|
Family and emotions
THIS refers to Ms Kiran Bedis
Counter-violence at home (March 10). It is
rather surprising that Ms Bedi, who championed the cause
of Indian culture by persuading the inmates of Tihar Jail
to practice meditation and yoga, should advocate the
policing of domestic atmosphere of a common
Indian family.Whatever be the experience of the
government of Mauritius regarding the Protection from
Domestic Violence Act, 1997, we in India have our own
particular socio-cultural set-up. That a practice is
successful in a particular country does not ensure its
automatic acceptability in our country.Ms Bedi needs to
differentiate between domestic violence and an effective
retributive and reformatory act of the head of a family.
Domestic violence should not be equated with crimes like
robbery, murder or assault. Sometimes the seeming
harassment, maltreatment and assault or intimidation may
be termed as domestic violence, while the real aim of
such a treatment may be corrective and in the larger
interest of society and the nation. An adolescent
developing anti-social tendencies cannot straight away be
handed over to the police. Some internal social check,
even the so-called domestic violence, has to be
applied.The differences within a family are the result of
dynamic interaction among the members and need to be
resolved there itself. The need of the law and the police
arises only when a law is explicitly violated or social
peace endangered. Family life is based on emotions. Let
us not convert it into a legal contract.Ms Bedis
article reminds me of a small but significant incident.
An NRI returned home after many years abroad. The moment
he came out of Delhi airport, he slapped his 10-year-old
son and said, Now go and call the police for my
infringement of our human rights. Perhaps Ms Bedi
realises that the institution of family is founded on
emotions, mutual trust and cooperation and not on legal
rights.
VED GULIANI
Hisar
* *
* *
Helping
the farmers
In the editorial
Grow and suffer (The Tribune, March 5) the
plight of farmers has been rightly analysed, which in my
view is due to the indifferent attitude of the
governments at the Centre and in the states. A few months
back, tonnes of paddy was damaged in the mandis in Punjab
due to unseasonal rain, resulting in huge losses to the
farmers. News of distress sales of their produce and
destruction of crops in the fields due to low prices and
subsequent losses suffered by the farmers make one sad.
The farmer, who is the backbone of the countrys
economy, deserves all guidance and help. I have the
following suggestions to make in this regard:
1. In all the states, the
areas which grow a particular variety of vegetables or
crops in abundance should be identified, and the farmers
should be encouraged to grow those varieties by providing
them the necessary help and guidance, and a justified
minimum support price for their produce.
2. The produce of the
farmers should be procured by an integrated agency
created for this specific purpose, eliminating the system
of middlemen. This agency should also be entrusted with
the task of further marketing of the agricultural produce
procured by it. This step will ensure reasonable returns
to the farmers, saving them from the harassment at the
hands of middlemen and traders. The consumer, too, would
get vegetables and foodgrains at reasonable rates. The
existing agencies like the FCI can be reinforced for this
purpose. They should be made fully accountable for any
lapse in this regard.
3. Adequate storage
facilities should be created in the various zones,
keeping in view the quantum of production, thus saving
the foodgrains from damage. For this purpose, cooperative
societies of farmers should be encouraged and the
necessary financial and technical assistance be provided
to them. These societies should also be encouraged to set
up small-scale processing units for vegetables, etc, and
the necessary marketing avenues be provided to them.
CHANDRA SHEKHAR
NAG
Shahpur (Kangra)
* *
* *
Mixed
bag of IT proposals
The proposals to amend the
Income Tax Act, 1961, through the Finance Bill, 1999,
constitute a mixed bag. The Finance Minister deserves
kudos for exempting the entire income in respect of units
received from the UTI and Mutual Funds for granting a
10-year tax holiday to the industries in North- East
region for taking away the power of the assessing officer
to make adjustments while accepting an income tax return
and for certain other tax concessions.
However, the proposed 10
per cent surcharge on income tax on companies, firms,
cooperative societies and most of the individuals, etc.
will be an anti-tax reform measure which will give a
fillip to tax evasion and black money, having a cancerous
growth in the country. It should be withdrawn.
Though the sops for the
housing sector are welcome, they are half-hearted. The
condition for the completion of construction before 1.4.
2001 for getting the deduction of Rs 75,000 on interest
on the loan is highly impracticable and must be removed.
For a real and most effective impact on the housing
activity, a deduction of, say, Rs. 20,000 per dwelling
unit from its annual value, as in the past, should be
proposed. In the alternative, the entire investment in
the housing sector for years should be excluded from the
purview of Section 69, for an unprecedented growth of
housing.
The Finance Minister
should grant the benefit of 10 per cent income tax on
long-term capital gains of unquoted shares also.
R. N. LAKHOTIA
New Delhi
* *
* * *
|