Sunday, July 9, 2000, Chandigarh, India
|
Working towards sustainable agriculture
by Harihar Swarup |
|
Ahmed Patel ko gussa kyon
aaya?
|
Working towards sustainable agriculture The name of Punjab-born agriculture scientist, Dr Gurdev S. Khush, has become synonymous with rice. His pioneering work at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines, since 1967, has led to the development of over 300 high-yielding, disease- and insect-resistant, early-maturing rice varieties. The rice varieties developed under his leadership are now planted on about 60 per cent of the world’s rice land. One of his varieties, IR-36, became the most widely grown variety of any crop, worldwide, with a sweep of 11 million hectares of land in 1980s. As a distinguished scientist, Dr Khush has trained numerous rice breeders. He has been honoured with several awards and elected to some of the world’s most prestigious academies, besides being awarded the Doctorate of Science (Honoris Causa) by several universities. He has written books and is on the editorial board of several research journals. The latest honour bestowed on him was in May when he was awarded the Wolf Prize, Israel’s equivalent of the Nobel, by that country’s President, Erez Weizman, at a special ceremony at Knesset (Parliament). The award carries a citation and $100,000. Though away from “home” for over 40 years now, Dr Khush sometimes does think of homecoming. For the past 35 years or so he has been visiting Punjab at least once, and at times even twice, every year. He belongs to Rurkee, in Jalandhar, where he was born on August 22, 1935. Having
done his B.Sc in Agriculture from Panjab University, Chandigarh, he
went to the USA for his PhD in genetics at the University of
California. Having initially worked on tomatoes, he eventually shifted
to rice and joined the IRRI, Philippines, in 1967. He was promoted as
Principal Scientist (Plant Breeding)—his present post—in 1986, a
distinction conferred on only seven of more than 600 scientists who
are either working now or who have worked at the IRRI in the past.
|
Dr Khush is literally a globetrotter. Since May, when The Tribune first congratulated him for the Wolf Prize and requested him for an interview, he has been constantly hopping from one country to another. Despite his international engagements, he readily agreed to answer any questions. From what he has to say on Indian agriculture, its education and research programmes in general to what direction Punjab must follow one can see his deep concern and commitment to the needs and problems of his native place. The interview brought out his strong view that India should have “state-specific” policies on agriculture, depending on the stage of development. He does not consider it appropriate for all states to follow a standard guideline for agriculture developed by policy makers at Delhi. Punjab agriculture, he says, is at a crossroads. It needs major overhaul to remain profitable. He goes on to suggest diversification with stress on soybean, maize and reintroduction of cotton. He favours reduction in the cost of cultivation per unit as well as enlarging the size of farms, mechanisation of agronomic operations and precision farming when it comes to the application of fertilisers or the use of scarce resources like water. Further, he suggests reducing post-harvest losses, use of crop by-products and vertical integration of the farm industry (production, processing and trade being done by the same farm). His major stress being that agriculture in Punjab and elsewhere has to be competitive, quality-based and efficient. International markets have to be explored and exploited for sustainable agriculture. There is a need to re-orient research in agricultural universities, depending on the location of each. For Punjab, he recommends a huge reduction in the area under rice cultivation. He has dubbed the supply of “free” power to the agriculture sector as “short-sighted and suicidal.” This blocks the inflow of funds and aid from international financial institutions. Unless the quality of farm produce and products is improved, India will not be able to compete in the international markets because other countries are health-conscious and will invoke phyto-sanitary regulations. Dr Khush wants the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, to introduce a golden handshake scheme to reduce over-staffing and also the retrain existing staff. The PAU has to lay stress on training managers for agro-industries, agro-processing and generate value addition. Rather than train agronomists, it should impart training in information technology, food processing, agricultural engineering, agri-business management, etc. Those who have reaped benefits of agricultural research in the past should be taxed and the money thus collected spent on future research. Besides disclosing what was new in the pipeline in rice research at the IRRI, Dr Khush has also made a telling comment on what Punjab requires: “The crying need of Punjab is an enlightened political leadership which should aim at generating resources for development projects, attracting investment in agro and hi-tech industries, and overhauling the education system to produce experts in information technology with managerial talent. The surplus generated in agriculture must be invested in rural industry.” Dr Khush even consulted economist Dr Mahabub Hossain at the IRRI to answer some of the questions as these pertained to policy and planning. But he stresses on education of women and the building a strong infrastructure for sustainable agriculture. If women were given more jobs outside their homes, the population problem would be taken care of. There is a strong co-relation between the reduction in fertility rate and the level of education, particularly of women. Success in population comes with socio-economic development, particularly through female education and employment. The rice breeder has cautioned that India must adopt a cautious policy towards the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and should not go in for complete liberalisation. The approach has to be on a case-to-case basis with proper appraisal and assessment. Dr Khush favours a phased reduction in subsidies to agriculture with money saved being ploughed back for infrastructure development. The following are excerpts from an interview via the Internet: The Green Revolution and Punjab are synonymous. The former has reached a plateau. Where do we go from here? Punjab must exploit international markets with emphasis on value-addition, such as superior grain quality, differentiation and standardisation of products through packaging, quality assurance for gaining consumer trust, etc. The state also needs to explore avenues to reduce the cost of production per unit of output to be competitive in international markets. What is your perception of agriculture in Punjab as of today? Could you identify the fault-lines? What steps would you suggest to remedy/remove them and improve the economic condition of farmers? Punjab’s agriculture is at a crossroads. It needs major overhauling to remain profitable. Efforts should be made to enlarge farm sizes and improve efficiency of operations by total mechanisation and the introduction of precision farming techniques as practiced in developed countries. For example, use GIS for determining the doses of fertiliser need in specific situations. Punjab uses 70-80 person days of labour per hectare because of the availability of cheap labour from other states. The Thailand experience shows it could be reduced by 20 person days through the mechanisation of all farm operations. This will help increase efficiency and reduce the unit cost of production. There should also be an emphasis on reducing post-harvest losses, utilisation of crop by-products, and a move towards vertical integration of the farm industry (the concept of production, processing and trade being done by the same farm). The Punjab Agricultural University (PAU) has done well. Today, it needs a major leap forward. As an administrator, educationist, scientist and extension worker, what direction or priorities would you suggest to rejuvenate it in view of its contribution to Punjab’s socio-economic development? The university
is over-staffed. A very large proportion of the budget goes into
salaries and very little is left for the operations. Efforts should be
made to reduce the staff through innovative approaches such as golden
handshake and retraining.
|
Profile WITHIN a year, if all goes well, the first cancer patient will be injected with two new drugs that can kill any type of cancer cells with no obvious side-effects. Also, it may be possible to create drugs to suit a patient’s genetic profile enabling medical science to cure diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and heart problems. This remarkable breakthrough is attributed to Dr J. Craig Venter and his colleagues working with him in the Human Genome Project and Celera Genomics, a private US company. Human life is controlled by chemical codes. The codes are contained in spiral-shaped DNA. The code inside one human cell contains 50,000 to 1000,000 instructions, called genes, and each one controls a different characteristic. A weekly magazine has aptly described this phenomenon as “the book of life”. Recalling the early days of the genome project, Dr Venter says: “It’s like a very big jigsaw puzzle, with hundreds of thousands to millions of pieces. Each of these genomes, these millions of base pairs of genetic code, is the recorded history of life. And, we haven’t tapped 1 per cent of the potential of this information”. In a lecture delivered two years back, he gave an idea of the working of the giant project. “We had three massive parallel super-computers. But even with those computers, they had to run 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and still could not keep up with the load. The whole place is a giant distribution network with internal and external websites. We have 40 people here, out of a total of 150, working in so-called bioinformatics, just trying to make sense of the biology.” He claims that “ once we get the genome sequence, we will just run it through a personal computer and find all the genes”. Dr Venter, now in his early fifties, is also known to be a intuitive thinker and trying to find out “what is life”. Dr Venter plans to map the human DNA by the year 2001 and the first phase of his human genome project is in the final stages. Known to be brilliant and, at the same time orthodox, Dr Venter declined to appear in any of the examinations at the high school level but when he decided to take the tests, he was just superb. The scene of his early education had been California and he rose from strength to strength. At the young age of 21, he had worked in a jam-packed hospital in Vietnam in 1967 where he handled men, gasping for survival with badly infected and bleeding wounds. Working almost round the clock in the over-crowded hospital, he decided to know more about the human body he remained firm in his resolve. Time moved fast. Dr Venter with the resolution of finding more about human life embedded in his heart returned to the USA and plunged into the study of biochemistry. It took him six years to complete BA and Ph.D. In the later half of the seventies, he devoted all his time to medical research. In the early eighties he was working with the US National Institute of Health (NIH) which is, at present is a prime supporter of HGP (Human Genes Project). Success came subsequently when intense research enabled him to locate certain genes. His invention is the greatest since the discovery of the atomic bomb and antibiotics and in the years to come may change the style and course of human life. Among those who helped Dr Venter in his project is 80-year-old Nobel Laureate James Watson. A survey conducted by CNN and Time magazine reveals that as many as 47 per cent, among those interviewed, were against developing technology to map the genome and 41 per cent had no objection to such decoding. Their percentage rose 61 when asked if they had access to their genetic code, would they want to know what diseases they were predisposed to get ? Thirtyfive per cent were even against this. An overwhelming 75 per cent “no” in reply to another question-would they like their health insurer to know about their genetic code-while 22 per cent had no objection. The percentage rose to 84 when asked if they would want the government to know about their genetic code. |
Delhi durbar THAT is the question that is on the lips of most Congress workers after AICC Treasurer Ahmed Patel quit the post protesting against the ‘jehad’ (as he called it) against him by a faction of the party in his home State of Gujarat.“Ahmedbhai”, as he is known in the party, was one of the most popular figures in the AICC. Always courteous, even to strangers, his popularity could be gauged from the fact that he polled the maximum number of votes when the 1,100-strong AICC delegates elected nine members to the Congress Working Committee. In fact, Ahmedbhai has the unique distinction of working with successive Congress Presidents since Rajiv Gandhi. Although his relations with P.V. Narasimha Rao were not the best, he continued to be the party’s General Secretary. When Rao handpicked Treasurer Sitaram Kesri to succeed him as party chief, the latter nominated Patel to his post. What is baffling the party workers and leaders alike is the fact that the media-shy Ahmed Patel released copies of his letter to the Congress President to the press. Apparently, Patel was upset that his earlier communication to Sonia Gandhi on being targeted by a faction of the Gujarat Congress went unanswered. Frustrated he resorted to the unusual move which eventually proved to be his undoing. Mrs Gandhi was upset that Patel had released the letter which he had sent to her through a courier earlier that day and when a meeting was fixed the same evening, he made his letter public by that afternoon. The only option available was that either Patel withdrew his resignation and announce it or out he goes. Of course, a whispering campaign has been set in motion by a section that Patel was snubbed because he was seen as a possible challenger after Pilot. Considering that Patel at one time was a confidant of 10, Janpath, there are a few takers for this theory. When a T A officer stumped the PM Most people are aware of the ready wit of Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and his oratorial skills but recently a Territorial Army Officer-cum-Congress politician beat him at it. AICC Secretary Sudhir Sawant, who was promoted as Colonel, had done a stint during the Kargil war. He had made a special request to the government to give him some duty, an offer which was accepted. He recently told Mr Vajpayee that despite being a Kargil martyr he was a