|
Fewer states, please
More states or small states (The Case Against
Division, December 11) are not the answer to poverty and under development. The country would actually be better off with fewer states. Ideally, we should have just four or five distinct administrative zones, which would put a check to rising administrative costs, reduce the number of politicians and help curb corruption. D.P. Jindal,
Mandi Govindgarh
All for small
Im in favour of smaller states and I support the proposal of Mayawati to divide the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) into four smaller ones, because smaller states are easy to govern. Due to the vast area of UP, which is even greater than most of the western countries, the administration has failed to solve even the basic problems of the people. It is, therefore, necessary to split the state into smallers ones. A few years ago, a new state, the Uttrakhand was carved out of UP for precisely this reason and now further division of UP into four states of Paschim Pradesh, Awadh Pradesh, Puranchal and Bundekhand would certainly be a wise step because the smaller states will be much easier to govern effectively and efficiently. R.K. Kapoor,
Chandigarh
Split? No way
Discerning people can read between the lines and see through the strategy and moves of
Mayawati. but sadly, not the majority of the people. It is not a question of Uttar Pradesh alone but involves the entire country. Will a division of UP benefit the nation is the question that needs to be answered. But we sadly lack nationalist fervour and few of us think in terms of national interest. A proposal to split the largest state cannot be passed in seconds, without a debate and just to suit the convenience of a political party. B.M. Singh,
Amritsar
Email your letters
Readers are invited to send their comments, criticism, suggestions and feedback of the Sunday issue to sundayletters@tribunemail.com The letters should not exceed 250 words.
|
|