-based primary schools. For this, he has recently launched another social service organisation, Good Heaven Education and Social Welfare Society. |
|
CAMPUS SCENE New Delhi, September 10 The DUTA's stand on the issue is that the government is merely trying to curtail expenditure and that the government plans to invite private participation in the education sector will render it inaccessible for a large quantum of deserving students. It has appealed to the students to participate in the agitation since it will prove to be beneficial for their community in the long run. Apart from the UGC plans of hiking fees for higher education and the inception of self-financing courses, its directives have come in for widespread criticism from the student community. R. Rajesh, a student of Hindu College, said, “The increase in fees will not hit Delhi students but will make it impossible for underprivileged students to avail of quality higher education, which will have an adverse impact on the youths.” “The inception of self-financing vocational courses seems to be a positive step but it should not come at the cost of basic courses that form a fundamental part of higher education,” said Sanjay Bohidar, treasurer, DUTA, at a press conference on Monday. The other directive of the UGC seeks to increase the number of working hours for teachers from a maximum of 15 per week to a minimum of 20 per week, implying a reduction in teaching staff. In a closer inspection of the guidelines, it seems that the UGC proposal presents a non-feasible scenario. Consider this; 16 minimum hours of lectures imply 19 classes per lecturer in a week. The Academic Council stipulates the conduction of one tutorial/practical for every four lectures, which means five tutorials/practicals per lecturer in a week. This implies that each lecturer is required to take at least 24 classes in a week. Further, a 100 marks paper requires six lectures a week, which means each lecturer will have to teach at least three 100 marks papers or six 50 marks papers, to earn his/her livelihood. While fixing the workload, little or no attention seems to have been paid to the student-teacher interaction. The ratio of student-teacher ratio -- in case the UGC directive is implemented -- would swell to 300 students per teacher, or in some cases, to about 600 students per teacher (since a paper normally comprises of 100 students and each teacher will be required to take three to six papers). This would increase the dependence of students on a particular teacher and the absence of a teacher will affect the classes of multiple papers. The requirement for each teacher to take five-six classes a day will adversely affect the quality of classes and will leave the teacher with no time to prepare for classes. The increase in student-teacher ratio and the reduction in the proportion of tutorials will considerably reduce the personal interaction between the students and teachers. Also, the time devoted by teachers for evaluation purposes will drastically reduce, rendering the students unable to get quality feedback on class work. Prof Shaswati Mazumdar, president, DUTA. said, “The students will be the real losers in the long run in case the UGC directives are implemented.” But, the Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) has refrained from rendering support to the DUTA in its agitation, for “it is not in the best interest of the student community.” The DUTA has resolved to compensate for the time lost by students due to the strike, through extra classes. The DUTA is willing to ensure that “student interest is upheld under any circumstances". But, this assurance seems to be, too little too late, as the widespread opinion is that none of the parties involved (UGC or DUTA) are actually concerned about students' welfare and are merely invoking support to win this tug of war. Meanwhile, DUSU has been relegated to the status of a spectator, as the custodian of student interest seems to be watching from the sidelines. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |