C O M P E N D I U M Tuesday, November 16, 1999 |
weather spotlight today's calendar |
CHANDIGARH, Nov 15 The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II has imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on the Department of Telecommunication and directed it to refund the excess bill amount to Mr Balbir Singh Makol, a Mani Majra resident, for not shifting his phone for five years. The complainant argued that in May, 1991, he applied to the department to shift his phone from Sector 23 to Motor Market Complex, Mani Majra. The latter replied in July, 1991, that the area was technically non-feasible and put his request on serial number 39. The subscriber alleged that two employees of the department had demanded Rs 500 for early shifting, but as he refused, the employees said he would have to wait for years for shifting of his telephone. In January, 1992, he approached the department and was told that his telephone had been disconnected for non-payment of bill of June, 1991. After much correspondence and receiving a number of bills, the connection had been shifted and revived on September 6,1995. But now he did not receive the bills in spite of a number of letters to the department and ultimately his telephone was disconnected without any prior notice. On this, the complainant claimed a compensation of Rs 3 lakh for loss of business and Rs 5,000 towards costs of complaint. In the answer to the complaint, the department has admitted the introductory facts but denied the material averments, adding that the area to which the telephone was required to be shifted was technically non-feasible even as a couple of advice notices had been issued. The telephone was shifted and installed on September 6, 1995, and on September 27, the subscriber was asked to clear the pending bill and on October 9, 1996, the telephone was closed. The forum felt that no blame could be put on the department for delay in shifting the phone up to January, 1992, for the area was not feasible and delay beyond that could be attributed to deficiency in service on the part of the department which deprived the complainant of use of phone for more than three-and-a-half years with no justifiable reasons. Allowing the complaint, the forum said the complainant had to be compensated for harassment, costs of the case for deficiency occurred between February, 1992, to September, 1995, and from October, 1996, to February, 1998, a total of five years of undue harassment. The forum, in addition
to imposing a fine of Rs 25,000 on the department,
directed the latter to refund the excess amount paid by
complainant along with interest at the rate of 12 per
cent per annum from the date of payment till refund. HUDA ordered to refund deposit PANCHKULA, Nov 15 The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum ordered the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) to refund Rs 57,525 deposited by Mr Ashok Kumar Goyal, a resident of Panchkula, along with interest of 10 per cent per annum and pay Rs 1,000 towards cost of proceedings. The complaint stated that a plot in Sonepat, initially allotted to Mr Sanjay Kumar Jain, was subsequently transferred to his name for a tentative price of Rs 2,30,00 out of which the complainant had already paid Rs 57,525 towards the price of the plot. Mr Goyal alleged that he had not been given possession of the plot for which he sent registered letters to HUDA. In fact, HUDA had failed to give him possession of the plot even after a lapse of more than six years from the date of allotment of the plot. In its reply, HUDA stated that though the complainant had paid Rs 57,525 yet the plot in question had been resumed since the authority had received no request from Mr Sanjay Kumar Jain for possession and he was, further, not in a position to take possession on account of non-payment of instalments for which he was served a number of notices. The bench, comprising Mr R.C. Taneja and Mr B.S. Badhran, observed that HUDA had not been able to deliver possession of the plot after due development and as such, the resumption of plot without offer of possession had no meaning. Further, they added that
HUDA had offered the plots to the general public in
March, 1991, and actually allotted the same in July,
1991. However, possession of plots had not been offered
even after eight years had passed which amounted to gross
deficiency of service. While stating that HUDA should not
float any schemes till the development was complete and
was in a position to offer possession of plots to
allottees within a reasonable time-frame. |
CHANDIGARH, Nov 15 Sacred Heart School, Sector 26, cornered glory in the UT inter-school lawn tennis tournament being played at Lake Club courts, Sector 6, here today. Sacred Heart School emerged winners in under-17 and under-19 sections and sailed into last four. In under-19 section, Sacred Heart got the better of Government Model Senior Secondary School, Sector 16, 2-0 (Neha b J. Sidhu 6-0, 6-0, Mallika Malhotra b Khushleen 6-4, 6-3). In another match in under-17 section, Sacred Heart outplayed Carmel Convent School, Sector 9, 2-0 (Simer b Harpreet Neelu 6-0, 6-0, Isha b Shaira (6-4, 6-0). In an under-17 match, Government Model Senior Secondary School, Sector 10, downed Shishu Niketan-22 2-0 (Shaleen Chauhan b Kamana 6-0, 6-0, Prabhleen Chauhan b Ruhi 6-2, 6-0). Other results: under-14 GMHS-28 b Sacred Heart-26 2-1 (Amanpreet Kaur b Neha Munshi 6-3, 6-1, Pallavi b Nibha 6-4, 7-5; doubles: Amanpreet and Pallavi b Nibha and Neha Munshi 6-3, 6-4); Carmel-9 b DAVPS-8 2-0 (Amarpreet Shallu b Misha 6-0, 6-0, Wanjeet Bhans b Anchal 6-0, 6-0). Inter-school karate: Sumati and Harpreet bagged gold medal in the below 45 kg and below 50 kg categories, respectively, in under-19 girls section in the UT inter-school karate championship at Shivalik Public School, Sector 41. Results: boys under-14: Vicky 1, Arun 2, Gagandeep 3; under-19 girls: below 45 kg: Sumati 1, Rekha 2, Anjali 3; under-19 girls: below 50 kg: Harpreet Kaur 1, Kavita 2, Anju 3. DAV-8 win: DAV Senior Secondary School, Sector 8, defeated Government High School, Kajheri by 249 runs in the UT inter-school cricket tournament for under-16 at DAVSSS-8. Brief scores: DAVSSS-8: 286 for 1 in 20 overs (Akashdeep 112 n.o., Rajat Bhatia 100); GHS, Kajheri: 27 all out (Kshitij 7 for 4, Vikram Rajbir Singh 3 for 16). GMSSS-37 first: The
girls team of Government Model Senior Secondary School,
Sector 37, got first position in the under-19 section of
the UT inter-school softball tournament held at
Government Model Senior Secondary School, Sector 37, as
per the press release issued by the winner school. Bansi wins 10,000 m race CHANDIGARH, Nov 15 Bansi Lal of Himachal Sector won the marathon 10,000 metres on the second day of the 19th Indo-Tibetan Border Police inter-sector athletics meet being held at Basic Training Centre, Bhanu, near Panchkula, here today. After 10,000 metres of lap race, Bansi surged ahead to win the race from Satyapal Singh of Garhwal and Arun Lal of Jammu and Kashmir. Ramesh Kumar from Training Centre bagged gold medal in hammer while Rattan Chand and Surinder Singh from Himachal sector secured second and third position, respectively. Results: 10,000 m: Bansi Lal 1, Satya Pal 2, Arun Pal 3; hammer throw: Ramesh Kumar 1, Rattan Chand 2, Surinder Singh 3; 400 m hurdles: Kundan Singh 1, Tejbir Singh 2, Mukesh Kumar 3; 200 m: Om Prakash 1; Surinder Singh 2, Vishwanathan Sarkar 3; triple jump: John Mathew 1, Devender Singh 2, Bajir Singh 3. Inter-school cricket: Government Model Senior Secondary School Sector 35, and Shivalik Public School, Sector 41, defeated DAV Public School, Sector 8, and Government Model High School, Sector 28, in the UT inter-school cricket tournament for under-14, section at St Johns High School here today. Brief scores: Ist match:
GMSSS-35 (165 for 8 in 20 overs (Siddharth 54, Varun 36,
Amikul 15, Rishu 5 for 14) DAVPS-8 85 all out in 18.1
overs (Raghav 40, Manvinder 12, Randeep 5 for 20, Mohit 2
for 5, Siddharth 2 for 15); IInd match: SPS-41:174 for 7
in 20 overs (Gaurav Kumar 49, Ankush 38, Anil 11, Nitin 2
for 17, Ripudaman 2 for 25) GMHS-28:141 all out in 19
overs (Charanjit 67, Saurav 14, Gaurav Gupta 3 for 14,
Harjinder 2 for 20). |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | | Editorial | Business | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |