SPECIAL COVERAGE
CHANDIGARH

LUDHIANA

DELHI


THE TRIBUNE SPECIALS
50 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE

TERCENTENARY CELEBRATIONS



M A I N   N E W S

Food Bill in LS amid protests
AIADMK opposes it; DMK wants changes
Tribune News Service & PTI

New Delhi, August 7
The much-debated Food Security Bill, which aims to provide the country’s 67 per cent of the population the right to highly-subsidised food, was introduced in the Lok Sabha today amid sloganeering and protest by the Opposition over the killing of five Indian soldiers by the Pakistan Army yesterday.

The government rejected apprehensions that it would impinge upon the rights of states. Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj said: “Food Security Bill will be passed, but border security is more important than food security".

Food Minister KV Thomas introduced the fresh Bill after withdrawing an earlier one along with the ordinance which was promulgated on July 5.

Moving the National Food Security Bill, 2013, which promises to give 5 kg of foodgrains to the country’s 80 crore people at Rs 1 to 3 per kg every month, Thomas said there is nothing in it against the states. “It does not impinge upon the rights of states. It protects the Constitution,” he said allaying apprehensions expressed by Tamil Nadu parties, the AIADMK and the DMK, over the new law.

He said any concern the members had could be debated when the Bill comes up for discussion in the House.

Earlier, AIADMK member M Thambidurai opposed the introduction of the Bill saying it is against the Constitution and federal structure. “It is not Food Security Bill, it is actually Food Insecurity Bill,” he said, adding it should be brought only after consultations with the states.

DMK leader T R Baalu also said his party has issues with the Bill in its present form and would move amendments.

“It should not be detrimental to the state’s off-take (of food),” he said, noting that the proposed legislation will have far-reaching implications.

Bihar CM Nitish Kumar expressed support to the legislation but voiced concern over the possible increase in financial burden on the state exchequer. “We support Food Security Bill (but)... we have some concerns. We want to implement it but we are concerned about the additional financial burden on states,” he said.

The Bill

  • The Bill promises to give 5 kg of foodgrains to the country’s 80 crore people at Rs 1 to 3 per kg every month
  • Food Minister KV Thomas introduced the fresh Bill after withdrawing an earlier one along with the ordinance promulgated on July 5

Who said what

It (the Bill) does not impinge upon the rights of states. It protects the Constitution.

KV Thomas, Food Minister

Food Security Bill will be passed, but border security is more important than food security.

Sushma Swaraj, Leader of the Opposition

It is actually Food Insecurity Bill. It should be brought only after due consultations with the states.

M Thambidurai, AIADMK

Back

 

 





 



HOME PAGE | Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Opinions |
| Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi |
| Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail |