Tubewells face threat of
extinction
IT is often said that if the high
yielding varieties of crops are responsible for the Green
Revolution, it is the private tubewells which have made
these varieties a success. The management of these in
Punjab and Haryana is a joint one; farmers are
responsible for their installation and operation whereas
the responsibility for maintaining the level of ground
water at an optimum one by controlling the input and
output of water is that of the State Government. This
level started falling some 20 years ago and has been
continuing since then. Obviously, the output has been
exceeding in input. A stage has now been reached when
these tubewells, numbering over 14 lakh, are facing the
threat of extinction and nobody is sure of their fate
after another 10 years. Even if the rainfall continues to
be as good as in the last decade their ship is sinking
slowly but surely.
This crisis is an
unprecedented one and neither of the States has got any
tested technology to tackle it. Some amount of research
and experimentation is, therefore, unavoidable but the
state governments have not shown any inclination for the
same, so much so that this issue is not even on their
agenda. The tubewell owners being unorganised, have
failed to persuade the governments to discharge their
obligation and this makes this tragedy even more tragic.
The one and only possible
solution is to inject the rainwater and the overflow from
the rice fields into the ground. At present these states
do not have any other surplus water and this one is being
allowed to go waste via drains even in this age of water
shortage.
The doomsday for the
sinking ship can be delayed if:
The tubewell owners can
make use of their votes for persuading the political
parties to use their influence with the government for
setting up at least 50 injecting stations on a pilot
basis before the monsoon in 1999.
The engineers can explain
as to how the desilted water from the drains can be
injected into the ground by gravity and the same can
raise the level of groundwater.
The experts from the
agricultural universities can explain that economically
these tubewells can make the difference between the life
and death of these states.
The financial experts can
explain that funds are no constraint because operational
expenses of these injecting stations are practically nil
and their capital cost will be more than offset by the
savings that will accrue from the reduced subsidy to the
electricity boards.
The environmentalists can
explain that unrestricted decline in the level of
groundwater can cause the brackish water from the
adjoining areas to intrude into the sweet belt and that
such degradation is irreversible.
The Press, the so-called
watchdog of democracy, should cease to remain aloof from
such a burning problem and do its duty of making it a
mass movement like the one it did in the case of onions.
S.P. MALHOTRA
Engineer-in-Chief (retd)
Panchkula
* *
* *
Hunting
frenzy
The news regarding the
killing of a number of hare in a hunting
competition (Jan 24) gave an awfully rude shock. This
sadistic act reminded one of the Roman arenas of yore
where blood-shedding was a favourite pastime. An
aberration of the sick mind, it was a glaring instance of
unbridled urge to perpetrate violence on the mute
animals. No doubt, it was a bloody treat
thrust upon the bewildered gathering. It is a pity that a
docile and sprightly animal which has always been loved
and protected became their target.
Sadism has always been a
dominant factor behind poaching. The killing of antelopes
by Bombay film stars was a glaring instance of
blood-spilling. Again, it was brutality in its vilest
form when the employees of the forest department in Bihar
hunted a blind and starved elephant for a number of days
and finally ensnared and killed him with a live electric
wire. That heinous act was committed just to procure the
tusks of that fugitive elephant! This single act of human
ferocity betrays an ingrained bestiality. It reminds one
of the Central Asian invaders who would push the
elephants from high cliffs and derive pleasure from the
shrieks of severely wounded elephants.
An occasional poacher like
a film star or confirmed poacher has always tried to
wriggle out after committing a crime. In most of the
cases they are let off with mild punishment. For them
there are no cathartic moments. The present wild life
laws are highly provisory in nature. Unfortunately, they
have been incapacitated in such a way that the guarantee
of absolute protection is beyond their purview.
H.M. SAROJ
Chandigarh
* *
* *
|