Tuesday, October 24, 2000, Chandigarh, India
|
Kargil relief: difficult questions THE patriotic fervour shown by our countrymen during the Kargil crisis was unparalleled. It was attributable to the remarkable role played by the media, especially TV, in bringing out the supreme sacrifices our soldiers had made. Its role in prompting the people to make generous donations for the rehabilitation of the disabled and the war widows was no less significant. It is, however, unfortunate that the administration has not been able to handle the huge amount collected through donations with transparency. There has been a number of reports that the money had been misused, embezzled and diverted to other funds. An amount of Rs 200 crore from this donated money has been diverted to the Prime Minister’s Fund, but no clarification on this has been given by the government. A large number of our disabled soldiers and dependants of the martyrs of the previous operations are running from pillar to post for rehabilitation. The homage to the martyrs is not to lay wreaths on their mortal remains but to give a respectable living to their wives and children. Lt Col JAGJIT SINGH MAND (retd) |
|
Pension woes THIS
refers to the news in The Tribune (Oct 11) under the heading “Pensioners
sore with Punjab government.” The Punjab government should
immediately accept at least those demands which the Centre has already
conceded. One such demand that at least 50 per cent pension of the minimum of the revised grade of the post held at the time of retirement deserves special attention. I gave in writing during the interview with the Pay Commission that a seniormost retired Chief Engineer was getting less pension than the newly retired SDOs due to unrealistic and faulty fixation formula. Only partial correction has been done. Even now practically all the Chief Engineers who retired before 1.1.96, the date of revision of pay scales, are getting less pensions than the new S.E.s (Superintending Engineers) who retired after 1.1.96. This is unjustified that seniors in rank and service should be given less pension than juniors. After all, this revision of pay scales is to compensate for inflation and the price rise and certainly not because those retiring after 1.1.96 are better qualified and more efficient. The Haryana and Himachal governments have adopted it. Why is the Punjab government lagging behind? ANAND
PRAKASH |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 120 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |