The ugly face
of bigamy
REETA SHARMA did well to focus
readers attention on a grave social malady in the
article "The ugly face of bigamy" (February 6).
With the decline of
morality, right conduct and discipline, various evils
have crept into our society. We have broken loose from
our great cultural moorings. It is distressing to note
that bigamy cases have a cancerous growth.
We must laud and actively
support the efforts of social organisations like the
Punjab Istri Sabha and social activists like Mrs S.
Grewal who are devoted to the cause of women. Aggrieved
women must be given support in their bold fight against
this humiliation.
By preserving the sanctity
of marriage and remaining faithful to ones spouse,
one can find real and lasting happiness, whereas
unnatural relations outside marriage open the flood gates
to all sorts of complications and miseries, as revealed
in certain T.V. serials being telecast at present.
S.K. SHARMA
Hoshiarpur
II
The writer has drawn
attention towards an emerging social and marital malaise.
There are cases of bigamy even in small towns. Husbands
take undue advantage of their wives who are economically
dependent on them.
I know from personal
experience that bigamists enjoy full respect in society;
they are counted among the gentry. Some of the bigamists
pose to be deeply religious too! Some are even in
government and semi-government service.
The plight of the victim
of bigamy is pitiable. Even her children are alienated
from her in most cases. If she ever moves a court, there
is no guarantee that she would be able to get her husband
back!
The law should be suitably
amended in this era of the empowerment of women. Bigamy
must declared a cognizable offence, where police and
courts are free to take suo motu action against the
bigamist and the second wife must also be awarded
suitable punishment. Some persons misuse the Islamic law
to hoodwink the court. They declare that they have
embraced Islam, whereas in effect they have not. This
misuse of a religious provision should also not go
unchallenged. The hypocrites must be exposed.
SURENDRA
AJNAT
Banga
Never
say die
This refers to Taru Bahl
thought-provoking article "Never say die"
(January 23). Significantly, the overall suicide rate is
increasing in our society.
Although suicide appears
to be a uniquely personal and private act, but in reality
it is not so, because its causes lie in the nature of our
social set-up. In 1897, Eurile Durkheim, an eminent
French Sociologist, in his famous work Suicide wrote:
"Suicide is not simply an individual act but a
product of social forces external to the individual as
such its causes are to be found in society rather than in
individual. Suicide varies inversely with the degree of
integration of the social groups of which the individual
forms a part". The psychoanalytic theory also
recognises that sickness of the individual is ultimately
caused and sustained by the sickness of his civilisation.
Regrettably, very often
suicide is not seen as a social phenomenon in India.
Every case is presumed to be an instance of personality
disorder or an individuals inability to cope in
society. Apart from this, the social structure of our
society is changing rapidly, for example, shifting to
nuclear families, working couples, consumerism, influx of
global culture.
Then what is the way out?
It is very difficult to find a specific answer. However
to some extent, an answer lies in consensus, in a
collective conscience, consisting of common beliefs and
sentiments. Without this consensus or agreement on
fundamental moral issues, it would be impossible to bound
the individuals together to form an integrated social
unit. In essence, society has to do its bit to check the
increasing rate of suicides.
P.L. SETHI
Patiala
Traffic
hazards
This refers to the article
"Pity the poor public" by H. Kishie Singh
(February 6) in which the writer has highlighted the grey
areas of the Indian transport system.
The condition of roads in
most parts of the country is horrendous. This implies
that travelling in India is no longer safe. This problem
is aggravated by government buses, that are in a terrible
state. The government is doing little for the maintenance
of its buses. The people have no choice but to risk their
lives by travelling in these buses. No doubt, road
accidents claim 60,000 lives a year.
The drivers are
irresponsible too. Some do not even possess a driving
licence and many consume liquor while driving. Such
drivers are seldom caught.
The government should pay
more attention towards the maintenance of buses. The
drivers disobeying traffic rules should be strictly dealt
with.
KARAN GUPTA
Chandigarh
Himalayan
messiah?
I was surprised to read
the item captioned "Himalayan messiah" in
Khushwant Singhs weekly column This Above All
(January 16).
In this connection, I
would like to say that about three months back, a
half-hour feature was telecast on Zee India T.V.,
highlighting the activities and hollow claims of Rajesh
Gupta, based on interviews of several persons, including
patients, parents of patients, doctors, pharmacists, the
then Health Minister of Delhi state and officers of the
health departments of Delhi and the Central Government.
This TV feature showed that the so-called Himalayan
messiah was a hoax and his Ayurvedic medicine for the
treatment of epilepsy, contained a well-know allopathic
medicine. Further it was also revealed that enquiries
regarding the claim and the efficacy of treatment of
epilepsy, made by Rajesh Gupta, were being inquired into.
O.P. SHARMA
Faridabad
Origin
of OK
This refers to Amir
Tutejas "Interesting Nonsense" included
in Khushwant Singhs column "This Above
All" (January 23). Tuteja has claimed that the
expression "OK" comes from the initials of a
German named Otto Karause. Of course, it is an addition
to the already existing stock of weird and wonderful
explanations offered for the origin of O.K. But his view
that the expression originated in 1950s cannot be
accepted. Right now, I have a book with me, which was
published in 1945. This book includes OK in it. The
famous Philologist Bloomsbury traces its origin way back
to 1839. In order to lay to rest the hilarious
speculations about the derivation of OK, A.W. Read
published an article in the Saturday Review of Literature
in 1941. According to him, the expression came into
existence with the formation of O.K. Club. This club
comprised a group of people supporting U.S. President
Martin Van Buren for a second term in the White House.
Martin Van Buren was born in Kinderhook and practised law
there in his youth. Later, he came to be nicknamed as Old
Kinderhook. This led to the birth of "Old Kinderhook
Club" or more popularly known as OK Club". Thus
OK became a watchard and was freely used as a slogan
during the U.S. presidential elections of 1840.
Earlier, the most widely
accepted theory was that the letter stood for Orl
Korrect, the facetious early 19th Century American
Phonetic spelling for All Correct. But according to
another tradition, a Red Indian chief named Old Keokuk
used to sign all his treaties with his initials
"OK". Another theory suggested its origin from
Chaktaw Indian "Okeh" which means "so be
it" It seems that these theories will continue to
multiply.
R.R. BHARDWAJ
Ambala
|