loser. The Prime Minister was apparently taken aback as the former Congress MP seemed normal otherwise. Prodded further Col Sawant said in jest that while the NDA benefited from the Kargil war he lost the last general elections as he was busy serving the nation when contestants were doing the rounds of their constituency. Shouting from the top of the tower Shouting atop the rooftop doesn’t necessarily mean that you are heard. It is a different matter that you will definitely get attention. Putting this into practice has been none other than Municipal Councillor Asif Mohammad Khan in the capital. Unhappy over the demolition drive launched by the municipal authorities in his area of influence, the Councillor, armed with kerosene and wood, climbed atop a 200 feet telephone tower and threatened to set himself on fire if he was not heard by the authorities. Incidentally, this was not the first time that Khan was resorting to such antics. In 1998, he had climbed a tower in South Delhi to protest against the errant electricity supply in the capital. Like the last time, he was persuaded, after almost eight hours, to get down by the local police and Delhi Fire Service officials. On his part, Khan later admitted that he knew that his antics would not help prevent the demolition. “I just wanted to be heard by the police”, he said. Innovation is the key Minister of State for External Affairs Ajit Panja of Trinamool Congress is a senior leader who was a Minister with independent charge in the Narasimha Rao Council of Ministers. Yet, as he cannot be given an equal rank to the Trinamool Congress President Mamata Banerjee, he continues as a MoS. Even though he is in the MEA, the Minister cannot go abroad since there is clear demarcation as to the countries a MoS can visit. On top of it, most of the nations where the Minister can visit have already received a former MoS during the past one year before being shifted to another Ministry. It appears, the MEA has now planned another route to enable the Minister travel to countries. Instead of approaching the host nations, they are generating invitations from Indian communities abroad. IST works even in Pakistan Indian Standard Time (IST) has also another popular meaning among the people which goes “Indian Stretchable Time”. But what came as a surprise was that this second saying is also applicable in Pakistan. On a recent visit to Pakistan for the South Asian media conference it dawned that probably Pakistan was far ahead on this even than the Indians. The reception where the General spoke almost became a non-starter as he was nowhere in sight for more than two hours from the time it was scheduled to start. The large gathering of media personalities from South Asia and the guests waited almost endlessly for the CEO to arrive. Some even thought of leaving when a word went around that the General might not even turn up. And when he did, it was past 9.30 pm prompting a wag to comment that the General, a military man, a man of discipline had beaten even the Indian politicians hollow in making people wait. The woman behind Musharraf Begum Musharraf is the quintessential woman behind Pakistan’s Chief Executive Officer, Gen Pervez Musharraf. Elegantly attired and carrying herself with grace as a typical army officer’s wife, she was all ears when her husband indulged in some unabashed India bashing during the concluding session of the South Asia media conference organised by the Jung group of newspapers in Islamabad on July 2. An unbudging Gen Musharraf made it clear that if India did not want to talk to him then so be it. It was apparent that in his opinion if Indo-Pak ties had reached a point of no return, it was certainly not his doing as he had made the necessary overtures. If the stalled dialogue is to be started, India has to take the lead without setting pre-conditions. If the questions posed by the battery of Indian mediapersons were straight from the hip and provocative, Gen Musharraf cut out the niceties in responding to them. At times, there was no doubt that Gen Musharraf was at his blunt, blustery self. The question is does that style help in diplomacy and is it in keeping with the “mehmaan nawazi” of the subcontinent. No sooner that he finished his two-hour interface with mediapersons especially from India and returned to his seat, Begum Musharraf whispered something into his ear. The General promptly returned to the mike and tendered an apology. He said it was not his intention to hurt anyone’s susceptibilities. That carried the long night to some extent but most felt that Gen Musharraf had ruined the carefully planned public relations exercise. A wag summed up the situation by saying “diplomatese is not beating about the bush but making your presence felt to no avail”. (Contributed by TRR, T.V. Lakshminarayan, K.V. Prasad, Girja Shankar Kaura and P N Andley). |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 120 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |