|
Decks cleared for nuke plant at Kudankulam New Delhi, May 6 Apprehensions expressed by some sections of the public that possible radioactive effects of the plant would have far-reaching consequences not only for the present generation but also for the future generation had “no basis,” a Bench comprising Justices KS Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra ruled in a 247-page judgment. Virtually rejecting a bunch of petitions challenging the go-ahead given by the Madras High Court, the SC pointed out that “larger public interest of the community should give way to individual apprehension of violation of human rights and right to life guaranteed under Article 21.” Nevertheless, the apex court directed the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL), the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to oversee each and every aspect of safety, impact on environment, quality of various components and system before commissioning the plant. Major riders
Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) clearances a must Environment Ministry, AERB should monitor compliance of safety norms Constant vigil by NPCIL, AERB mandatory NPCIL should send periodic reports to AERB
|
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |