|
The Pakistan Foreign Minister says that the American offer will bring parity between India and Pakistan. What parity and for what? It has been a tragic, if not absurd, concept in certain circles in Pakistan that it is equal to India. I am not saying India is superior but the vast difference in size and diversity can never make for parity. But that does not also mean that India wants to act superior. If peace, friendship and tranquility are the quest, size cannot matter. Nor is this criterion to be applied to China, Japan, and all the other countries of Asia. The acquisition of arms becoming armed to the teeth in a race can only benefit the armament industries of other countries who have their own imperialistic agenda. We cannot be a party to it. If Pakistan wants parity, can Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka not aspire for it also reducing the whole question to absurdity. We must look to peace and the arts of peace. We must reduce our armaments, even to nothing but a fraction. We need a continent of peace, not war. SOM
BENEGAL, New Delhi
IICriminal legislatures are the product of a political system that tolerates the sale and purchase of votes, impersonation, booth capturing etc, as well as sale and purchase of MPs/MLAs in making and unmaking of ministries. The need of the hour is to change the system. As the common people are the real sufferers, they can only undo the wrong and teach the politicians a lesson under the guidance of honest and fearless media and not the so-called MPs/MLAs elected through money or muscle power. PRAN SALHOTRA, Gurdaspur
IIIEvery right thinking person shares the anguish expressed by Mr Dua, on the state of affairs. President Kalam’s thoughts are noble. Arun Gawli and Pappu Yadav are, however, not so dangerous as the
Laloos, Shibu Sorens, Mayawatis, Jayalalithaas et al. The media should rectify the distortions in our political system by looking at things objectively and from a nationalistic angle. Godmen too should exhort their followers to lead a moral and ethical life on this planet than to prepare for life
after death. GEETANJALI KORPAL, Advocate, Amritsar
Churchill & ‘men of straw’
One point which appears rather incidentally in the middle, “Wardrobe malfunction” (March 26) just compels comment. It is the remark that “Churchill, with his tongue firmly in his cheek termed the Mahatma a “naked faqir”. This is impossible to understand. Far from making a tongue-in-cheek or ironical reference to the way Mahatma was dressed, Churchill was clearly ridiculing it in right earnest. In fact, he never made any secret of how poorly he thought of Indians and their leaders. When they happened to be in England for one of the Round Table conferences, an aide of Churchill suggested his meeting some of them as that might help him in clearing his views about India. Churchill is on record saying, “I am quite satisfied regarding my views on that subject and have no desire to meet any (expletive) Indians”. Again, bitterly apposed as he was to the British departing from India, he lamented that the country was being left in the hands of “men of straw”. SAROOP KRISHEN, Chandigarh
|
Limits to endurancePresident A.P.J. Abdul Kalam’s cautious address to the parliamentarians must be deliberated upon seriously and urgently to pull our democracy out of the quagmire created by political “horse trading” through unethical corrupt practices. In his front-page editorial “Some bare truths” (March 23),
H.K. Dua has rightly concluded that people in our country are patient, but there is a limit to endurance. We must fight corruption, gangsters and political tradability unitedly to prevent democracy from descending to anarchy and the rule of the jungle. Firm Presidential intervention is needed to prevent confrontation between the legislature and the judiciary. Also a strong electoral system with enhanced powers to the Election Commission is imperative. Brig H.S. CHANDEL (retd),
Malanger (HP)
|