Sunday,
July 15, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
|
PAU
students excel in ICAR-JRF exam Ludhiana, July 14 Six agricultural stream students — Bikramjit, Ramandeep, Gurpreet, Raman Bansal, Kulwinder and Arun Samyal — have been selected for the national-level fellowships of Rs 3600 per month each and a research grant of Rs 6000 per annum for a period of two years for their masters degree in the field. According to Dr M.S. Tiwana, Dean, College of Agriculture, 60 students had appeared in the examination, out of which 25 qualified the test. The students who qualified belonged to different streams in agriculture i.e. seven in Soil Science, eight in Entomology, two in Plant Breeding, three in Extension Education and five in Agricultural Economics. |
Consumer forum quashes PSEB demand Ludhiana, July 14 According to the complaint, the PSEB issued a letter on August 4, 2000, to the consumer demanding Rs 32,027 and disconnected the connection on October 30, 2000. It was alleged in the letter that the consumer had been stealing power as the ME seals of the meter were tempered with and it was recording low consumption of power. The complainant alleged that he was being unnecessarily harassed. He said he was not served a notice by the PSEB to be present at the time of checking of the meter at the ME laboratory, which was mandatory. He stated that the demand had not been raised as per the rules of the PSEB and was liable to be quashed. The PSEB pleaded that the board officials had checked the electricity meter of the complainant during the door-to-door checking on September 1, 2000, by the meter inspector. The board stated that at the time of checking it was found that two seals had been tempered with. The respondent stated that the testing of the meter at the site, with standard heat load and stop-watch method, indicated that it was recording low consumption of energy by 60 per cent. The meter was removed and sent to the laboratory after proper packing and sealing on September 4, 2000, for a computerised checking. It was alleged by the PSEB that it was a clear case of measured theft of power by the consumer as the laboratory report revealed that the meter was recording low consumption by 66.13 per cent. The PSEB claimed that the demand was justified and the compliant was liable to be dismissed. The forum observed that there was no evidence placed before the forum to prove that the consumer was issued a notice for his presence at the time of checking of the meter, which was mandatory. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |