Saturday,
July 28, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
Compucom offers computer
education Chandigarh, July 27 The company has offered computer education at these schools on the same terms and conditions on which it had entered into an agreement with the UT Education Department on July 9. The company would be conducting school-level computer courses at the rate of Rs 72 per student per month in government high schools and senior secondary schools of the city . It may be recalled that Compucom Software Limited is all set to launch the project for imparting computer education to the students of government schools by the end of August. About 13,000 students have already opted for the computer education courses in government schools. The response was tremendous from students and parents when options were obtained by school authorities. There are seven government- aided privately managed schools functioning in the city . Besides this there are approximately 80 privately-managed recognised schools in the city . Some of the recognised schools are already imparting computer education to students. The general manager, Compucom Software Limited, has requested the Director Public Instructions (Schools) to apprise principals of privately-managed recognised schools and government-aided schools of this offer for the benefit of the students of their school. When contacted the general manager , Compucom, Mr G.K. Garg, said this programme would bring about an IT revolution in the education field. “We are all set to impart computer education in government schools and expect the same response from private schools,” he said. |
MCA counselling on August 1 Chandigarh, July 27 Interviews will be held only for the NRI and NRI-sponsored category in the afternoon session. Candidates are required to bring along original certificates , NRI certificates and an affidavit from a Class I Magistrate ( if required). The students are required to submit a demand draft for $ 4000 in favour of the Registrar, PU, along with other regular fees which are paid in cash on the spot, the press note added. |
Exam results Chandigarh, July 27 The result gazette can be seen at the Panjab University inquiry counter or on telephone numbers: 784869/534818 on all working days from 9 am to 1.30 pm and from 2pm to 5pm. |
PU extends date Chandigarh, July 27 |
NOC for engineering institute Chandigarh, July 27 A press note issued by the academy claimed that the college had been allowed 60 seats each for B.Tech in computer science, information technology, electronics and communication and electrical engineering for 2001-2002 by the All-India Council of Technical Education. The college is affiliated to Kurukshetra University. |
HIGH COURT Chandigarh, July 27 The court, while allowing a bunch of petitions filed by Dayanand Medical College at Ludhiana and some other students, had quashed the earlier admissions. The petitioners had challenged the action of the university and state of Punjab vide in lowering the qualifying marks from 50 per cent and in providing reservation to certain categories. This, the petitioners’ counsel contended, was in violation of regulations issued by the Medical Council of India.
MDU plea against lab man dismissed
The High Court has held that it cannot reappreciate evidence given before the Labour Court in the same manner as done by the Court of Appeals. Pronouncing the orders Mr Justice S.S. Nijjar held: “The court would be justified in interfering with the findings of the facts recorded by the Labour Court only if the award suffered from an error apparent on the face of the record”. Giving details, Mr Justice Nijjar further held: “The award would suffer from an error apparent on the face of the record only if the findings were either based on no evidence or were perverse”. Dismissing the petition filed by Maharshi Dayanand University against a lab assistant, Mr Justice Nijjar observed: “The Labour Court has found that the inquiry conducted by the management was not fair and proper. The management has been given full opportunity to justify its action. The writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is dismissed”. Experts to decide schools’ acceptance
The High Court ruled that the process of granting, or declining, accreditation to schools was the function of expert bodies and the “court would certainly accept the findings as correct unless the case was of exceptional circumstances”. Giving a ruling, Mr Justice Swatanter Kumar observed: “If a case of a strong mala fides, bias and orders being palpably erroneous or based on no facts was pleaded and established on the record by specific averments and documents, the court may examine such a case”. Mr Justice Kumar also dismissed the petition filed by Prerna Public School at Sirsa. In their petition against National Open School at Delhi, the school had earlier stated that the provisional accreditation granted to them was not extended. Pension scheme for lecturers
In a submission before the High Court, counsel for the state of Punjab today stated that a scheme for the grant of pension and other retirement benefits to the lecturers in affiliated colleges would be finalised within three months. After recording his statement, a Division Bench, comprising Mr Justice S.S. Nijjar and Mr Justice J.S. Khehar, fixed November 1 as the next date of hearing in the case. Taking up the case, the Bench observed: “It is not disputed that the Punjab Government had given its consent to the amended Act (Punjab Affiliated Colleges Seniority of Service of Employees Act) on April 19, 1999. The Act has been published in government gazette on April 26, 1999. Even then, the scheme has not been finalised till date”. The Bench further added: “A large number of employees are unnecessarily suffering due to the inaction on the part of the respondents. After examination of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that a direction ought to be issued to the government to implement the scheme within a fixed period”. In their petition, Jagdish Chander of Hoshiarpur and eight other lecturers had earlier asked for directions to the state of Punjab and others to release pension and other benefits in accordance with the scheme. AG told to resolve PPSC feud
The High Court has desired that the Punjab Advocate-General Mr H.S. Mattewal, should call the members and the Chairman of the Punjab Public Service Commission and ensure that internal dispute in the commission is settled before the next hearing in the case on July 30. Members of the commission had filed a writ petition in the High Court against the Chairman. The writ came up for hearing on July 18. As a sequel to this direction, the Advocate-General has requested the Chairman, Mr Ravinder Pal Singh Sidhu, and members — Mrs Harjit Kaur Randhawa, Mr R.C. Gupta and Mr Amarjit Singh Chawla — to attend a meeting on July 30 at 9.30 a.m. before the Court hearing. |
Beant case: HC direction to UT Administration Chandigarh, July 27 Pronouncing the directions in the open court, Mr Justice G.S. Singhvi and Mr Justice Mehtab Singh Gill of the high court also fixed November 13 as the next date of hearing on the petition filed by Sector 7 painter Surinder Sharma. His statement had reportedly led to the arrest of the accused in the case. Earlier during the proceedings, Special Counsel for the premier investigating agency, Mr R.K. Handa, informed the court that out of 426 prosecution witnesses in the assassination case, 129 had been examined. A day-to-day progress report in the case was also submitted by the Special Counsel. He added that there was no delay on the part of the investigating agency. The Inspector-General of the Chandigarh Police, Mr B.S. Bassi, personally present on high court directions, told the Judges that the CBI was investigating and prosecuting the case. According to the prosecution, Sharma had painted a grey Ambassador car, allegedly purchased from New Delhi by an accused in the case, for the commission of the offence. The car, as per the prosecution story, was recovered from the spot soon after the explosion in which the former CM was killed. The vehicle had later led to the identification of the accused and their subsequent arrest. Sharma, in his petition, had alleged that the award, promised to the person providing information in the case, had not been handed over to him. The former CM, it may be recalled, was killed in an explosion on August 31, 1995. While the believed-to-be human bomb died in the blast, the other accused in the case are facing trial. According to sources, more than 130 prosecution witnesses have been examined by the CBI. Hijacking case Mr Justice K.S. Garewal of the high court on Friday issued notice for July 31 on a petition filed by three accused in the Kandahar hijacking case seeking stay on proceedings before the trial court. In their petition, Abdul Latif and two others had earlier stated that the trial court had declined their prayer for direction to the prosecution for the supply of legible copies of the documents. Giving details, they had added that the pilot — Captain Devi Sharma — and flight engineer, Anil Kumar, were to be cross-examined and as such legible record was required. They had added that permission was granted to defence counsel for inspecting the aeroplane before August 1 but they were not permitted the “service of a photographer”. Their counsel had further added that the trial would not be fair if the proceedings were not stayed during the pendency of their revision petition. Demolition stayed Issuing notice of motion for December 13 to the Chandigarh Administration and other respondents on a petition filed by the Chandigarh Golf Club, a Division Bench of the high court on Friday stayed the demolition of a squash court. In their petition taken up by the Bench, comprising Mr Justice N.K. Sodhi and Mr Justice Jasbir Singh, the club had earlier challenged the notice issued by the Assistant Estate Officer ordering the demolition of the court on the allegations of illegal construction. Jerath case Disposing of a petition filed by Chandigarh’s former Chief Engineer, Kanwal Kishore Jerath, seeking the setting aside of orders passed by the UT Chief Judicial Magistrate granting pardon to accused-turned-approver Jagdish Mitter in the engineering department kickback case, Mr Justice K.S. Garewal of the high court on Friday directed him to approach the Special Judge. In his petition, Jerath had earlier stated that Mitter was “lured by the then Chief Vigilance Officer-cum-Secretary personal of the Chandigarh Administration who was instrumental in reinstating him on the post of Superintending Engineer with full powers after he turned approver”. He further stated that “there were 42 entries against his name in the diary of the liaison agents for having received kickbacks to the tune of Rs 3,20,000”. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |