Why placate the USA?
IT seems today we the people of
India, by and large, have abandoned our sense of
self-respect. This may sound something harsh and
unpalatable, but, then, truth is often bitter. How else
do we explain or justify our very meek and unmanly
response to the intolerable insults that the USA is so
audaciously hurling on us, one after the other. We are
almost craving and cringing before the stubborn and
dictatorial postures being adopted by Mr Clinton and his
coterie.
What India has done in
carrying out the Pokhran II tests was wholly in
consonance with its security needs. And, strangely,
instead of feeling strong and proud, the government and
most of its leaders are appearing unnerved by the
American pressures. It is a pity that petty internal
squabbles and small-minded political considerations have
in a way cost the country dear. The central
governments weak-kneed policy and its readiness to
send its emissaries here and there at the dictates of
America are, to say the least, something
incomprehensible. What crime India has committed that we
are feeling the need to placate the USA and its stooges.
After the successive
nuclear tests the nation should have exhibited the nerves
of steel and the veins of iron. Instead, we are behaving
as if we stand on the feet of clay. Let us take a leaf
out of the example of China and Iran. These countries did
not succumb to American dictates. America had to
compromise with these countries. Are we worse off than
even Iran?
Are we the same Indians
who in 1921 under very adverse circumstances made a great
success of the Non-Cooperation Movement under
Gandhijis leadership? With huge bonfires of British
mercantile and other goods, the very foundations of the
then mightiest empire was shaken. And today we are so
shamefacedly patronising American goods on vast scales.
Perhaps we are drowning ourselves in the sea of American
commercial operations. We have become crazy and are mad
and galloping at everything that is American.
The 1921 Non-Cooperation
Movement did the country proud. If the shaky and feeble
legs of the government cannot bear the onslaughts of the
hot-headed US President and his cronies, let the common
people of India gather courage and make history repeat
itself. Let us boycott everything this is American, and
surely, sooner than later, sense will dawn on them and
they will start behaving. We dared the British in the
20th century. Let us dare the Americans in the 21st
century, which is so close by.
D. P. VERMA
Panchkula
* *
* *
Mr
versus judge
Mr Anupam Gupta through
his article published on Monday November 16 posed a very
pertinent question (Mr versus
judge: who is to judge?) and answered it too.
He said that No
judge, no jurist could draw a better distinction than
that. I fully agree with him and would also like to
submit my point of view that a Governor has immunity from
all law suits. Because of his position as Governor, he is
the Chancellor of a university, but in this later
position he is not immune to any law suit.
Stretching the point
further, I submit that a minister is a law-maker sitting
in the legislative assembly whereas he is a
policy-executor/servant in the secretariat.
These two positions of one
person are like two sides of the same coin. Therefore,
the judges position too is the same. A judge is a
judge when he is engaged in the discharge of his
duties in his court room or in his chamber, and he
becomes Mr while speaking conducting his
affairs at a public meeting at a public place.
OM PARKASH WADHWA
Gohana
* *
* *
Plight
of Iraqi children
Apropos of the news
analysis Secrets of Saddam Husseins
sorrows (Nov 18) by Mr T.K. Ramasamy, it is an
unhealthy trend that the (united) nations of the world
are turning a blind eye to the pitiable plight of the
ordinary people of Iraq.
Countless children are
dying of hunger because of the unavailability of basic
food items. The sick and the diseased fail to get the
desirable treatment as there is an acute shortage of
essential medicines, primarily because of the arrogant
attitude of the USA, wanting to continue with the
morale-breaking sanctions.
Undeniably, the USA has
shamelessly managed to hijack the United Nations. And the
rest of the world seems afraid to stand up and speak
against the bully. At the slightest pretext, the USA
bares its fangs to intimidate not just Iraq but anyone
who dares to differ with it in its pursuit for oil, more
oil, nothing but all the oil in the world. God help those
who come in its way.
If even now no nation
dares to stand up and speak for the human rights being
denied to the Iraqis, then the day is not very far when
some other nation might have to bear the brunt of the big
bullys dictatorial attitude.
How can the rest of the
world be mute spectators and allow this situation to
continue? Perhaps, Pastor Niemoeller warns succinctly:
First they came for the
Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the
communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a
communist.
Then they came for the
trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade
unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
VIVEK KHANNA
Panchkula
* *
* *
A
clogged system
Mr Joginder Singh deserves
appreciation for his article, Indias
ineffective rulers (The Tribune, Nov 17), in which
he highlighted the clogging in the Indian system at
various levels.
Looking for a godfather or
connections has become a must in todays scenario.
The common man, who has neither of these, is running from
pillar to post without gaining anything.
Persons occupying high
offices have little regard for the havenots. Government
employees are enjoying a perpetual holiday. Corruption
has become the order of the day. The system is plagued
with all sorts of ills. Character and discipline are
nowhere to be seen. Political bosses, under their own
compulsions, have turned their faces to the other side.
Will there be any change?
Hoping... against hope.
BIMAL GUPTA
Una
* *
* *
|