Tuesday, April 2, 2002, Chandigarh, India
|
|
PUDA fails to comply with orders SAS Nagar, April 1 A Superintending Engineer, after have been reverted to the post of a Divisional Engineer (Public Health), has again being promoted as Superintending Engineer. Incidentally, the decision to promote him was taken at a recent meeting of the authority when officials announced review of absorptions of other officials done at the PUDA meeting held on December 22, 2001. Sources in the Housing and Urban Development Department said the technocrat, Mr Rajiv Moudgil, had been reverted to his original post after an official of the reserved category, Mr Tarlochan Singh, went to the Minorities Commission staking claim for the post of the Superintending Engineer (Public Health). Against two posts of Superintending Engineer (Public Health), there are now three Superintending Engineers. Mr Moudgil has been reinstated as Superintending Engineer (Civil) till a vacancy in the Public Health cadre arose. The authority has decided that till the creation of the post of Superintending Engineer, the technocrat would draw his salary against a vacant post of Divisional Engineer (Public Health) by clubbing it with vacant post of Sub-divisional Engineer (Public Health). The PUDA Engineers Association has already taken up the matter with the Housing and Urban Development Minister. The minister, Mr Ragunath Sahai Puri, was not available for comments. Alleging the appointment as illegal, the association said the rules and regulations were thrown to winds to appoint the technocrat in PUDA. Conditions like two years’ probation period and passing of the departmental examination were waived under political pressure, allege members of the association. It may be mentioned that Mr Moudgil had gone to the Punjab and Haryana High Court against his reversion. While disposing of a writ petition filed by Mr Moudgil on February 28, 2002, a division Bench consisting of Mr Justice R.L. Anand and Mr Justice Amar Dutt, observed “ Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, we dispose of this writ petition at this juncture by giving direction to the Chief Administrator to consider the writ petition as representation of the petitioner and take a fresh decision whether he has superiority over Mr Tarlochan Singh”. When contacted, Mr Moudgil said the previous government had reverted him without giving him any opportunity. He said his reversion just one day before the modal code of conduct for the Assembly elections became effective was done due to some political vendetta. “I was promoted as SE in June, 2000 and was reverted after one-and-a-half years later. “I have been reinstated at the authority meeting as per the rules”, said Mr Moudgil. Already a case challenging the appointment of Mr Moudgil as DE (Public Health) is pending before the high
court. The case is to be heard on April 24, 2002. Several technocrats in the department lament that the promotion will set a bad precedent. Meanwhile, it is learnt that the reinstated technocrat was likely to be adjusted as a Superintending Engineer at SAS
Nagar. |
Admn keen on retaining repatriated power officials Chandigarh, April 1 Both the officials, the Superintending Engineer, Electricity Operations, Mr J.N. Sachdeva and the Additional Superintending Engineer, Mr Ajit Singh Gulati, have asked the Administration to be relieved. Their respective files have been moved and cleared for repatriation The Administration fears that sending away these two senior men in one go and that two without replacements will create problems with summer setting in. Sources said a section of senior officials of the Administration was of the opinion that, both, or at least one of them, should be retained till a competent replacement was brought in their places. Or alternatively relieve the duo in phases with one of them going back first and the next one was relieved in six to eight months later. Interestingly, both Mr Sachdeva and Mr Gulati have got good postings in Punjab thus are keen on going back. Mr Sachdeva has been posted as the Chief Engineer, Amritsar, which is considered a prestigious posting in the Punjab State Electricity Board circles. It is a crucial career move which very few refuse as the area under command comprise even adjoining districts and at least seven SE-level officials report to the Chief Engineer, Amritsar. As providing of power in border villages has been announced by the Punjab CM, the post will be more in focus and bring him in line for further promotions. Mr Gulati would go as the Director of Ranjit Sagar Dam phase. If both were sent back the UT would be left with only two full fledged SEs. Mr V.P. Dhingra and Mr S.K. Mehtani. The other SE, Mr Krishanjit is on current duty charge (CDC). Mr Mehtani is already looking after the additional work given to him after Mr V.K. Bhardawaj , SE, Construction circle, was selected Chief Engineer Municipal Corporation. The Administration needs at least six SE-level officials to run the show. |
SI
suspended Chandigarh, April 1 Meanwhile, Inspector Prem Lal Chauhan has been
posted as in charge of the crime branch in place of Inspector J.S.
Cheema, who was suspended last month following a case of corruption
registered against him by the CBI. |
MC asks depts to send expenditure needs Chandigarh, April 1 The department heads have been asked to send back the money left unspent by a cheque in the name of the Municipal Commissioner, Chandigarh. With the financial year having closed yesterday, the departments are required to prepare their accounts of expenditure and budget allocation. The expenditure in excess would only be approved with a prior permission of the Commissioner, sources said. |
MC panel chiefs asked to call meetings Chandigarh, April 1 These committees of the corporation have not been working since the Congress Mayor, Mr Rajkumar Goel, had assumed charge in a BJP-dominated House. In a letter, Ms Joshi has asked them to hold meetings within a week of receipt of the letters. The Mayor is also planning to write letters to the Congress councillors for sending their agenda items to be included in the fiscal 2002-2003 year. Only one Congress Councillor, Ms Pushpa Sharma, had sent her developmental agenda items by the end of the fiscal 2001-2002 against the appeal of the Mayor earlier. The Mayor is also planning to reverse the process of developmental planning at the committee-level by suggesting that the committees would propose developmental works and their priorities instead of the officials doing so and getting approval of committees later. She plans to call a meeting of councillors in this regard to explain the development strategy to party councillors. |
Recovery case to come up today Chandigarh, April 1 In view of the situation, those responsible for the recovery of dues for 27 months from 46 operators are likely to present the case before the Additional Municipal Commissioner, Mr Ashok Vashishth, tomorrow for an action against defaulters. However, 41 operators have paid the corporation Rs 1.08 lakh with Mark Twlly company paying the highest amount of Rs 20,000, sources said here today. The corporation had issued notices to 87 operators recently after winning a court case against cable operators to start recovery. |
MC forms panel for complaints Chandigarh, April 1 The committee was constituted by the Municipal Commissioner, Mr M. P. Singh. The MC Joint Commissioner, Mr D. S. Saroya, will be co-chairman-cum convener of the committee, Councillor, Ms Amar Kulwant Singh, Senior Assistants of the MC, Ms Devinder Kaur and Shashi Bala, are other members of the committee. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |