Wednesday, February
7, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
Stability and responsibility IN
his message to the nation on the eve of Republic Day, the President while commenting on the Prime Minister’s suggestion to give a fixed term to the Lok Sabha, emphasised that the fathers of the Constitution had stressed the importance of responsibility over stability and uniformity. Should it be taken that responsibility has no relevance to stability? It has become clear that stable governments with able leaders are more responsible than unstable coalition governments. In a democracy, the importance of the people’s verdict cannot be denied. At the same time, the nation cannot afford frequent elections. Unstable political conditions have hampered the growth of trade and industry. Disruptive, separatist and terrorist forces have become active and criminal elements and the underworld have struck deep roots due to the ineffectiveness of unstable and weak governments at the Centre. The states are demanding greater autonomy, thus sowing the seeds of a loose confederation. With the recent trend of hung Parliament and coalition governments at the Centre, regional groups governing the states are visualising a different non-federal political system in India. This will give rise to a loose confederation and not a tightly knit union.
|
|
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |