|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Man opens fire at wedding
Bassi Pathana, October 22 The injured youth, who was yet to be identified, was rushed to the Civil Hospital. The police was trying to record the statement of the boy but the doctors did not allow as the victim was not in position to give the statement. According to sources, the trouble began when a youth, identified as Sagar had objected to the teasing of the girls during the function. After failing to restrict the opposite party he fired, resulting in injuring one person. The police has not register any case against Sagar ,who had immediately fled from the spot. The sources said an old enmity could not be ruled out, however, it could not be confirmed as the police was still investigating the case. The police was also making enquiry whether the organisers had sought permit to serve liquor during the function. SHO Bassi Pathana Shamsher Singh said the injured was admitted to the hospital. However, he added that they were not allowed to record the statement as he was critical. He said a case would be registered only after recording the statement from the victim.
|
|||||
|
Two killed, one injured in road accidents in Dera Bassi, Lalru
Dera Bassi, October 22 In another accident, which occurred at Lalru, one person died and another was injured. The deceased was identified as Heera Lal of Bogha village, Chandoli district, Uttar Pradesh and the injured was identified as Vidyachand. The accident occurred when the victims were standing near the national highway and suddenly a tempo (HR66-4600) hit them. Heera Lal died on the spot. The police had registered a case against an unidentified tempo driver under Sections 279,338 and 304A of the IPC.
|
||||||
|
Dera Bassi, October 22 The camp was held in the memory of Koshish Society founder late Mohan Bindal. The camp was inaugurated by chief guest Binderpal Mittal, chairman of Sushma Builtech, while Amritpal, Harjinder Rangi, Prem Sagar and Satish Gupta were present as special guests. Kanta Bindal, the widow of Mohan Bindal, honoured the donors. — OC
|
||||||
|
Ropar, October 22 The tourney was conducted under the aegis of Punjab Technical Institutes Sports (PTIS). The team registered a 2-0 win over the rivals. ––TNS
|
||||||
|
80-year-old woman robbed of jewellery
Ambala, October 22 According to Darshan, the women diverted the car towards Ambala-Hisar road. After some time one of the women forcibly took out her gold bangles. Darshan said the windows of the car were bearing black film so she could not ask for help. After leaving Darshan near Sullar village, the women managed to flee. The matter was reported to the police and no clue of the women had been achieved till now.
|
Anupama case: PGI, CTU told to file replies by Oct 30
Chandigarh, October 22 Following the Forum’s directions, PGI today submitted Anupama’s medical record in the court during the hearing of the case. The premier healthcare institute, however, sought more time to file its reply. Anupama, a student of Government Model School Sector 18, died on July 25, after she was admitted to PGI’s on July 17 when her leg was crushed under the rear tyre of a CTU bus on her way back home from school. Her parents, Amit and Konika Sarkar, have demanded a compensation of Rs 85 lakh for negligence at the hands of both CTU and PGI staff, which according to them, resulted in Anupama’s death. The petition states, “Injured Anupama was taken to the Advanced Trauma Centre of the PGI by the police authorities, where her left leg was bandaged by Dr. Jhujhar, doctor on duty. The bandaging was done in the most incompetent manner. The blood kept on oozing out, despite the bandaging.” “Her parents were told that the injured girl required an emergency operation, which is being arranged by the doctors concerned. X-rays and other tests were carried out, and the complainants deposited the requisite fees for the same,” the petition read further. Supporting the demanded compensation of Rs 85 lakh, the counsel also contended that Anupama was the only support of her parents, who manage their living with a monthly income of Rs 6,000. Dr. Jujhar, the treating doctor and Dr. Murali, who conducted the post-mortem examination have also been made respondents in the case.
|
||
Trader duped of Rs 1 lakh
Chandigarh, October 22 The police said when the bank employee at the cash counter refused to accept Rs 1 lakh, a conman, who was noticing Sharma, approached him, and posed a bank employee. He asked Mandeep to give him the cash so that he could deposit it. The CCTV footage of the cameras revealed that the conman disappeared after taking the cash. The police have registered a case and scrutinising the CCTV footage. The police said the image of the conman was clearly visible and they were questioning the bank employees. A case was registered at the police station, Sector 3 and the police has started investigation.
|
||
Chief referee’s appointment raises eyebrows
Chandigarh, October 22 Notably, the local association has appointed a ‘chief referee’ along with a match commissioner, a match inspector and a nine-member panel of referees. “This is the first time I heard the word ‘chief referee’. There is no chief referee in our game and moreover, I don’t know for what the local association has appointed the person,” said Gautam Kar, AIFF’s head of referees, while talking over the phone. “In the ongoing tournament, the AIFF has no direct role to play. Although it is backed by the organisation, we only provide the team with concession travel plans and ask our local association to conduct the tourney smoothly. We don’t interfere in organising games,” said Gautam. When asked, about the role of the match commissioner and match inspector, the official added, “The match commissioner heads the administrative part of the game, including looking after the tournament. The match inspector judge a referee’s role in organising the match,” explained Gautam. The roles of match commissioner and match inspector are already under scanner. It was reported in same columns on how the two officials were supposed to be present on two different venues at the same time. “This is natural that a human can’t perform the same duty on two separate places, at the same time,” added Gautam. Also performs fourth referee’s role During the ongoing tourney, the ‘chief referee’ was seen performing duties of the fourth referee. If rely on sources, the CFA has changed the panel of referees without informing the technical committee of the UT Sports Department. A few of the appointed referees opted to officiate other matches organised in Ropar and some were busy attending a physical education seminar in PU. “They must have informed the ‘chief referee’, but we were not aware of it. We saw new people officiating the matches. If they have made changes, they must have informed the organisers in written,” said co-convener of technical committee, UT Sports Department. Problem in semifinal match The lethargic approach of the officials was seen in the first semifinal match between Dalbir Football Academy and Mahilpur Football Academy, when the officials allowed fourth substitution during the tie-breaker. The Mahilpur team after making three substitutions sought to substitute the injured goalkeeper. However, it was objectioned. After that the match commissioner called an official of All India Football Federation to solve the matter. “It was a sheer mockery. The officials, who claim to be the best, allowed fourth substitution. It is after we raised an objection that they took a step. It is surprising that an appointed official needs to call others to solve the matter. If they claim the top official spot, they should perform it well,” said Dalbir Singh, head coach of the Dalbir Football Academy. UT Sports Department turns blind eye The main organiser, UT Sports Department, has turned a blind eye to the entire matter. A total of three professional soccer coaches and a former international Indian football team skipper and many other international-level coaches are serving the department. Yet the officials failed to take full advantages of their services. The department’s blind faith with the local association has also raised many eyebrows. An official seeking anonymity said, “To keep a check on the ongoing system, the department must have appointed their own coaches in the match. Moreover, they are taking decision without informing the department. If the department is paying them they (department) should keep a check on them. There should be proper criteria to organise a tournament of such high level,” said a coach. |
|
Neel Singh defeats Jaspreet, enters final
Mohali, October 22 On the other hand, Preet Nain defeated Naemat by 6-1, 6-1 in girls' under 16 category. Neel Singh took an early lead of 3-1 but Jaspreet fought back and managed to make him trail by 4-3. After keeping himself at the receiving end, Neel took a crucial lead of 5-4, and later ousted his opponent, in last set, by 6-4. Results Boys (U-10)-Mankeerat bt Pranav Chopra 6-2; Neel Singh bt Jaspreet 6-4; Boys (U-12) quarter-finals-Mankeerat bt Sakeel 6-1; Pranav bt Sumer Sandhu 6-3; Neel Singh bt Aryan 6-0; Manvir bt Sarabjot 6-0; semi-finals-Pranav Chopra bt Mankeerat 6-4; Manvir bt Neel Singh 6-2; Boys (U-14) quarterfinals-Aniket T bt Aniket 6-3; Ankush Nagpal bt Sumer Sandhu 6-5(7-4); Siddarth bt Shivam Vij 6-5(7-3); Semifinal-Aniket Khosa bt Jaideep 7-6(7-3);Men’s semi-finals-Manjot bt Parminder 6-3;Nikhil Sandhu bt Sumit 6-3; Girls (U-12)-Aditi Dogra bt Chahat 5-3,2-4,4-2;Girls(U-16)- Preet Nain bt Naemat 6-1,6-1; First round -Boys(U-10)-Gurviraj bt Aditya 6-0; Kanav bt Josh 6-3; Vansh bt Mankeerat 6-1; Dhariya bt Pratham 6-1; Neel bt Aditya raj 6-0;Boys (U-12)-Tushar bt Pranav 6-0; Kanav dev bt Shakeel 6-3; Adeesh bt Yugam Verma 6-0; Sumer Sandhu bt Shivam 6-2; Sarabjot bt Saharshveer 6-0; Sartaj bt Kabir Singh 6-0; Manvir bt Miahawan 6-1; Second round-Boys (U-10)-Pranav Chopra bt Karandev 6-1; Harmankeerat bt Vansh 6-1; Neel bt Tapan 6-0;Jaspreet bt Shakeel 6-3;Boys(U-12)-Neel bt Aryan 6-0; Manveer bt Sarabjot 6-0; Boys(U-14)-Navjot bt Simran 6-0;Aniket bt Sahil 6-2; Ankush bt Sumer 6-5(7-4);Siddarth bt Manveer 6-3; Men’s-Parminder bt Rajeev 6-4; Nikhil bt Abhishek 6-1; Girls(U-12) first round-Aditi bt Anandi 6-1; Rahat bt
|
|
Haryana pip J&K by one wicket
Chandigarh, October 22 With the victory, the Haryana team earned 4 points. After electing to field first, the winning side restricted JKCA team on 230 runs. Operners Ahmd Umer Bande and Sidharth Mangotra put on 69 runs in 10.3 overs before Siddharth was caught by Satyam Sharma off Punish Mehta for 29 off 25, studded with six boundaries. Paras Sharma (40), Sumaye Jain (22) and Umar Nazir (27) were the main scorers of the team. For bowling side, Punish Mehta claimed 5 for 53 while Shiva Yadav took 4 for 40.In reply, the Haryana team scored 232 for 9 on 48.3 overs. A 130 runs partnership for the 5th wicket between Lovekesh Kumar and Punish Mehta retrieved the position for Haryana. Lovekesh scored 75 off 112, with six boundaries, before being stumped by Jalal off Aquib Nazir while Punish Mehta scored 73 off 73 balls with 10 boundaries before geeting caught by Aquib Nazir off Rohit Sharma. For bowling side, Umar Nazir claimed 4 for 60 while Rohit Sharma and Aquib Nazir took 2-wickets each. Brief scores JKCA-230 all out in 49.4 overs (Ahmd. Umar 44, Siddharth Mangotra 29, Paras Sharma 40, Sumaye Jain 22, Umar Nazir 27 not out, Haryana-232 for 9 in 48.3 overs (Lovekesh Kumar 75, Punish Mehta 73, Shiva Yadav 31 not out, Umar Nazir 4 for 60, Rohit Sharma 2 for 39 and Aquib Nazir 2
|
|
|||||
| HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |
