Gujrals views on foreign
policy
The interview that the
former Prime Minister and External Affairs Minister of
India, Mr I.K. Gujral, gave to Mr Hari Jaisingh was
timely (Indias image is not the issue,
interest is: Gujral, Oct 14).
The interview covered
various foreign policy issues, including Indias
stand on the CTBT and its relations with P-5, G-8, NAM
and neighbouring countries. However, Mr Gujrals
comment on his initiative on Indias case for
permanent membership of the UN Security Council was
missing.
He has been perfect in the
conduct of our external affairs, but his handling of the
media has gone a sea change since he bowed out as
Minister for Information and Broadcasting during the
Emergency.
The Ministry of External
Affairs may take a leaf out of the book of Mr Gujral, of
course, after updating it in the light of the
developments after Pokhran-II.
SAT PAL SHARMA
Patiala
* *
* *
The
holiday problem
Apropos of the report
Series of holidays boon or bane? (October 5),
the closure of government offices for eight successive
days was, indeed, a cruel joke on the people of a poor
country like India.
Shockingly enough, only a
couple of days after the publication of the above report,
the Himachal Pradesh government declared a gazetted
holiday for women employees on account of Karva Chauth.
So much for the effect of such write-ups on the
authorities.
By the way, may I know why
such a special gesture was shown to the women staff of
HP? When women can (and did) attend their offices in
other parts of the country, what is the problem in
Himachal Pradesh? In all probability, the HP government
will be forced to declare such a holiday in future also.
In fact, we could even be hearing of agitations in other
parts of the country in support of a demand for Karva
Chauth holiday for women employees on Himachal
pattern.
Incidentally, I cant
help recalling a speech delivered by Prime Minister Atal
Behari Vajpayee (ironically) at Shimla in June this year
in which he called upon the people to firmly unite to
meet the challenge posed by the sanctions (imposed by
certain countries in the wake of the nuclear tests
conducted by India) and render those negative measures
ineffective. My question is: when the government itself
does not bother about the burden on the nations
economy while declaring so many holidays, how can it
expect the common man to respond to its call?
SURENDRA MIGLANI
Kaithal
* *
* *
The
Tajewala story
This refers to the
editorial an avoidable crisis (Oct 21). The
Yamuna originates from the Yamnotri and has no catchment
area in Haryana upstream of Tajewala. While unprecedented
rain just before Divali was reported in Haryana, there is
no way it could have caused an increase in water flow of
river at Tajewala.
Further, the popular
perception that Haryana releases excess water into the
Yamuna from Tajewala and this affects Delhi is totally
devoid of truth. The truth is that Tajewala is only a
barrage and not a dam. It is meant to divert the water of
the Yamuna into the canals of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh.
In the case of a barrage, there is no storage facility
like dams, and any quantity of water beyond the capacity
of the canals has to be released into the river. The
guidelines of the Central Water Commission, based on the
model studies, prescribe that water must not be diverted
into the canals when the flow in the Yamuna exceeds
70,000 cusecs, as there is the possibility of heavy
boulders flowing in the river making their way to canals
causing heavy damage.
Thus, as soon as the water
flow upstream of Tajewala exceeds 70,000 cusecs,
engineers of the state government manning the Tajewala
headworks are supposed to open all the gates of the
barrage and close the canal gates simultaneously so that
the entire water of the river flows uninterrupted. They
are also supposed to inform the authorities downstream
about the quantum of discharge in the river.
On that unfortunate day
October 17 when the discharge in the river
began to exceed 70,000 cusecs, the subdivisional officer
posted at the Tajewala headworks was fully alert and got
the gates of the barrage opened. During this operation,
one out of total of 10 gates of the barrage got stuck and
was ultimately washed away with the gushing waters.
Technically speaking, the impact of an open gate or the
one washed away is the same. Although reconstruction of
the gate would involve an additional expenditure from the
state exchequer, for the situation on hand it made no
difference. Not even one drop of extra water reached
Delhi because of the washing away of the gate.
The state government had
alerted the people along the river and taken effective
steps to avert any loss of life and property. The Chief
Engineer (Floods), Government of Delhi, Mr A.K. Gupta,
was informed on the phone by Superintending Engineer,
Haryana Irrigation, posted at Delhi on October 18 at 7
a.m. about the excessive flow of water from Tajewala,
which normally takes about 60 hours to reach Delhi.
R.K. KHULLAR
DPR, Haryana
Chandigarh
* *
* *
Onion
prices
The sky-rocketing prices
of onions are causing agony to housewives all over the
country. To consider that all this is man-made due to our
planners mistakes makes the matters still worse.
Firstly, the government
kept on exporting onions without considering the effect
of the expected shortfall due to vagaries of weather. The
worst part is the meagre quantity of 13,000 tons, which
we read in the papers, that the government is importing
to relieve pressure on the rising prices. It is amazing
as to how the planners sitting in airconditioned offices
have arrived at this figure. The population of the
country is now nearly 90 crore and allowing 4-5 members
per family, there are nearly 25 crore families to be
served by this imported quantity.
To have some relief in the
near future, the only answer is for all the housewives to
stop the use of onions in the kitchen. Nobody is going to
die if we leave the onions for a short while. This method
has been successfully employed by consumers in Western
countries, and there is no reason to believe that it will
not succeed here.
LIEUT-COL SARWAN
SINGH (retd)
Chandigarh
* *
* *
|