|
Differing with the editor,
Brigadier N .K. Gurung opines that our students should be given
realistic feels for the science-based rapidly changing society
of tomorrow. Jaya Indiresan argues that the much-talked-about
empowerment of women can be achieved only by their enrollment in
institutions of higher learning and at the same time by giving
them leadership training so as to make them self-reliant and
progressive. S. K. Kulshreshtha, a teacher of zoology, expects
education policy planners to give due consideration to the kinds
of diversity-morphological, ecological, political, economical,
linguistic, gender-specific, etc., so that it may lead to
harmonious and cordial coexistence of different social
formations.
UGC Chairman Hari
Gautam and A.S. Desai, a former chairperson of the UGC, stress
the need for making education a means for achieving individual
motivation, ethical uplift, moral sublimity, personal integrity
and integrated development of personality through a synthesis of
the studies of the science and liberal arts.
Though these
papers invariably remind us that most of these ideas have been
repeatedly put forth by a large number of commissions and
committees formed from time to time, it is a harsh reality that
recommendations of such bodies are almost invariably placed on
the dusty shelves and then forgotten. It is hoped that some of
the remedies suggested in these articles e.g. abolition of
multiple entrance test, mushroom growth of institutions of
higher learning without proper infrastructure and inculcation of
ethical and moral values among students will not suffer from
similar neglect.
|