|
Grain policy-what policy?This refers to the editorial “Grain policy — what policy?” Actually there are three recommendations on prices — the third one being: “OMSS prices should not only cover the procurement costs but should also fully reflect the differences in cost of transport and storage at different points of sale”. The editorial, however, has not commented on this. This policy, if implemented, will make major subsidy reduction e.g. keeping a near uniform issue price under the open market sales scheme. The
Government/FCI under the scheme sold 25 lakh tonnes of wheat in the deficit areas, thereby losing around Rs 375 crore. (This does not include government sponsored programmes). More so, this wheat was
purchased by private trade and industry for sale processing without any control on the sale price of end products. Neither consumers got any benefit of this subsidisation nor did the government save on subsidy. The entire process benefited trade and industry in the recommendation, which is of paramount importance. The government, however, is not likely to implement this due to vested interests who utilise their political and bureaucratic peer pressure and clout. Referring to your objections to the second proposal of scrapping all levies, I would state that if we have to succeed under the WTO regime, the pricing and taxation have to be on global level only. That is no MSP and taxes of any kind. In the global environment where intense competition entails, the prices have to be determined by the market forces and tax levels have to be as per global standards. The government did not accept the recommendation of the Commission of Agricultural Costs and Pricing which had recommended a price of Rs 520. For the government’s survival, the MSP was increased by Rs 30 (from Rs 580 to Rs 610). Needless to mention that areas where procurement is not taking place, the price of wheat hovers from Rs 480 to Rs 500 only. There is no private purchase in Punjab. A large quantity of wheat has also moved in Haryana from UP and Rajasthan resulting in the procurement of more than 61 lakh tonnes till date. It is incorrect to state that the Centre collects the tax from the consumer. Never ever has the FCI been able to realise the economic cost from the consumer. Look at the ever-increasing subsidy bill. It is transfer of funds only. Imagine a situation where the Centre does not reimburse “cost plus administrative expenses plus efficiencies/inefficiencies of government machinery” to the procuring states and the states have to procure grains on their own strength and subsequently dispose of the grain in the domestic market/exports market. Recently Markfed exported wheat on government approved rates of Rs 4150/4250 per MT for ports. To deliver the grains at the port, an additional cost of Rs 1,250 be Rs 3,000 per tonne against the previous year’s economic cost of Rs 8,500 per tonne. Who bears this difference of Rs 5,500 per tonne? — the tax-payers of the country. While the Food Minister takes great pride in having sold wheat worth Rs 2,800 crore for exports, yet no statement is made in its economic/actual costs which was Rs 6,800 crore. We as a nation face protein energy malnutrition and the 30 per cent population categorised as BPL families cannot afford to buy grains. Instead of exporting and incurring such huge losses to, feed mostly the importing countries’ animals with a better wheat, we should have fed the nation and improved their nutritional and health status. This requires a mission mode which, however, is only restricted to speeches. VINOD
KAPOOR, Panchkula
The Sachi Sakhi
controversyThe sort of noises being made by Bibi Kiranjot Kaur are more likely to be counter-productive. The Sachi Sakhi author, Kapur Singh, ICS, was highly respected for his authority on Sikh affairs. Master Tara Singh, now being defended by Bibi Kiranjot Kaur, a member of the SGPC, was very close to Kapur Singh. Master Tara Singh even stayed with Kapur Singh at Dharamsala, when the latter was posted there as Deputy Commissioner. Later during partition, Master Tara Singh's conduct came under criticism by his earlier friend, Kapur Singh, as he believed Master Tara Singh let down the Sikhs by not asking for a separate state and threw the Sikhs "with their hands and feet tied" before the preponderant majority and at their mercy. At a Sikh congregation at Sisganj Gurdwara in Delhi, someone proposed raising a memorial to Master Tara Singh which Kapur Singh opposed comparing him (Master Singh) to Marshal Petain and Admiral Darlan of France who constituted the French government when the country was overrun by Hitler's Germany. Later, both these leaders were indicted traitors and punished. Admiral Darlan was executed while Marshal Petain was spared as he was suffering from incurable cancer and was about to die. We, the following, have had the honour of meeting Master Tara Singh and we all agree with the reading of the current and recent history of the Sikhs in the Independence era as recorded by Kapur Singh. We do not agree with the outbursts of Bibi Kiranjot Kaur against the author of Sachi Sakhi and his opinion against Master Tara Singh's political conduct. We strongly recommend that Sachi Sakhi be reprinted in its original version. If political compulsions of the SGPC come in the way, let some NRI do it as was done earlier by a Canadian Sikh. SOHAN SINGH, KARNAIL SINGH JOHAL &
OTHERS, Mohali ‘Sangat darshan’All Punjab Government Departments, municipal corporations, improvement trusts, PUDA, M.L.A.s, Mayors, Chairmen, ministers and the Chief Minister of Punjab appear to have awakened from a sound sleep of four years. Daily new development schemes are announced involving crores of rupees. The "sangat darshan" programmes also cost heavily. The schemes, which could not be formulated in the past four years, are now launched for implementation in five or six months. No public money should be spent till the elections and all powers should be vested with the Commissioners or the Deputy Commissioners. B. S. SHARMA, Amritsar Double standardsThis refers to a news item about the Punjabi University Teachers Association President, Dr. B.S. Khera’s dharna on the denial of senior scale to a few faculty members. On one side he staged a dharna against the Vice-Chancellor, on the other he became an instrument in the hands of a coterie in getting a Reader rejected for promotion to Professor in Panjab University, Chandigarh, where he acted as an expert on the selection committee. The leaders of teachers associations should have a uniform yardstick for teachers as and when they get a chance to help them. D.P. SHARMA, Chandigarh
|