|
|
|
|||||
|
House Tax Dues Attar Singh Tribune News Service
Ambala, January 13 The corporation has recovered Rs 70 lakh up to December 31, 2011, from house tax defaulters while the total arrears have been pegged at Rs 1.62 crore. Sources in the corporation said there were house tax arrears worth Rs 45 lakh in the big defaulters category, including private schools, in Ambala Cantt. In the second category were some Trusts whose arrears were to the tune of Rs 19 lakh and in the third category were religious places whose arrears were about Rs 16 lakh. A senior official in the Municipal Corporation said notices had already been served on the defaulters several times. He said the recovery of house tax arrears had been pending for many years. Many people have come forward to deposit their dues following the launch of the drive. The amount was being spent on the ongoing development works and he hoped that the pending arrears would also be cleared in the coming few months. The corporation, which has around 270 employees, has a monthly salary bill of Rs 35 lakh, the sources added. |
||||
No 21-day bar on LPG refill booking: IOC
Ambala, January 13 Verma had filed an appeal with the appellate authority of the IOC Amresh Kapoor, seeking the information whether the corporation had instructed its LPG distributors to exercise 21-day restriction on refill booking. He had complained in the appeal that the LPG distributors of Ambala booked refill after 21 days of the last delivery. It is to be mentioned that there are six LPG distributors of the IOC in Ambala City and Ambala Cantonment and most of them book the refill after 21 days of the last delivery which is causing great inconvenience to the consumer in this cold season. |
|||||
Rs 33.70 lakh, drugs seized
Fatehgarh Sahib January 13 |
HC issues notice to Panchkula school on land use
Chandigarh, January 13 The notice came on a review application filed by Vijay Pal Singh and other residents of Sector 7. They were seeking a review of a judgment dated December 16 last. Their counsel argued that the management of Ajay Memorial Public School could not be permitted to run even a primary school at the site allotted to it for running a nursery school. In the judgment, the High Court had earlier asserted: “The question as to whether the respondent society is to be permitted to run a school up to the fifth standard or not, would depend upon the terms and conditions laid down in the Haryana School Education Rules, 2003, as amended from time to time, and it may not be expedient for us to express any views in relation thereto. “The Nursery School, if upgraded up to the fifth standard, whether would cause serious inconvenience or prejudice to the residents of the locality due to substantial increase in the strength of the children or it may require additional construction at the site, etc., are several factors which shall have to be kept in view by the competent authority before taking any final decision in this regard in accordance with the policy and the rules on the subject. The plot size, however, shall remain the same without affecting the remaining area of the adjoining park.” In their review application, the petitioners’ counsel, HC Arora, submitted while issuing the directions on December 16 last, the Division Bench did not consider a judgment given by another Division Bench headed by Justice MM Kumar on February 24, 2009, wherein it was held that a High or Higher Secondary School cannot be run on a piece of land allotted by HUDA for running a nursery school, and vice versa. |
|||||
Aspiring doctor’s dream turns
sour
HCMI Education told to pay Rs 50,000, litigation costs and refund fee Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, January 13 The district forum, comprising president PD Goel and members Rajinder Singh Gill and Madanjit Kaur Sahota, directed the respondents to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation besides refunding the registration and tuition fee totalling $ 12,000 deposited by the complainant. The forum also directed the opposite parties to pay Rs 25,000 as costs of litigation. Narinder had submitted that the opposite parties had offered an MBBS course after assessing his educational qualification and he had deposited Rs 5,000 with the opposite party no. 1 towards the processing fees. He was issued a letter, according to which, he was required to submit the original certificates, along with $ 12,000 (tuition fee, foreign student fee and registration fee). He said he joined the course in Manila and while he was appearing for the last examination of the 2nd semester (biochemistry), the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), the Republic of Philippines, circulated a resolution among the students, in which it was stated that the opposite parties had offered the MBBS programme in spite of the absence of the CHED memorandum order prescribing curriculum of such programmes. He raised the protest with the opposite parties, which assured him of doing the needful, but they did nothing in the matter, he alleged. As a consequence he couldn’t complete the MBBS programme. Moreover, he was asked to join BSc (Biology), which was not part of the contract between him and the opposite parties, he alleged. The counsel for the opposite party no. 1 averred that the original certificates and fee deposited by the complainant was handed over to the opposite party no. 2 for formalising the admission to the MBBS course. It was pleaded that the said resolution was issued by the Government of Philippines, which changed the eligibility criteria resulting into the abolition of the MBBS programme, over which neither the opposite party no.1 nor anybody else had any control. The complainant was assured of not losing unit earned on account of 1st and the 2nd semester of the MBBS programme, as the same were to be adjusted in the BSc programme. Therefore, the question of refunding the amount, which had been paid by the complainant and in compensation for which the complainant had also availed the services, could not have arisen. The opposite party no 2 failed to present itself and was proceeded ex-parte. The forum observed that the opposite parties couldn’t escape/wriggle out from their responsibility/ liability. The callous/insensitive attitude of the opposite parties, not only had played a cruel joke on the aspiring career of the complainant, but also misled him regarding the genuineness of the said programme of MBBS degree, especially when they assured him to get a valid degree, subsequently on competition of the course. |
|||||
Consumer court penalises builder for delaying possession of plot
Mohali, January 13 The complainant, Anand Purak Singh, in his plea before the forum stated that he had purchased a flat from the promoter in Ivory Towers Complex on April 22, 2000, for Rs 11,50,000. As per the allotment letter and agreement of sale, the builder was under obligation to execute the sale deed of the flat in favour of the complainant within 30 days of the date of offer of possession. Immediately, after getting possession, the complainant requested the promoter on a number of occasions to get conveyance deed of the flat executed and registered in his favour. The promoter did not help the flat owner on the pretext that there was some outstanding issue pending between it and PUDA for which the complainant was in no way responsible. The complainant further alleged that the amount of registration fee in the year 2001 for the flat in question was Rs 70,000. But the promoter issued a notice to the purchasers for execution of the conveyance deeds only on March 26, 2009, after a delay of eight years. By the time, the rate of stamp duty increased to 8 per cent and the cost of flat as per collector rates was enhanced to Rs 22.56 lakh. The conveyance deed was ultimately executed by the complainant on March 11, 2010, after paying Rs 1,80,500 as stamp duty at the prevailing rates. In this way, the complainant had to pay an extra amount of Rs 1,10,500 solely due to delay in executing the conveyance deed on the part of the promoter. Despite his request and legal notice on October 28, 2011, the promoter did not reimbursed to him the said amount of Rs 1,10,500. After listening to the arguments of both the parties, the forum observed that the allottee had suffered because of the lapse on part of the builder. Thus, the complainant had to pay excess stamp duty and registration charges of Rs 1,10,500 to the government. For the reasons recorded above, the builder has been directed to refund to the complainant an amount of Rs 1,10,500 with interest thereon, at a rate of 9 per cent per annum with effect from March 11, 2010. |
|||||
Plea for booth allotment
Chandigarh, January 13 The petitioner has stated in the application that he had applied to the Estate Officer, Chandigarh, for the allotment of a built-up booth in the Sector 40 rehri market. The screening committee had declined his application for booth and later he filed an appeal before the Chief Administrator. Acting on his appeal, the Chief Administrator had sent back the case to the Estate Officer, asking him to reconsider the claim. Thereafter, the Assistant Estate Officer recommended that his case should be placed before the screening committee for consideration, the petitioner added. He has further stated that his case has been pending before the screening committee since 2009. He had sought directions to the officer concerned to settle his application as early as possible. |
|||||
|
|||||
Press owner arrested
Panchkula, January 13 The suspect has been identified as Madan Gopal of Plot no. 170 in Industrial Area Phase-1. The police said it received a complaint from Babloo Rai, an investigation officer of Parakletos Intelligence Company, Chandigarh, that Madan Gopal, the owner of the Blue Bird Card printing press, had been printing the CG logo of the Crompton Greaves company in his press without any authorisation from the company. A case has been registered under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copy Right Act of 1957 and 420 of the IPC against the owner of the Blue Bird Card printing press. |
|||||
Judge’s car hit by truck, driver booked
Chandigarh, January 13 The mishap occurred when the ADJ was coming to her Panchkula residence to celebrate Lohri. The Judge’s driver, Dharamveer Singh, was driving the car when the accident occurred. Luckily, no one was injured in the mishap while the car was badly damaged. A case has been registered at the Sector 31 police station. |
|||||
|
Sumit, Naoki lift cup
Chandigarh, January 13 The winning pair defeated Adriaan Du Toit of Republican South Africa and Jeroen Royakkers from Belium 6-4 and 6-2. On the other hand, pair of Oleksandra Korashvili of Ukraine and Le Roux Republican South Africa defeated Augustine-Benito (Spain) and Stojanovic (Serbia) by a margin of 7-5, 6-2, to lift the crown of girls’ (doubles) category. The Indian players had mixed fortunes as top seed Rishab Agarwal took his appointed place in the boy’s singles final and eighth seed Simran Kaur Sethi made her exit from the girl’s single event. In the singles category, Leksandra Korshvili defeated eighth seed Simran Kaur Sethi in eight sets 6-0, 6-1 to move into the finals. She will now face the top seed Ching-Wen Hsu of Taipei in the finals tomorrow. Ching-Wen ousted qualifier Min Chi Hsu of Taipei in easy straight sets 6-2, 6-1 in the second semi-final. In the boys’ (singles) category, Rishab Agarwal will lock horns against Hyeon Chung of Korea in the finals of tourney. In the semifinals clash Rishab defeated left handed Shao Chi Yang of Taipei in straight sets 6-2, 6-4 while Hyeon Chung beat Clement Geens of Belgium 7-5, 6-2 in the second semi-finals. Results: Boys singles’ (semifinals): Rishab Agarwal (Ind) b Shao Chi Yang (Tpe) 6-2, 6-4, Hyeon Chung (Kor) b Geens Clement (Bel) 7-5, 6-2. Girls singles’ (semi-finals): Ching-Wen Hsu (Tpe) b Min-Chi Hsu (Tpe) 6-2, 6-1, 2 Oleksandra Korashvili (Ukr) b 8-Simran Kaur Sethi (Ind) 6-0, 6-1. |
Pande’s ton adds to Punjab’s troubles
Chandigarh, January 13 After losing the opener quickly, the host team scored 222 for 3 in 90 overs with the help of Pande’s unbeaten 116 runs off 261 studded with 16 boundaries, contributing till the end of day’s play. CG Khurana gave away an early wicket to Punjab’s medium pacer Sandeep Sharma took before opening his account followed by the wicket of VH Zol after wicket keeper Mohit Handa caught him off Sandeep Sharma. Later, JS Pande and AA Salvi joined the crease and took the team to a respectable total before Navneet Singh caught Salvi off medium pacer Kamal Passi on 53 off 182. After his departure, SS Ranjne joined the century scorer and the duo took the total to 222 for 3. SS Ranjne remained unbeaten on 33 off 81 inclusive of three boundaries and one six. For the Punjab team, Sandeep Sharma took 2 for 54 and Kamal Passi claimed 1 for 48. Brief Scores: Maharashtra: 222 for 3 in 90 overs (JS Pande 116, AA Salvi 53, SS Ranjne 33, Sandeep Sharma 2 for 54, Kamal Passi 1 for 48) |
Kho-kho trials on January 18
Chandigarh, January 13 Interested players can contact Surinder Singh Bhandari (9814630280) for further details. |
Tata soccer tourney from Jan 16
Chandigarh, January 13 A total of 350 children from over 32 schools will participate in the two-day tournament. The winning team will compete in the national championship that will be held in Shillong with 14 teams from different states of the country. Also, 30 players from 15 cities will be trained by Inter-Milan and Indian coaches. |
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |