Tuesday,
May 15, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
Rs 50 cr for repair, construction
of school buildings Fatehgarh Sahib, May 14 Expressing concern over the deplorable condition of the government schools, he said whenever he had visited or checked any school in the state the school headmasters, principals and even class teachers have failed to give satisfactory reply regarding their students. Citing an example he said during his visit to Government Dyalpur Sodian secondary school in Patiala district, the principal failed to tell how many students were in matric, Class XI and even in Class VIII. There were only three students in Science group in that school while five lecturers were posted their. He said the department has taken various steps to improve the standard of the education in schools and keeping this in mind the transfer policy of the teachers has been formed. He said in future only those teachers would be posted on the station of their choice whose performance would be more than 50 per cent in maths and science subjects and 65 per cent in languages and for the transfer of the head of the school the school results should be 60 per cent. He said the department have received 15,000 applications for the transfers upto April 30. He said only those teachers would be promoted, whose last five years record would be positive. He said the government will spend Rs 50 crore on the repair and
construction of school buildings this year as compared to Rs 30 crore spent last year. He also announced a grant of Rs 2 lakh to the school. |
PSEB demand
rejected Ludhiana, May 14 The forum directed the PSEB to restore the connection of the complainant within a week of recovering the due amount, excluding the disputed sum. The forum also directed the board not to slap reconnection charges or some other charges on the complainant. The board had removed the electricity meter from the complainant’s house and replaced it with a new one, in his absence without prior notice. Mr Gurdip alleged that the board had not disclosed any reason for removing the meter. After that, he received a bill for Rs 66,461 on October 28, 2000, that did not include the details of charges. The consumer alleged that the bill was illegal as the basis of issuing it had not been disclosed. He sought that the demand be quashed and the board be directed to pay a compensation. The board said the meter had been inspected on basis of an information regarding power theft in the area, on September 5, 2000. It said the ME seals had been tampered with. During the testing of the meter by standard heater-load-and-stop-watch method, it was showing a 75 per cent less consumption of energy. The board said, to obtain specific proofs of power theft, the meter had been replaced with new a one. The old one was sent to ME Laboratory. The laboratory tests proved that the current coil had been reduced and the meter was recording less consumption of energy. The board said, as the theft of energy had been proved, Rs 63,755 was added to the bill. The forum said the documents produced in the court showed that the tests reports and the laboratory reports had not been signed by the complainant or his representative. The consumer did not receive any notice to be present at the time of checking. The forum said the PSEB had violated the rules, for which, its demand should be quashed. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |