Saturday,
October 14, 2000, Chandigarh, India
|
A serious threat to wildlife THIS refers to the news item “Poacher kills tiger in zoo” (The Tribune, October 7). This time Wildlife Week will record many firsts in the world. During this week, the unfeeling poacher killed, dragged out of the cage, slit the head, peeled off the skin, removed the nail and threw into the pond the carcass of the 13-month-old tiger on the night of October 4. Strangely this gory killing was masterminded and executed in a zoo where round-the-clock vigil is to be taken for granted to safeguard the prestigious wild animals. Had there been a video tape of the gruesome killing, no feeling person could bear it. History will condemn poachers and those aiding and abetting killings as humans devoid of compassion, sanity and vision. The worst casualties in the history of zoo the world over within 36 hours (from July 5) is a record of its own nature which is perhaps fit to find a place in the Guinness Book of Records. One can conclude from the deaths of wild animals during these days that the zoos in India are not safe and fit place for them. One laments at the uncongenial conditions in the zoos. The animals in captivity need extra care in heeding, feeding, breeding and treatment. It is strange that those who have not been taught about wild animals, in veterinary colleges, are required to treat them well. Their expertise is through experience and not education. Vets who have attained super speciality through research and advance education should only be allowed to give medical treatment to zoo animals. SOSHIL RATTAN
|
|
Problem of plenty The editorial dated October 7, “Paddy is not for
burning”, rightly points out the failure of the government to deal with the bumper crop and overflowing stocks. What for is the “support price” when the government agencies refuse to accept paddy on a pretext which is clearly “an afterthought” and flimsy. This problem is not going to end with this year only but will be repeated year after year until some alternative is offered to paddy sowing. It calls for a long-term policy on two fronts. Dealing with the excess stock on the one hand and providing an alternative to farmers to paddy sowing on the other. The Food For Work programme of the midday meal scheme may be initiated again to “dip into the stocks to fight poverty”. An alternative to paddy sowing can only be provided by the agriculture universities of the
state. DARSHAN KUMAR |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 120 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |