|
|
|
HIGH COURT Chandigarh, May 7 It also asked the names and number of commercial organisations allotted land for running institutes/ schools. Resuming hearing in a public interest litigation (PIL) regarding alleged irregularities in allotment of 5.7 acres to influential persons, including two sons of a sitting Judge of the High Court, by the UT Administration, the Bench asked the Administration to submit a list of allottees who had been allotted land for running schools and institutions. In its order, the Bench noted that land was allotted to “private limited company” without any uniform policy being followed or the allotment being made on a uniform basis. The Bench also said the UT Administration had on January 19, 2002, taken a policy decision to consider allotment of land for religious/social/cultural/educational purposes to such societies and trust that were registered in Chandigarh for five years. However, Chandigarh Law Institute Private Limited, which was allotted land in Sector 38-A, the Bench noted, was a commercial venture. It also came to light that the allotment was made despite the stand of the officials of the Estate Office, Chandigarh, that the institute was neither registered at Chandigarh nor was it five-year-old and, therefore, not eligible to seek allotment. The Bench noted that overlooking or overruling the view of the officials, the Estate Officer decided to place the matter before the screening committee. Finally, land was allotted to the institute. Records also showed that the rate at which land was allotted was not in conformity with the existing rates for a commercial venture. The Bench could not find any record of the deliberations of the screening committee in the record submitted to the court. In its order, the Bench noted that availability of sites was kept a closely guarded secret and everything was done in a clandestine manner. It observed that the government was a trustee of the public and could not be allowed to breach the trust. Earlier, advocate Ajay Kaushik, counsel for petitioner, moved an application before the Bench seeking handing over of the case to the CBI for proper investigation. However, the Bench asked him to file the application in the registry. |
Bail plea of immigration racket accused dismissed Panchkula, May 7 High drama was witnessed at the District Courts Complex here today after his bail plea was rejected by the CJM, Mr Gulab Singh.Several complainants, who had gathered at the court, complained to the police in writing that Sikka had taken huge amounts from them on the pretext of sending them to New Zealand. Sources said fresh complaints were being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and the DSP, Mr Rajesh Duggal, was probing the matter. Sikka was arrested by the police on May 2 on a complaint of Mr Narinder Behl, a resident of Sector 21, on the charge of defrauding him of Rs 1.46 lakh on the prestext of sending him to New Zealand.
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | National Capital | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |