|
Evolution of carols
By Shiv
Darshanlal Sharma
A CAROL is a kind of song
affiliated with dancing and associated with the season of
the year, especially Christmas. Noel and Weihnachtslied
are its equivalents in French and German, respectively.
The word carol has not remained constant since the 14th
century, when both the things and the name came into
English social life. It has an affinity with the ballad,
the hymn and the folk song, as well as with dancing. The
church and drama have also played a part in its
evolution. The setting up of the crib of the infant
Saviour and the Holy family, said to have been initiated
by St. Francis of Assisi to inculcate the doctrine of the
incarnation, was an early occasion for the singing of
carols both in the church and at home.
The great age of the
English carol was the 15th century, but there is a
nativity carol of about 1350 that has a burden, or
refrain, as follows:
Hound by hound we
schulle ous take.
And joye and blisse schulle we make.
Here is evidence of the
round dance that gave the carol its original character as
a dance song; and here is the recurrent burden that is a
feature fundamental to a carol. The recurrent refrain
fixed the form of the carol until the end of the Middle
Ages. With the coming of the Reformation and the steady
growth of Puritanism, the carols, which had ranged widely
in subject became more gloomy and began to
decline. After the Commonwealth, however, Christmas
festivities were revived and with them came back the
singing of carols.
Carols were published on
jumbo sheets (broadsides), in the later part of the 18th
century. The first modern collections were those of D.
Gilbert Some Ancient Christmas Carols (1822), and
W. Sandys, Christmas Carols, Ancient and Modern (1833).
With the concentration of the carols upon the nativity,
the form became less rigid, although the refrain often
survived, as a relic of the dance. An example is The
Holy and the Ivy, carol in which many strains, pagan
and Christian, are embedded. A definition for modern
times was therefore, framed by Percy Dearmer (in The
Oxford Book of Carols) as follows: Carols are songs
with a religious impulse that are simple, hilarious,
popular and modern. The word modern
expressed, for the ordinary man, the age in which people
lived. This definition does not, however, significantly
demarcate the carol from the Christmas hymn, such as O
Come, All ye Faithful, which was a product of the
18th century. Carol singing is modern in a more literal
sense.
At the time when Gilbert
and Sandys produced their little collections, William
Hone in his Ancient Mysteries Described (1822) predicted
that carols were dying and in a few years would be heard
no more. He spoke too soon, for out of the Oxford
Movement grew a new sympathy with medieval piety, and one
of the curiosities of the 20th century has been an
emotion that finds in the Holy Babe, the rosa mystica,
the Latin interjections of joy, something congenial, such
as was absent from the Victorian ideal of Christmas, as
presented for instance in Dickens A Christmas
Carol. The modern revival dates from 1852 when J.M.N.
Neale received the gift by a copy of Piae cantiones,
a Swedish collection of 1582 A.D. In the following year
he published Carols for Christ-mastide, set to
ancient melodies by the Rev. T. Helmore, M.A.; the words
principally in imitation of the original, by the Rev.
J.M.N. Neale, D.D. The imitation was not always as close
as it might have been Good King Wenceslas, which
he took from Piae cantiones, was a spring carol, tempus
adest floridum; and Christ was born on Christmas day,
was fitted somewhat incongruously to the tune of In
dulci jubilo.
Nevertheless, he started
a movement for bringing back carols into church and home
and open air that has steadily increased in momentum and
range in England and the USA. The development of the
Christmas services of lessons and carols, introduced by
the first Bishop of Truror in 1880, was one of the
movements important aspect.It was first used at
Kings College, Cambridge in 1918 A.D. and in the
following year modified to the form that, through
broadcasting, became familiar in England. In spite of
Puritan traditions, Scotland accepted Christmas carols.
The important collection
of J.Stainer and H.R. Bramely Christmas Carols New and
Old, had appeared in 1871 A.D. and in 1900 A.D. came
the Cowley Carol Book, freshly inspired by a
reversion to medieval mysticism. Several anthologies
appeared in the subsequent six decades, enriched from
still another source, the true folk carol, which was
discovered in the folk-song revival that took place
around 1900 A.D. The Oxford Book of Carols (1928 A.D.)
compiled by Percy Dearmer, R. Vaughan Williams and
Martin Shaw, is comprehensive, in that it draws on all
these sources and on foreign carols and also contains
valuable historical notes.
Wassail songs, mumming
songs, cumulative songs like The Twelve Days of
Christmas belong not to Christmas but to the turn of
the year. These are pagan and magical in origin, but
these have made their way into the corpus of Christmas
carols. Some attempts have been made to reintroduce
Spring and Easter carols, but the popular imagination has
firmly associated carols with Christmastide. Composers
have compiled with the demand for new carols, so that in
the 21st century as in the 15th the carol is a living and
flourishing art.
|