Thursday, January 24, 2002,
Chandigarh, India
|
|
|
Teachers go for protest march Ludhiana, January 23 The teachers have been blaming the government for reduction in grant-in-aid to non-government colleges. They have also blamed the government for misappropriation of Rs 21 crore received from the HRD Ministry for the payment of arrears to the staff of non-government colleges. Meanwhile, Prof K.B.S. Sodhi, president of the union, had earlier declared that more protest rallies would be organised till the notification regarding pension gratuity scheme would be released. He also said that the teachers would have to intensify their struggle which might include a flag march in the constituency of Mr Parkash Singh Badal, Chief Minister, Punjab. |
|
Cultural festival opens at college Ludhiana, January 23 The auditorium was resonant with the music and choreography presentations by the students. The individual and group song items regaled the audience followed by girls walking down the ramp in impressively choreographed sequences. The day’s contests came to an end with poster-making and painting competitions which saw participation in overwhelming numbers. Students lent colours to the occasion and beautifully depicted the themes like “55 years of Indian Independence” and “College campus” and exhibited their talent through paints and brushes. Dr A.S. Bansal, director, appreciated the interest of the students and said that contests for individual dances, skit, dumb charades, mock press conference, cartooning and rangoli would be held tomorrow. |
Refund amount, PSEB told Ludhiana, January 23 According to the complaint, the consumer received a bill of Rs 13,601, including Rs 11,600 on account of sundry charges, on October 25, 2000. The consumer stated that when he approached PSEB officials concerned for the clarification of the amount, he was told that the demand had been raised on the basis of a report of M.E. Laboratory. The consumer disclosed that the meter was not checked in his presence and he was not issued any notice to be present at the time of checking, which was mandatory. It was alleged that the demand had not been raised as per rules and liable to be quashed. The board pleaded that the meter installed on the premises of complainant was changed on November 10, 1999, and the meter change order (MCO) was signed by Mr Varinder Kumar, the representative of the complainant. It was disclosed that at the time of changing the meter, the glass was found loose and it was reported in the MCO. The removed meter was sent to the laboratory on 18 January, 2000, after sealing it properly. The complainant was intimated about the checking of the meter, orally as well as in writing, but neither he nor his representative visited the laboratory. As such the meter was checked in the absence of the consumer and the checking revealed that the glass of the meter was tempered with. Moreover, a few pieces of broken glass was found inside the meter. The forum observed that the demand had been raised against the rules and liable to be quashed. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |