E D I T O R I A L P A G E |
Tuesday, November 24, 1998 |
|
weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
|
Murder
of sanity NATIONAL
SECURITY COUNCIL |
Will
Congress-Left lineup overcome hurdles? Poll
time when shortages disappear Old
faithful
The
late Pandit Rambhaj |
Murder of sanity TARA SINGH HAYER, one of the distinguished Indian intellectuals settled in Canada, has been assassinated by certain misguided elements. His murder is a reminder of a gory decade in Punjab during which period thousands of innocent people lost their lives and property. The state, known for its traditional communal harmony, composite culture and economic growth, got a shattering setback. Besides the ISI of Pakistan, some people or groups in the UK, the USA and Canada funded terrorism and militancy in India and there was a time when few persons from Punjab settled abroad could summon sufficient courage to criticise terrorism in this country. Quite a few of the exceptionally courageous individuals were shot dead or maimed when they tried to condemn the fountainhead of death and destruction. Hayer was a journalist for whom his country of birth had immense attraction. While remaining a respected Canadian citizen, he kept his links with his "original home" strong. India, to him, was an indivisible country and every drop of blood of his forefathers' land was too precious to be shed by terrorists. Journalism was not a profession for him; it was a mission. He criticised all Canadian and other non-resident Indians who had a soft corner for the fundamentalists. His Indo-Canadian Times travelled far and wide every week. It was the voice of sanity and moderation. It reflected the deep-rooted conviction of Hayer that the NRIs of all faiths or regional description had something at stake in the context of India's loss of tranquillity. He wrote vigorously against the Punjab killings. The reward that he got for his efforts to promote peace was a crippling bullet injury inflicted on him by Canada-based terrorists in 1988. Half of his body was paralysed. But he did not stop working for the restoration of normalcy in Punjab. When peace finally came to the state, he welcomed the "transformation of attitudes and the victory of good sense". Hayer was a
forward-looking man. Too much of stress is being laid on
the controversy on the issue of the use of tables and
chairs in gurdwara langars in Canada. Eyebrows were
raised in certain circles in India on the journalist's
support for the idea of introducing furniture in langars.
The supreme temporal authority of the Sikh faith issued
an edict against Hayer. But he took the criticism
stoically. When he was killed on November 18 in suburban
Surrey, near Vancouver, all thinking sections of the
multi-stranded Canadian society felt a rude shock. The
feeling of grief has come to India in a spontaneous
manner. Two major pointers are seen in Hayer's killing.
One, terrorism is dormant and not dead in Punjab and
amidst certain factions of Punjabis settled abroad. Two,
there is need for greater vigilance in this respect.
Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal must take note of the
sad message of Hayer's elimination by
"fundamentalists". While thinking of the
unifying spirit of the well-known journalist, we pay our
homage to Jeevan Singh Umranangal, who, like Hayer,
neither bent nor broke under the militants' threat.
Hayer's assassination amounts to the murder of sanity. |
Sustained slump THERE is some more bad news for Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, this time from the impeccable think-tank, National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER). Its half-yearly analysis, based on the audited accounts of 500 top manufacturing firms, shows that all indicators are moving in the wrong direction. The index of industrial production is stagnating at around 2 per cent, aggravated by a fall in the output of capital goods. The upshot is a likely steep reduction in excise revenue this year by as much as Rs 5000 crore compared to the target fixed in the budget. Exports too are shrinking in tune with a sluggish trade growth all over the world. Exports and manufacturing- related imports too are coming down, and coupled with lower crude prices, customs collection is down by Rs 6000 crore. A note prepared by the department of revenue in the Finance Ministry warns that despite a robust increase in income and corporation taxes, the overall shortfall in anticipated revenue can be as high Rs 11,000 crore. This has serious implications for the remaining months of the financial year. The government has to borrow more money, above the original estimate of slightly more than Rs 91,000 crore. But the trouble is that this is ballooning. The government has already borrowed in four months what it should have done over six months. Every paisa of this huge amount increases money supply, and conventional wisdom says that this stokes inflationary embers. Anyway, the government has foreclosed its option to impose additional taxes and has very little scope for expenditure cutting. The final impact will be on the fiscal deficit, hopefully pegged at 5.6 per cent. It may end up above 6 per cent. Agriculture was expected
to grow by 3.5 per cent, but unseasonal or excessive
rainfall has put paid to that. The country will be lucky
if this sector grows by 3 per cent, even this being an
ambitious figure. The rate of economic growth itself has
to be scaled down to about 4.5 per cent, from the Prime
Ministers call for 6 per cent and the
industrys recent assessment of 5 per cent. The
NCAER survey finds the feel-good factor totally absent in
business circles, faced as they are with falling profits
and growing competition. There is an entrenched demand
recession, barring for a few consumer durables. Even the
mighty Maruti is cutting back on production by as much as
25 per cent. What is bad for Maruti should be bad for the
country, to parody an old American saying about General
Motors. Like the dreaded psychology of scarcity
propelling prices upward, a new psychology of slow growth
seems to have taken hold of Indian industry. It needs
more than brave words and pious platitudes to reverse the
situation. |
PCs for all ! IF slogans and promises had the power to effect social, educational and economic transformation, India would have been leading the rest of the world in terms of all-round progress. By stating that his government would soon unfold a plan for taking personal computers to the masses Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee added his name to the list of leaders who have made promises which are difficult to fulfil. He, perhaps, got carried away by the fact that he was in Hyderabad to formally inaugurate the first phase of the ambitious hi-tech city which is expected to put India on the global information technology highway. It goes without saying that the development of Cyberabad is an important milestone for a country which has a lot of catching up to do to be at par with the countries which have recognised the potential of technology as the medium for all-round economic growth. And the credit for making India dream about becoming an infotech giant goes to Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu who commands more respect and attention at global meetings than any other Indian leader. Taking PCs to the masses is a laudable objective but to make this happen the Centre would have to allocate more funds to the Human Resource Development Ministry. Years ago, inspired by the UN declaration India set for itself the goal of health for all by 2000. Soon shelter for all and education for all were added to the list of State-sponsored promises. Now, Mr Vajpayee has promised PCs for all during his visit to Hyderabad. Given the alarming level of illiteracy placing a PC in every hand is surely not going to help the country leapfrog into the information age. The country needs more
schools and existing schools need regular classrooms and
the existing classrooms need blackboards for spreading
the base of primary education. Mr Vajpayee was more
realistic in identifying the shortcomings in the present
education system while delivering the 17th convocation
address at the Satya Sai Institute of Higher Learning at
Prashanthi Nilayam in Puttaparthi. Perhaps, he had at the
back of his mind the controversy generated at the
Education Ministers Conference in Delhi and the
attempt of the Uttar Pradesh Government to make
compulsory the singing of Vande Mataram and Saraswati
Vandana in schools when he called for a national debate
on educational reforms. The Prime Minister was on firm
ground when he emphasised the role of teachers in
building both the character and the intellect of
students. Our schools and colleges cannot be seen
as education factories that mechanically churn out
degree-holders. Mr Vajpayee was at his devastating
best when he said about teachers that they themselves
needed to be men and women of character. He spoke like a
true statesman when he said that they should
develop a keen interest in study and research, adopt
innovative methods of teaching and, above all, set a
standard for students with their own conduct.
Doesnt society have a right to expect this from our
teachers? The sooner the debate on educational
reforms is initiated the better it would be for the
country. But it should not be the kind of exercise
undertaken by the HRD Ministry which generated more heat
than light on how to make education more meaningful for
students in the global village. The Amartya Sen model
which lays emphasis on spreading the educational and
healthcare network for balanced economic growth should be
included in the agenda for the debate proposed by the
Prime Minister. |
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL THE Vajpayee-led coalition government at the Centre is preening over the fact that by setting up the National Security Council it has fulfilled another promise made in its national agenda for governance. Admittedly, the Prime Ministers idea is a step in the right direction. One cannot find fault with the NSC concept, or the urgency for one, in the backdrop of a fast deteriorating security environment in South-East Asia, particularly in Indias immediate neighbourhood. In fact, there is no dispute over New Delhis requirement for a national security doctrine. But the composition of the NSC, which the Prime Minister announced last week, raises serious doubts about its ability to deliver the goods. Why? Three basic reasons come to ones mind. One, because in the existing system of governance it is difficult for a four-tier set-up to define the fundamental national interests as they exist and as they can be projected in a time-frame of 15-20 years. Two, one wonders who will coordinate and who will monitor whom in this unwieldly group. Three, it will accelerate the ongoing bureaucratic-military confrontation on security policies and planning. It is bound to meet the same fate as the earlier security group which Rajiv Gandhi had constituted. Not many remember today that the National Security Council idea was initially conceptualised by Rajiv Gandhi after he took over as the Prime Minister, and not by V.P. Singh, as is generally believed. On the advice of his buddy and Minister of State for Defence, Arun Singh, Rajiv Gandhi went into the issue in great depth. However, in their wisdom they did not call it the NSC, as they believed, as it would have raised the hackles of the Western powers and the hostile neighbours who could look at India with a suspicious eye. A low-profile set-up called the Policy Planning Group on National Security was proposed under the chairmanship of Rajiv Gandhi. The group included Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, P.C. Alexander, Chief Ministers of Kerala and Assam Karunakaran and Hiteshwar Saikia, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission Raja Ramanna, Director of the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses, K. Subramanyam, and the Cabinet Secretary, with R.K. Khandelwal, Chairman of the then Joint Intelligence Committee, as the Member-Secretary. But the set-up was eventually given an innocuous name of Inter-Disciplinary Group (IDG). Significantly, Pokhran-II was conceptualised by the IDG, a decision in which the then Army Chief, Gen K. Sundarji, was also involved. Unfortunately, Rajiv Gandhis low profile Security Council was converted into a high profile jumbo-sized body by his successor, V.P. Singh, who, incidentally, was then Defence Minister and privy to the IDG and its working. However, it was completely overhauled, politicised and bureaucratised. Predictably, this large group proved to be an unmitigated disaster which got a quiet burial after its first meeting that turned out to be nothing more than an introductory get-together. Nonetheless, the NSC had captured the imagination of the political class, which used this as yet another whipping boy of the government of the day. Narasimha Rao resurrected it in name in the shape of periodic promises made in Parliament and outside. The BJP, which had demanded the constitution of a National Security Council while in the opposition, decided to fulfil its desire on coming to power. In fact, Prime Minister Vajpayee started off well on this promise. Eager not to have a flop council a la V.P. Singh, he set up a task force to recommend how best the government could go about planning the National Security Council. The force was headed by former Defence Minister K.C. Pant, who was assisted, among others, by the Prime Ministers close confidant Jaswant Singh. Ironically, the Prime Minister accepted and implemented only one of the several recommendations of the Pant Committee. Clearly, the six-member NSC, headed by the Prime Minister and comprising the Ministers of Home, Defence, External Affairs and Finance and the Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, is no more than an incarnation of the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs. The CCPA is essentially the Inner Cabinet, as it is called in Britain. Senior ministers who enjoy the Prime Ministers confidence are its members, and decide on all important issues, including those of war and peace. Remember, the British government fought the world wars through its CCPA. The NSC lacks an independent secretariat and back-up structure. Instead, it has centralised decision-making in the Prime Ministers Office, which has already got clogged with pending work. Its first blind spot is that the Prime Ministers Principal Secretary, who has an overfull plate, will now be required to double up as the National Security Adviser. How, one wonders, will Brajesh Mishra find the time from his terribly busy schedule of overseeing the PMO and reporting personally to the Prime Minister every evening to apply his mind to the vexed questions of Indias security perceptions? Both are crucial full-time jobs which need undivided attention. No matter how shrewd and competent a part-time adviser is, an over-burdened person cannot successfully respond to the highly demanding requirements of managing national security in a fast-moving world. More. No doubt, Satish Chandra, our man in Islamabad, is the right person to have been chosen as Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee. His credentials are impeccable. He is one of the most competent, knowledgeable and dedicated IFS officers. Earlier, he represented India ably at the UN in Geneva. However, will the NSC secretariat be nothing more than the JIC, as we know it? One of the cardinal principles in the decision-making process is not to mix up responsibilities for intelligence assessment and policy making. One requires the processing of information and the other stipulates its optimum use for arriving at a decision. Besides, instead of rectifying the ills that have crippled the JICs effective functioning, the Prime Minister has repeated the mistake of his predecessors. Basically, the JIC was set up to be the hands-on agency in the sphere of intelligence gathering. But, like other joint committees, it has over the years been emasculated because the intelligence agencies seem quite happy with doing no more than conveying directly hot items of interest to their political masters in a bid to carry favour. The Director of the IB, the seniormost police officer, once had unfettered daily access to the Prime Minister. Now he meets him hardly once a week! Over the years, the level of security has unfortunately registered a decline. Indeed, not one security agency seems capable of anticipating and taking pre-emptive action. Remember RAWs botch-up in Bangladesh in 1975 over the Mujib affairs, and in Sri Lanka in 1987-88. Also, the IBs shameful failure to act on the warning received in connection with the assassination plot against Rajiv Gandhi. Sadly, the politicisation of the countrys intelligence set-up has greatly facilitated the functioning of foreign intelligence agencies in India. Not only has the ISI of Pakistan but also the CIA, etc, are festering here like water hyacinths. As it stands, the ISI has spread its tentacles all over the country from Kashmir to Kerala and Maharashtra to Manipur. Never forget Dawood Ibrahim and his Ramesh Sharmas! Besides, it does not need a covert operation or a great spy to unfold the reasons for the sticky intelligence mess the country finds itself in. The needle of suspicion rests on none but the politician. Since time immemorial, the government of the day has seriously eroded its efficacy through bureaucratic interference. This time round too the NSC bears the stamp of bureaucratic zeal all over it. Said a senior defence personnel: It is a bureaucratic set-up. They have simply created it to kill it in red-tapism. For them anything that does not suit them does not suit the nation. Besides, the NSC is not a constitutional or legislative body and can be wound up any time. It remains to be seen how soon it will be strangled to death. Thus, the new NSC should encourage convergence and neutralise the divergences. Levers of diplomacy, trade, economic policy and, in the ultimate analysis, military power will have to be honed for the purpose. These will, of course, have to work under the strategic plan to ensure that there is no dissonance within the system itself. This plan will be able to reveal in advance what aims and goals are feasible and what kind of a national effort and resource allocation strategy is required to meet potential challenges. Finally, it is time the
powers that be stopped dithering and playing the fool
with national security. INFA |
For educational reforms THE twentieth century, more than any other period in human history, has witnessed tremendous progress in science, technology, space, outer space, medicine and telecommunications. But the sum total of human happiness, peace, tranquillity and harmony has been in inverse proportion to all the material advances. That is because equal emphasis has not been laid on moral upgrading as it has been on material progress. Swami Vivekananda said: Education is not the amount of information that is put in your brain and runs riot there undigested all your life. We must have life-building, man-making, character making and assimilation of ideas. If education is identical with information, libraries are the greatest sages of the world and encyclopaedias are rishis. Swamiji also said that a man who has extensive learning without wisdom is like a pack of animal which only knows the weight but not the value of the sandalwood it carries. Therefore, what is needed is to make education a tool for the development of social and moral values relevant to human society vis-a-vis animal and flora and fauna kingdom on our planet earth. The history of civilisations is nothing but the story of man marching from bestial life to an orderly and harmonious life, enjoying peace, progress and comfort. Religions appeared from time to time and preached morality, harmony, love, charity, kindness, compassion, sacrifice and devotion to duty as correct conduct of the individual. Religions called upon their followers to abjure violence and falsehood, dacoity and robbery, cheating and covetousness, selfishness and so on. Thus religions are supposed to shape human behaviour in such a way that people could live in peace, happiness and harmony with their fellow beings and devote themselves to the pursuit of art, science and culture on the one hand and socio-economic upliftment on the other. Moral and ethical values have been enumerated by Lord Krishna in the Bhagavad-Gita. In Chapter XII, Shlokas 13 and 14, Lord Krishna says, One who is without hatred or ill-will towards any being, friendly, compassionate, without ego and arrogance, even-minded in pain and pleasure, forgiving and always contented, is dear to me. Mahatma Gandhi summed up ethical values in two words: Satya (Truth) and Ahimsa (Non-Violence), in their widest sense. There is no dearth of precepts of human values. Yet modern education makes no efforts to inculcate them in the students and other seekers of knowledge. Nothing is done today in our educational institutions to instil morality and virtues in their students. In a plural society like ours, with many religions, castes, creeds and faiths, education should foster universal and eternal values oriented towards the unity and integrity of the nation. It should fight against religious fanaticism, violence, exploitation and injustice. Our education should concern itself with the development of a total person. That is what Swami Vivekananda called man-making education. One should be taught to rationalise events and situations without bias or prejudice, and with an equipoise bereft of dogmatism or surrender to sudden spurts of emotions. He is truly educated who can sacrifice his selfish, personal interests for the sake of the country and the people, and thus promote peace and harmony among fellow human beings. But in this country political leaders have only tried to politicalise all walks of life only for their aggrandisement and ultimately for enjoying the loaves and fishes themselves. A great deal of the responsibility for improvement in our education system rests on teachers. Our society has always placed the guru (teacher) on the same pedestal with Brahma, Vishnu and Maheshvara. The guru is supposed to teach more by his own examples than by precepts. With the changes in society, that venerable teacher has now practically disappeared. Replacement of those great teachers by teachers with dedication towards the development of the pupils, able to identify the latent talents in them and to bring them out and encourage their growth, is the need of the hour. But with the increase in corruption, even the teaching profession is not free from political corruption at all levels. We have teachers who have their political links to politicalise children and youth. But, on the other hand, we cannot even give spiritual education in our schools as it is considered unconstitutional. We can admire the
tremendous progress that India has made in industry,
science and technology. We have put satellites into
space, achieved nuclear capabilities, mastered missile
technology, etc. We are far ahead of any developing
country. But these are only partial successes. As an
English poet said, Vain is your science, vain your
art, your triumphs and glories, Vain to feed the hunger
of the heart and the famine of the brain. Education
will, therefore, be complete only when it inculcates
moral values in the pupil and ennobles his mind and
heart. In short, we should spiritualise education. |
Will Congress-Left lineup overcome hurdles?
A RATHER curious aspect of the Congress-Left dialogue has been the unusual noise and hypocrisy with which every interested party has responded to the move. Every one knows that if the two old political foes are moving closer, it has only been the logical culmination of present-day politics. Still no one the Congress negotiators at the Centre and the embarrassed followers in the Left-ruled states as well as the Left wants to immediately admit it. Even Pranab Mukherjee is forced to declare that there was no move to form a government with Left support. By no means, this is not due to the shrill protests from Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee or his party. Vajpayees over-reaction only highlights his misplaced nervousness at the prospects of a post-poll opposition line-up against his government. This kind of what is repeatedly described as destabilisation, plot or marriage of convenience have been part of our democratic system. Every political party, including the BJP, Congress, Left and the regional outfits, has frequently indulged in this pastime. It is a perfectly legitimate right under the parliamentary system. However, in terms of political morality, there exists a wide gulf between a gang-up to topple a ministry on the floor of the House and the one to cobble up a hotchpotch coalition of disparate elements. The latter amounts to real instability, and is more subversive. A coalition, regardless of the number of constituents, in itself is not imperfect or unstable than a single-party government with two-thirds majority. It is the ideological and programmatic homogeneity and an honest understanding about power-sharing that are more vital for the survival of a coalition. A coalitional culture has to be built up over a period of time on the basis of mutual accommodation. The secret of the record survival of the Left coalitions has been neither due to the domineering position of the leading partner, as some quarters argue, nor the ability of the leader. The alliance partners will have to invariably shed many inhibitions and abandon the practice of pressing personal agenda and partisan programmes without consensus. The new turn in Congress-Left relations has to be viewed in this context. The Left, especially the two Communist parties which form its mainstay, already seem reconciled to such an arrangement with their own safeguards. On their part, they have evolved the rule of the game and set the maximum limits to which they could go for compromise. The problem for the Congress has been that barring the Kerala experience, it is yet to acquire coalitional culture and expertise. A section of its leaders still live in the nostalgic days of its imperious domination despite the fact that it is now left with only Madhya Pradesh and Orissa. This Sultani mindset had prevented the Congress from negotiating with the outfits led by Jayalalitha or Ramakrishna Hegde on the eve of this years Lok Sabha poll which had turned the tables in favour of the BJP. In this era of fragmented polity, some of these leaders are yet to adjust with coalitions at the Centre. The Congress-Left lineup, which now seems inevitable, will face three kinds of hurdles resistance from both sides in the Left-ruled states, differences on economic policies, etc. and institutional incompatibilities. Since the two parties are the main contestants in West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura, there is little scope for compromise at the local level. Leaders of both sides have made it clear that even if an understanding is reached for cooperation at the Centre, the two rivals would continue to fight against each other as fiercely as before. Apparently, the winner will rule the state with the vanquished taking the role of an aggressive opposition. Any compromise at the state level, electoral or otherwise, would amount to yielding the opposition space to other parties. The problem for the Congress is more in West Bengal than Kerala. In the former, the Congress will have to take into account the shrill anti-Left protests of Mamata Banerjee which could carry away more of its ranks to her side. To an extent, this has already occurred. In Kerala, the Congress men do not have such a viable anti-Left alternative. This will enable them to better adjust to the novel concept of fighting at the state level while cooperating at the central level. While as a political concept this is going to be a difficult experiment for any party, its success cannot be totally ruled out. After all, a similar situation existed for a year and a half, when the Congress extended outside support to the UF at the Centre. During the period, the anti-Congressism of the Left and the anti-Leftism of the Congress did not diminish. Instead of merging identities and working at tandem, both sides had reasserted themselves against each other at the state level. Under BJP rule, the Left and Congress had at times found opportunities to simultaneously, but not jointly, assail several decisions of the BJP Government at the Centre even while heightening their mutual acrimony. In the assembly, friendly questions were asked and answered on the BJP actions. Earlier, the Congress had to suffer the humiliation of supporting a coalition from the outside without sharing power. Now the party is in a commanding position to force the other non-BJP opposition to support it. A senior Congress strategist who is associated with the talks with like-minded parties, say that despite initial resistance, the partymen would soon realise the advantages of getting support from parties like the Left. If the Congress could make appropriate ideological and programmatic adjustments as P. Chidambaram did the Left could be a dependable ally. They had stood by V.P. Singh even after his own men deserted him. This has been the case with Deve Gowda as well. The Congress-Left dialogue is part of a move for a broader non-BJP coalition at the Centre. This also marks increasing realisation in the Congress that its hopes for one-party rule would remain a far cry in the forseeable future. There is no uncertainty about the following aspects of the likely scenario. First, the Left will not join the government led by the Congress. It will provide issue-based support which will depend on the kind of interaction by the Congress side. The maximum the Left will go is up to a floor coordination beginning with an informal kind. There will not be any joint action outside Parliament. Second, even while extending qualified support to the government, the Left parties would not enter into any electoral alliance, overt or covert. This has been their approach to the BJP during the National Front days. According to them, after the Congress itself has shrunk, anti-Congressism has lost much of its relevance. Third, they have already begun efforts for reactivating the UF. They visualise a better arrangement with the new Congress leadership, which, they think, is more mature and dependable than the uncertain days of brinkmanship under Sitaram Kesri. Fourth, both the Congress and the Left anticipate a sharp divergence of views on economic policies and approach to the poor. Though both have their own commitments in this regard, they also cite a few silver linings. In this regard, it is hoped that the UFs common minimum programme could still form the basis for a consensus. Though the Congress has not been a signatory to it, the party had, by and large, expressed agreement with its contents. It could now be suitably updated. Another favourable aspect has been the change in the entire economic thinking following the collapse of the Asian Tigers which was being projected as the sole model for India. This is expected to create a more conducive atmosphere for adjustments and compromises on controversial issues. Even the IMF and the World Bank have begun taking divergent views. In any case, there is a relaxed mood in the matter of following outside prescriptions. After bitter experiences with the Tigers, yesteryears ardent advocates of reform have begun distinguishing between FDI and foreign money flow in the form of share purchases. Now they concede that India was able to escape the Asian epidemic due to its refusal to effect the full convertibility of rupee. Similarly, the sudden relevance attributed to Amartya Sens emphasis on human side of reform will also have a sobering effect. However, several controversial issues on which the Left and the Congress will find themselves on opposite poles, are bound to emerge. Even in the case of the common minimum programme there has been a perpetual clash between Chidambaram on the one side and the Left and their friends on the other in the matter of interpretation and implementation of several points. On rare occasions, the Left had also threatened to vote against certain government measures which, they argued, went against the CMP. Similar situations will emerge again and again as many controversial economic decisions are still pending. The consequences of such controversies could be minimised if the Congress itself takes the initiative to evolve a healthy dispute resolution mechanism if and when the alternative emerges. It is often forgotten that with all the differences and lack of leadership, the UF had far less open threats and challenges from the partners than the present setup. This has been largely due to the important role played by the UFs two liaison panels, including the powerful steering committee. Initially, Gowda was too obsessed with his Prime Ministerial prerogatives. But later he came to his senses by allowing an arbiters role for the high-powered UF panels. The Congress, too, will
have to evolve an effective machinery, formal or
informal, for consensus on all issues. It will have to
shed its imperious attitude and coterie style of
functioning, to suit the coalition practices. The real
meaning of the ongoing dialogue is the readiness on the
part of the Congress to head a complex coalition. |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | | Chandigarh | Business | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |