I read the letters under the heading
“Gandhi and Partition” (Perspective, Oct 3 and Aug 29) with great interest. All the writers observed that Partition was a tragedy for Mahatma Gandhi. He was very much disappointed at that time. One of them said that the Congress Working Committee members including Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Patel agreed to Mountbatten’s Partition plan against Gandhiji’s wishes and without his consent.However, Gandhi, after Patel and Nehru persuaded him, had accepted the Partition plan. That’s why, the people wanted to see the country’s unification began to cry and complain. Over Gandhiji’s U-turn, their disappointment is reflected in their writings. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, in his autobiography India Wins Freedom (Page 203) writes thus:
“I received the greatest shock of my life for I found that he (Gandhji) too had changed. In despondency I (Maulana) said at last “If even you (Gandhiji) have now adopted these views (views of accepting position), I see no hope of saving India from catastrophe”.
Besides, Faiz Ahmed Faiz, in his symbolic poem named Siyasi Leader Ka Nam, too, complains somewhat in similar words. The Siyasi leader denotes Gandhiji (see Faiz-Nama by Ayyoob Mirza, p. 70). He writes:
Tera Sarmaya (assets) Teri aas (hope) Yehi Hath (Hindu-Muslim) to hain; Aur kuchh bhe to nahin pass yehi hath (Hindu-Muslim) to hain,
Tujh ko manzoor nahin Ghalba-e-Zulmat
(slavery) lakin,
Tujh ko manzoor hai hath Oalam ho jaen
(Hindu-Muslim to be separated),
Aur Mashriq ki kameengah mein dharkta hua din (emergence of Independence)
Rat ki ahni mayyit ke tale dab jae (crush under the dead body of slavery).
SAJEELA PARVEEN, Malerkotla