|
Of legislators and public money IN a democracy, the politicians should not only be sensitive to public opinion but also keep an ear to the public perception of their conduct. That is why even though T.T. Krishnamachari was not personally held liable, he resigned from the Jawaharlal Nehru Cabinet. Similarly, Lal Bahadur Shastri, though not personally involved in the Railway accident, resigned. Those stories seem as if from a hoary past. I say this because the editorial,
“Aaj Ka MLA” (June 20) has very rightly criticised the Punjab Government’s practice to pay the Income-Tax of the MLAs and pertinently pointed out that they are not a breed apart. But it appears that our worthy legislators consider that Membership of the Assembly is not for the service of the poor but is the biggest opportunity for making money. I am shocked at the legislators’ attitude. I remember that long back some errant judges had floated the idea that as the Constitution fixes the pay and allowances during the tenure of the judge, judges should not be liable to pay Income-Tax if there is any increase during their tenure. Judges, who are no different from ordinary mortals and have necessarily the same weaknesses, had lost no time to reject it outright. This when the judges do not have to go back to the public for seeking re-election.
|
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |