Thursday,
May 16, 2002, Chandigarh, India
|
Against shifting local courts Apropos of your news item, “Plan to shift local courts to cantt”, you have mentioned that various political leaders, organisations and advocates are demanding to bring back the local court for the past several years. This is factually wrong. Except a few lawyers, majority are working comfortably at the Sessions Court compound. None of the public members has got any grievance. For the last 12 years the work is going on smoothly. Earlier, the work at Cantt Court used to start almost after lunch because majority of lawyers used to be busy at the Session Court and cases used to be delayed. Now lower court work as well as Appellate Court work runs side by side because all lawyers are available in one complex at Sessions Court, and there is no problem of availability of lawyers. Moreover, at Ambala City a big judicial complex is going to be completed in about six months having the capacity to accommodate not less than 30 courts. Hence there is no point in establishing a mini-complex at Ambala Cantt. When the people from Naraingarh and beyond are coming to Ambala City after completing a big distance of 30/40 km, the 6-km distance between Ambala City and Cantt is no distance when local service is fully available. If further enquiry is required then a spot survey may be done by the media to know the truth. Vested interests of a few people should not prevail upon the majority. The move, if any, must be dropped and all the courts should be consolidated in the newly built judicial complex at Ambala City. M.G. BAGGA, Ambala Cantt |
|
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |