Wake-up call for Punjab &
Haryana
THE private tubewells of Punjab and
Haryana have been the backbone of the Green Revolution in
these states. However, these have not been an unmixed
blessing. They are responsible for causing a continuing
decline in the level of ground water which, in turn, has
been making the tubewells operation more and more
expensive.
As a damage control
measure, the state governments have been increasing the
subsidy for the electricity consumed by the tubewells,
but this failed to neutralise the ever-increasing loss
suffered by farmers. All said and done, relief of this
nature could only treat the symptom and not the disease.
The only professional remedy for the disease is to
somehow arrest the decline in the level of ground water.
For this, two options were
available. The first was to reduce the withdrawal of
groundwater; this would have been an anti-development
action and hence could not be adopted. The second was to
accelerate the recharge by artificial means; this was a
desirable one but for some unknown reason, neither of the
states adopted it and the man-made crisis of tubewells
continues. What is surprising is that this important
lapse has not only escaped the notice of the Press but
also failed to catch the imagination of farmers in
general and the bureaucracy in particular. That is why
till today this issue is not even on the agenda of the
states.
Readymade technology for
accelerating the recharge is not available from any other
state in India. As a matter of fact, the factors
governing it are so variable that every state has to
develop its own, depending upon its specific conditions.
Necessity being the mother of inventions, both these
states are expected to show enough of enterprising spirit
for experimentation with innovative ideas. In the public
interest, irrigation professionals can lend a helping
hand to the states by giving their suggestions for
tackling this problem.
One such suggestion is
that both states should make use of the rain-water which
at present is being allowed to go waste via a network of
drains. This can be done by setting up recharging
stations all along the length of drains where water can
be desilted round the clock in a foolproof manner before
injecting it into the specially designed bore holes. This
has not been tried anywhere in India.
Such stations are perhaps
the last hope of private tubewells facing the threat of
extinction. No other surplus water is available with
these states. Not only this, if the present decline in
the ground water is not arrested, brackish water from the
adjoining areas can intrude into the sweet water zones.
This can be an irreversible ecological disaster and needs
to be guarded against at all costs.
No government, much less
the farmer-friendly and progressive ones of Punjab and
Haryana, can afford to ignore these danger signals any
longer. Enough damage has already been caused by
following the policy of wait and watch. The
minimum that they should now do as a token of their
earnestness to tackle this problem is to set up 50 such
stations on a pilot basis before the monsoon season in
1999. And while doing this, they shall be killing two
birds with one stone saving their tubewells from
extinction and washing off the stigma of allowing their
rain-water from going waste in this age of water
shortage.
S.P. MALHOTRA,
Formerly
Engineer-in-Chief
Irrigation Deptt, Haryana
Panchkula
Lessons
from history
Mr S.S. Dhanoa in
his article Lessons from history lost in
feud (January 20) has not clearly stated
the lessons lost. He has rather tried to
underestimate the glorious history of the
Shiromani Akali Dal.
The foundation of
the SAD was neither laid out of expediency nor
for projecting one-up-manship. History is replete
with instances of sacrifice and service. It can
only be understood with reference to the role of
the Akalis in the fast changing historical
situation from 1920, when the SAD came into
existence.
There was the
largest Sikh heritage consisting of the sayings
and the great deeds of the Gurus which are
contained in Sri Guru Granth Sahib. They derived
their beliefs and inspirations from this holy
scripture. For them gurdwaras became the
nerve-centre to perform kirtan and maintain the
institution of langar.
The main objective
of the Akalis was to evolve and establish a
representative body of the Sikhs to manage
panthic affairs.
The spirit of
sacrifice and adherence to the creed of
non-violence were the basic traits inculcated by
the Akalis. The massacre of 130 Akali devotees
inside the premises of Gurdwara Janam Asthan,
Nankana Sahib, and the inhuman torture inflicted
on the non-violent and peaceful jathas at the
Guru-ka-Bagh morcha, are the unique examples
which go to depict the spirit of sacrifice and
non-violence.
The historical
background of the SAD is beyond reproach. But the
present feud between the Akali stalwarts in the
centenary year of the Khalsa is very unfortunate.
AMARJIT
SINGH PABLA
Nawanshahr
|
Hardcore fundamentalists
I fail to understand why
Mr Madan Lal Khurana says that his head hangs in shame
over the killing of an Australian missionary and his sons
by fundamentalist forces. Instead, he should claim the
Arjuna Award for their Bollywood style bravery, because
after all Mr Khurana belongs to the party which has been
instrumental in turning the ordinary citizens of this
country into hardcore fundamentalists.
If the dreams of the BJP
are now coming true, why all this shame?
However, even the
crocodile tears of the gentleman are welcome if he at
least chooses to call these forces by their original name
Hindutva forces, instead of pseudo-Hindutva
forces. Otherwise, poor dictionary shall run into many
volumes if every word is preceded by pseudo.
SATISH KUMAR
Ambala Cantt
* *
* *
Electoral
reforms
With reference to Mr Hari
Jaisinghs thought-provoking write-up
Electoral reforms: two-party system only way
out (January 29), the fact of the matter is that
party politics has been having a tough time lately,
denounced by voters and despised by some politicians
themselves. What the nation needs to realise is that
there is one entity called the country and another called
the party. The former is virtuous and the latter is
wicked but, as it so often happens in this veil of tears,
the wicked have so far triumphed. Sincere efforts need to
be made to neutralise the wicked.
The existing system need
not lead to instability provided it is slightly modified.
Once an elected government assumes office, there should
be a constitutional prohibition on a motion of
no-confidence for a specified period, say two or three
years. If a Bill is defeated, if the modifications on the
budget suggested by the Opposition are voted, it would
not amount to a vote of no-confidence.
The advantage of the above
system would be that after the specified tenure
Parliament could decide that it no longer reposes
confidence in the government and the government would
then fall. Having a security of two or three years
tenure, the Prime Minister and his government could
proceed to govern without having to succumb to political
blackmail which has become the order of the day.
K.M. VASHISHT
Mansa
PERSONALITY
POLITICS: In his analytical assessment of the
growth of the multi-party system in India, the writer has
highlighted the degenerating impact of defections, money
power and criminal elements on our electoral process.
With the focus of political activity shifting to regional
grievances, many a personality-based splinter group has
sprung up, with no firm ideology or definite programme.
Such regional parties, through their nuisance
value, exact their share of the spoils.
The personality politics,
which started with Indira Gandhi, has now flowed down to
smaller groups of the likes of Mr Laloo Yadav and Ms
Jayalalitha. Even todays Congress is more of a
reflection of Mrs Sonia Gandhis personality than
the ideology of Gandhian and Nehruvian vision.
The suggestion of a
two-party system needs a serious consideration.
VED GULIANI
Hisar
PERTINENT DEMAND: There
is no gainsaying the fact that the existing
loophole-ridden electoral system has been crying for
reforms since long. The nation at large has, over the
years, voiced the pertinent demand with a shrill
crescendo. However, sadly and strangely, the powers that
be have all along betrayed a painfully lackadaisical
attitude in the matter. Apparently, it appears that the
country's political parties/politicians have developed a
vested interest in the status quo and, as such, they
prefer to maintain the obtaining "anarchy" so
that they can manage to be in power, as the writer
bluntly observes.
No doubt, the multi-party
system has failed to deliver the goods. The sooner it is
replaced by a two-party system, the better for the
polity. The question is: would the powers that be opt for
the drastic recipe/reform as suggested by Mr Jaisingh?
Well, I have my doubts. To my mind, the desideratum would
remain a far cry unless some cataclysmic change takes
place, or some messiah appears out of the blue.
TARA CHAND
Ambota (Una)
* *
* *
|