Varsity posts in Punjab
This has reference
to the front-page news item "VCs' powers
curtailed" (The Tribune, Oct 15). The decision of
the Punjab government banning the filling of the posts
both teaching and non-teaching in Punjabi
and GND Universities is unfortunate.
The universities, though
funded by the state government, are autonomous bodies
with their own statutes enacted by the Legislative
Assembly of the state for their self-governance. The ban
imposed by the government on the appointments and
promotions in these universities has no locus standi.
The Punjab Minister of
Higher Education, Mr Manjit Singh is an enlightened
politician and academically well qualified, having done
his postgraduation from the prestigious Calcutta
University. I am afraid he is not being properly advised
by the administrative and legal experts in the
government.
This issue falls within
the perview of the highest governing body of the
university the syndicate. The minister has his
DPI, Education Secretary, Finance Secretary, and three
other syndics nominated by the government. It was not
difficult to carry this item in the syndicate in
accordance with the prevailing rightful procedure,
especially with a view to first undertaking the exercise
of assessment of the work load and the rationalisation of
appointments.
For maintaining healthy
trends for competence in higher education in the state,
perfect understanding between the minister and the
vice-chancellors is a must. This is not difficult to
achieve.
JIWAN TEWARI
Mohali
* *
* *
Polluting
vehicles
The recent crackdown on
15-year-old commercial vehicles in Delhi, though
well-intentioned, is undoubtedly ill-conceived and rather
hastily implemented. Obviously, nobody likes to breathe
polluted air. But how can we wash our hands off the right
of the owners/drivers of these vehicles to earn their
livelihood through honest means.
No one in ones senses will
deny that there is an urgent need to ensure a clean
environment. But surely the polluting vehicles can be
renovated to conform to the required standards by a
little bit of ingenuity and understanding. Then, like in
the West, which we love to emulate in matters not so
important, an MOT test done to certify the roadworthiness
of such vehicles can be used to weed out the polluters.
This will enable these people to continue to earn their
livelihood the way they had been doing. If these still
need to be taken off the road it can be done in a phased
manner without suddenly depriving these people of their
sole source of income.
First an alternative means
of earning must be provided to them, if it is desired
that they do not resort to a life of crime and begging
for alms for their survival.
Will they be granted
interest-free loans to buy new vehicles, so that they can
keep earning to be able to live with dignity? I can't
help but wonder if considerable thought is ever given to
the welfare of an ordinary citizen and his problems by
the wise men who sit in their ivory towers and churn out
judgements to force these down the common man's gullet.
How can it be expected by anyone with some common sense
that a poor man will be able to afford a new vehicle
every 15 years or so?
Later, I understand that
plans are afoot to include other vehicles in the list of
the vehicles that are to be taken off the road. What will
be the fate of the vintage and classic cars? During my
stay in England I came across many an old cars which were
being put to daily use by their proud owners. Can anyone
doubt the concern of the authorities in England to ensure
a breathable future?
VIVEK KHANNA
Panchkula
* *
* *
Turmoil
in Malaysia
I have read with interest
the editorial "Turmoil in Malaysia" (The
Tribune, September 25). It is not correct to say that
Malaysia's premier, Dr Mahathir Mohammed (of Kerala
origin), has been ruling like a dictator all these years.
If Dr Mahathir is hungry
for power like a dictator, as the western media and
former Deputy Premier Anwar Ibrahim portray him to be,
why would he want to sack his deputy whom he brought into
the ruling United Malay National Organisation (UMNO)
making him senior to making leaders. All along the way,
Mr Anwar was protected, to the point that earlier
negative reports on him were disregarded.
Dr Mahathir gave Mr Anwar
all the support even left him to be acting Prime
Minister for two months last year. Why would Dr Mahathir
sack someone who is aware of all his secrets, knowing
that the sacked person would use them later? This is
certainly not the behaviour of a dictator or a man hungry
for power.
(Prof) ATTAR CHAND
Delhi
_______________
|