Friday,
January 5, 2001, Chandigarh, India |
|
Changed
pattern of paper flayed MANDI GOBINDGARH,
Jan 4 — Great resentment is being expressed over the decision of the Punjab School Education Board to eliminate questions of History of Punjab from the question papers of Class X in the coming examinations. The reason being put forward is that the question papers cannot be supplied this time. Students said this was a great injustice as students had been taught History of Punjab till December, 1999. Mr S.P. Goel, president of Primary Schools Organisation of Amloh Zone had approached the Punjab School Education Board authorities not to eliminate History of Punjab, altogether and set some questions as alternatives or give the students more choice, otherwise the board would have to announce grace marks to bring down the number of failures. |
HC order on commercial
properties CHANDIGARH,
Jan 4 — In a landmark judgement the Punjab and Haryana High Court yesterday ruled that a tenant occupying commercial premises will have to vacate it , if the owner wishes to use the same for his personal need. Mr Justice R.L. Anand handed down this 23-page judgement on a petition filed by Mr Rakesh Vij, a respondent tenant of SCF No. 8, Sector 16, against Dr Raminder Pal Singh and challenging the order of the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, under Section 13 of the Rent Restrictions Act as extension of Urban Area Chandigarh for ejectment of the respondent from the SCF. Dr Raminder Pal Singh Sethi has filed the petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act 1949 as extended to the Urban Area of Chandigarh against the respondent tenant, Mr O.P. Vij, seeking ejectment of the latter from the SCF on the plea that the premises was required by him for personal use and occupation. It is mandatory that residential premises can be got vacated when owner desires to reside in the same and the High Court has extended this law to the commercial premises also. Mr Justice Anand observed, “In nut shell, I have tried to show through this order that the Amending Act of 1982 does not require any separate repealing by the Legislature or by the High Court or by the Supreme Court. It has already lost its value and importance after passing of the judgement in Harbilas’s case from which there is no escape for us”. Mr Justice Anand directed the tenant to hand over the possession of the premises to the owner within two months. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 120 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |