|
Reducing poverty
Cruising to success
Trivialised |
|
|
Strategy to tackle poverty
The VP’s ‘darshan’
‘The bottomline is that these mosquito bites from Pakistan must stop’
|
Reducing poverty India is behind Nepal, Bangladesh and Rwanda in poverty reduction, according to an Oxford University study released recently. The study, based on research in 22 countries, measured poverty through a Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) which looked at indicators like health, education and living standards. The study does not throw up a single formula for decreasing poverty.
Bangladesh improved on sanitation and school attendance; Nepal scored on nutrition, electricity and child mortality; and Rwanda excelled in sanitation and water. At the current rate of progress these countries can eradicate poverty as assessed by the MPI in 20 years, while it will take India 41 years to do so. Within India the best-performing states are Kerala and Andhra Pradesh and the worst are Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal. The Oxford study puts a question mark on the efforts of the Centre and states to lift the poor out of poverty. Opinion is divided on India’s definition of poverty. Earlier, it was assessed on the basis of the amount spent to consume a certain number of calories, which put the number of people below the poverty line at 27.5 per cent of the population. Later, a committee set up under economist Suresh D. Tendulkar calculated poverty taking into account the spending on food, health and education. This put the number of the poor in India at 37.2 per cent, which fell to 29.8 per cent by 2011. There has been some reduction in poverty in recent years but not enough. After the 1991 economic reforms the GDP growth rate has accelerated but so have income disparities. India may be shining, Bharat is not. For inclusive growth the Centre and states focus more on handouts to the poor than spending on water, nutrition, affordable houses, education, health and employment generation. Systemic leakages ensure a large part of freebies do not reach the poor. The PDS has failed to deliver in many parts of the country. Malnutrition persists though food rots in the open. Focus must shift from populism to over-all human development if India is to emerge as a genuine economic power. |
Cruising to success
The
successful test-firing of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile that was launched underwater is an important milestone in the nation’s quest of acquiring weapons that would act as deterrents. The supersonic missile, which is built with Russian collaboration, is said to be the first of its kind in the world. The launch is also a much-needed shot in the arm of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) since it comes just a week after its long-range subsonic cruise missile Nirbhay veered off-target and had to be remotely detonated before it could complete its flight. The 290-km-range and speed make the newly tested version of the cruise missile a formidable anti-ship weapon. The BrahMos project has empowered the nation, with its ship and ground-launched versions. BrahMos, a portmanteau formed from the names Brahmaputra and Moskva rivers, is a good example of successful Indo-Russian defence collaboration. The DRDO and NPO Mashinostroyenia have shown how they can work well together. The Russian Federation and India have been gainers from the experience. During a recent visit of Defence Minister A K Antony to Russia, they agreed to broaden cooperation on developing the next generation air-launched hypersonic BrahMos-2 missile. Such a missile would be capable of speeds of 3,800-5,300 mph. The success of the 15-year-old programme, in spite of some failures along the way, shows how excellence can be built into systems and organisations. While the DRDO cannot claim an unalloyed record, the latest achievement will give it a boost. The changing and challenging geo-political environment has necessitated increasingly sophisticated weapons systems, and the BrahMos is yet another weapon in the arsenal that India needs to successfully negotiate an increasingly complicated world. Our scientists and defence engineers who were tasked with producing such weapons have demonstrated their capability yet again. |
|
Trivialised
When atrocities against women are on the rise, one expects the elected representatives of our democracy to be a bit deferential towards women, at least in the case of women of substance. When the criminal justice system is aiding faster delivery of gender-related cases with modern, reformed and just laws to help women fight social injustices, it is shocking how our political class continues to live in a time-warp of obsolete patriarchy.
Their behaviour continues to echo a nineteenth century mindset that lulls them into the slumber of delusion of their gender superiority. Else, how could an MLA from Haryana pass derogatory remarks on a national-level woman coach of kabaddi, under whose tutelage India has won six gold medals in different international events? Sunil Dabas is also the first woman coach from Haryana and the fourth in the nation who is conferred with a Dronacharya award. These are not small feats for a woman who hails from a small village in Jhajjar district. The incurable myopia of these so-called leaders fails a fair vision when it concerns a woman’s accomplishments. Then their foot in the mouth disease compels them invariably to pass a comment on the way a woman dresses up. In this particular case when the MLA suggested the woman coach should wear a ‘decent’ dress like saree or salwar-kameez, he not only showed a complete lack of common sense for the requirements of clothing of a kabaddi coach, but also undermined all her other accomplishments by trivialising her person to her dress. In the debate preceding the clearance of the anti-rape Bill, one witnessed the same mindset, where politicians of all shades romanticised women as devi, mata and behen but refused to acknowledge them as persons equal to them. Quite befittingly, in this case, the young girls of the engineering college where the MLA was invited protested against his objectionable behaviour, forcing him to leave. Next time, hopefully, the MLA will wake up from his patriarchal slumber to acknowledge women’s power. |
|
A table, a chair, a bowl of fruit and a violin; what else does a man need to be happy? —Albert Einstein |
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |